 Some Republican and conservative political and media influencers based their proposals for section 230 reform on the idea that conservative content is censored by social media platforms. Researchers have taken this accusation really seriously. But the research consistently shows that conservative content far from being suppressed consistently earns more interaction than left leaning or even politically neutral pages or accounts. In fact, a small number of conservative users routinely get more conversation and engagement than their liberal counterpoints or even traditional news outlets. Facebook's own data shows that the top performing link posts week after week are generally from conservative voices. And in fact, some tweaks that Facebook made to its newsfeed algorithm in 2018 had more of an effect on cutting exposure for progressive news outlets, then it did for conservative ones. So there may be good reasons to reform or update section 230, but conservative bias isn't one of them.