 Next question is from Captain Matta. Is it better to squat lighter weight as to grass versus heavier weight at 90 degrees? Oh boy, it depends who we're talking to. Generally speaking, by the way, this is considering you have good mechanics, good form, and good stability, okay? Somebody who doesn't have good or sufficient stability or mobility, squatting as to grass is not a good idea. You wanna work your way to that with your stability and your mobility. But all things being equal, if we're talking to the average person who wants to develop overall strength, functionality, and well-developed legs, full range of motion is typically better. Now, for some athletes, it's actually better sometimes to do shorter range of motion, even higher than 90 degrees. In fact, you'll see basketball players oftentimes will do, they won't even go down to 90. They'll stop halfway down to 90 and work on that range of motion because it contributes more to their- That's the only time I see value in that. As if it's very sport specific. Everybody else should be working towards the deeper squat. Even if you can't do it, and I agree, I wouldn't recommend going right away and then forcing yourself to do it. You should work on your hip and ankle mobility, which is normally the limiting factors that won't allow somebody to get that deep in a squat. So I think that for the average population that just wants to build muscle, lose body fat, be healthy, those people I think should all be working towards the, you know, as to grass type of squat. And if they can't, working on the mobility- Be strong and functional. And I mean, what promotes better positions, like everyday positions where you're gonna be down and you're gonna be sitting in a squat more, it's gonna be lower than 90 degrees. And so, you know, to be able to navigate in that position and have strength in that. Also, it's gonna help to promote more stability around, you know, the hips and the joint. And so that way, you know, you're gonna alleviate a lot of pain that's gonna come up in the future. And so, you know, there's a lot of things to consider with that. But yeah, the only other instance I would say, like 90 degrees is if it's a performance-driven pursuit. It was life-changing for me to work towards this. I mean, those that have been listening for a long time know this about my journey. But when I was competing on stage and, you know, looked the best I've ever looked, I had terrible squat mobility. I mean, I couldn't break 90. And then after competing, spent a really long time, probably a couple of years, I really focused on it. And the benefits of that for me have been crazy. Like my hip and back pain is like gone. Yeah, you used to get back pain every time you squat it. All the time. Yeah, and then that's what kept me from doing it so much was it was just part of the process. It was like, oh, if I'm squatting, I'm gonna be ready for my back to be on fire. So, you know, work, and instead of caring about the weight. And I could squat decent weight back then. But now I see one, I see more development with less weight. So I can be squatting less weight and see my legs as developed. And then eliminating all the pain. And that in itself, I think for most people, that should be a good goal or direction. Yeah, the other people that I would say wouldn't need to train with such a low squat would be a power lifter. Power lifters are very specific. Again, it's performance based, right? If you're, for a power lifter, you wanna squat as low as required in order to get clearance and then get strong there because getting stronger, going any lower might not really give you any particular value in your competition. But across the board, your goal should be to get to that point. And if you have the stability and mobility to do it, then train that way. Then that's true for every body part. Every single body part, every single exercise, the fuller range of motion performed safely with good stability is gonna be superior, generally speaking, than a shorter range of motion.