 Gwneud yn ymwneud yw ymgyrch, 476.1 i ymgweithwyr Jamie Greene, gan ydych chi'n gyllideb yn 4176 i ymgweithwyr George Adam, o'r cyfrifio'r profiad ei ddysgu, rwy'n mynd i'n gweithio, rydym ni'n gweld yn ddysgu. Gwybod yn ddysgu, yr ysgol ymgwneud ymgwneud ymgwneud ymgyrch, 476.1 i ymgwneud ymgwneud Jamie Greene, yn ddysgu, 47, yn 64, yr ymgyrch yn ymgyrch yn ddysgu, The amendment is therefore not agreed. The next question is that motion 4176 in the name of George Adam, on behalf of the parliamentary bureau on setting out a business programme, be agreed. Are we all agreed? Yes. The Parliament is not agreed, therefore, we will move to a vote and member should cast their votes now. The vote is now closed. The result of the vote on motion 4176 in the name of George Adam is yes 64, no 47, there were no abstentions, the motion is therefore agreed. The next item of business is consideration of business motion 4208 in the name of George Adam on behalf of the parliamentary bureau on suspension of standing orders. Any member who wishes to speak against the motion should press their request to speak button now and I call on George Adam to move the motion. Thank you Minister. No member has asked to speak against the motion, therefore the question is that motion 4208 be agreed. Are we all agreed? Yes. The Parliament is not agreed, we will move to a vote and member should cast their votes now. The vote is now closed. The result of the vote on motion 4208 in the name of George Adam is yes 63, no 47, there were no abstentions, the motion is therefore agreed. The next item of business is consideration of four parliamentary bureau motions and I ask George Adam on behalf of the parliamentary bureau to move motions 4178 on approval of an SI, 4179 and 4180 on designation of lead committee and 4181 on committee meeting times. The question on those motions will be put at decision time and there are four questions to be put as a result of today's business and can I remind members that if the amendment in the name of Liz Smith is agreed to then the amendment in the name of Daniel Johnson will fall and the first question is that amendment 4159.1 in the name of Liz Smith which seeks to amend motion 4159 in the name of Richard Lockhead on UK shared prosperity fund implications for Scotland be agreed. Are we all agreed? The Parliament is not agreed, therefore we will move to a vote and members should cast their votes now. The vote is now closed. Point of order, Martin Whitfield. Very grateful, my device wouldn't attach to the voting app and I would have voted no. The result of the vote on amendment 4159.1 in the name of Liz Smith is yes, 28, no, 82, there were no abstentions, the amendment is therefore not agreed and therefore the next question is that amendment 4159.2 in the name of Daniel Johnson which seeks to amend motion 4159 in the name of Richard Lockhead on UK shared prosperity fund implications for Scotland be agreed. Are we all agreed? The Parliament is not agreed, therefore we will move to a vote and members should cast their votes now. The vote is now closed. I call Rachel Hamilton for a point of order. My apologies Ms Hamilton, we appear unable to connect with you at the moment. The result of the vote on amendment 4159.2 in the name of Daniel Johnson is yes, 19, no, 91, there were no abstentions, the amendment is therefore not agreed. The next question is that motion 4159 in the name of Richard Lockhead on UK shared prosperity fund implications for Scotland be agreed. Are we all agreed? The Parliament is not agreed, therefore we will move to a vote and members should cast their votes now. The result of the vote on motion 4159 in the name of Richard Lockhead is yes, 81, no, 28, there were no abstentions, the motion is therefore agreed. I propose to ask a single question on four parliamentary bureau motions, does any member object? The final question is that motions 4178 on approval of an SI, 4179 and 4180 on designation of a lead committee and 4181 on committee meeting times be agreed. Are we all agreed? The motions are therefore agreed, that concludes decision time. Point of order, Brian Whittle. Thank you, Presiding Officer. Today's portfolio questions, we had a significant number of Government responses that had little to do with the questions that are asked, along with Government-backed Benchars supplementary questions, which again had little or nothing in common with the original question. It seems to me that every response now pivots to include Westminster or independence, no matter what the topic. I appreciate political spin. I appreciate political spin. I appreciate political spin that will always be part of this place. Fundamentally, we are here to represent our communities, and surely that has to remain a significant element of what we do here. We bring questions from our constituents to the Government in the hope of getting answers for them. Quite frankly, those sessions are becoming absolutely farcical and the Government is treating the Parliament with contempt. Can I seek your advice on how we can bring the chamber questions back to what they are designed for? I thank Mr Whittle for his point of order. I have not had an opportunity to view the session to which the member refers. As the member will be aware, the content of ministerial answers is not ordinarily a matter for me. However, I do expect, as a matter of courtesy and respect for answers to address the question, and it is also very important that supplementary questions are linked to the substantive question. That concludes decision time. We will now move on to members' business. I would be grateful if members could leave the chamber quietly.