Trey Gowdy with Comey September 29, 2016
0:00
there was communication from Cheryl Mills there was a preservation order
0:06
correct yes and he did indeed use bleach bit on these records sure what I'm not
0:12
the sort of guy wouldn't talk to us without immunity and so when you got immunity what did you learn
0:17
we learned that no one had directed him to do that but he had done it if you
0:20
certain you really think that he just did this by himself when you have
0:25
fathered unity agreements and no prosecution what you are allowing
0:29
witnesses who happened to be lawyers who happen to be targets can sit in on an
0:34
interview that is not the FBI that I used to work with
0:38
I hope someday when this the political crazy is over you will look back again
0:42
on this because this is the FBI you go in love this was done by pros in the right way
0:48
FBI director James Comey watch it here in yesterday telling lawmakers he
0:52
welcomes a discussion but not the interference suggesting the FBI acting on behalf of politics
0:58
what a day South Carolina congressman trey galleries in the hearing yesterday
1:01
sir how you doing and welcome back here to america's newsroom this sort of thing
1:06
. we were talking during the break you say you understand the decision he made
1:10
although you disagree with it what part of this decision you agree with no I
1:15
don't agree with a porno and I understand it's just that's the curse of
1:18
being a lawyer is that you're able to understand the other side's argument I
1:23
just figuratively disagree with its argument is he thinks there's a specific
1:28
intent element and a gross negligence statute so it's not that i'm confused
1:34
about it I just fundamentally disagree with it ok now he said that there were
1:38
classified emails on Cheryl Mills computer they aim to Secretary Clinton
1:43
but then he would not say whether or not that was the crime unless he looked at
1:50
the case more in-depth how do you look at the case when you give someone immunity just see it doesn't square
1:58
yeah they the immunity agreements are very troubles of their five of them are
2:04
initially they said they gave immunity for the production of the laptop but
2:09
will laptop so go to prison people do I so Cheryl Mills did have classified
2:14
information on her computer but this is what your viewers at after company
2:19
please go ahead unless understand it no one who set classified information was
2:25
prosecuted no one who received classified information was prosecuted no
2:30
one who destroyed federal Records was prosecuted out of all of this father
2:35
unity agreements and a really unusual investigation about national security
2:40
matters with hundreds of classified emails not one single person is going to
2:46
face a legal consequence that means this case is dead in the water right it is it is dead in the water
2:55
other than what I have said in the past there are multiple groups in our culture
3:00
who provide oversight there's the executive branch there is Congress's you
3:04
in the video but I'll November the eighth the real jury gets the weigh-in
3:08
and if they think that this department of justice has been politicized they are
3:13
welcome to replace it with another Department of Justice well the east he
3:18
has set for months now that no prosecuted we go forward with this case
3:22
yesterday today is a great wedding and I would understood it but his position is
3:31
that you can't get some sort of guilty verdict based on the evidence that he
3:37
has now how is it that he can see it that way and folks like yourself and for
3:43
others as you just mentioned about what accounts for this quick decision when
3:49
you've got a private server as Secretary of State in the basement of your home I think
3:54
makes sense of that well if you remember what I asked him yesterday is tell me
4:00
what you would have needed to be able to make a prosecution tell me what was
4:04
lacking huh and is instead a consciousness of wrongdoing a
4:09
consciousness that the Act mean committed was on the wall and then my
4:14
response to that was you never have anybody admit hey i know this is wrong
4:18
but I'm going to do it anyway you have to prove about circumstantial evidence
4:21
suck at the destruction of evidence these serial I'm about what you have
4:26
done that is some of the best evidence a prosecutor will ever forget about the
4:31
consciousness of guilt of a subject is did you lie about it
4:36
did you lie about it even when you don't have to lie about it did you destroy
4:40
documents all of which exists in this case so let's assume he's like that
4:45
there's an intent element and a gross negligence statue you still could prove
4:50
it from circumstantial evidence he says it could there are five prosecutors on
4:55
the Judiciary Committee all who were former federal prosecutors too by the
4:59
way and we've reached a different conclusion and it's not political you
5:03
know he sai
