 Charles, you had probably the harshest words for Trump. You called him ignorant, stubborn, and unpredictable. I don't think I have to ask what you meant by that. I can probably figure it out. But let me just play it against the current talks going on between China and the United States. Mr. Trump over the weekend said, a big deal has just, it's huge, a huge deal has just been reached with China. But you've got some more insight into exactly how big that deal was, right? Yeah. Or is. Yeah, I want to start talking about the so-called minute deal just reached several days ago. As you pointed out, Mr. Trump's claim is a substantial or big deal. But please remember, just one or two weeks ago, he strongly claimed he want a comprehensive deal, no partial deal. Everybody know that. But why suddenly change? I guess from his perspective, I guess it's not difficult to understand. His final goal is to be re-elected in 2020. That's his personal final goal. Support his goal, there are the two considerations. First one, he want to solidly fire his base in Middle East. That's best way is China by criticizing, strong to China. Second consideration is keep US economy from being weakening, from recession. So you look at all of his action, just swing between these two considerations. Sometime first consideration prevailed. Sometime second consideration prevailed. This time, second consideration prevailed. Why? You look at the figure. Now US economy started to weakening, particularly in manufacturing. Lots of data show that. So that case in the deal, so-called deal, China agreed to purchase annually 40 to 50 billion US agricultural products, which give Trump good reason or excuse he can claim. He obtained a victory, particularly to his base. But he did not get any major concessions from China, or at least, let's just let- Not sure, but I'd like to interject something on one of the things he said. Go ahead, did China make any major concessions as part of this deal? I don't think so. Premier Liu He, I guess, in several months ago, he claimed China has three core concerns during the trade war. First one is, if the deal is done, all of the terrible increase have to be removed. That's the first one. Second one is, increased purchase from US export have to be reasonable, rational. Third one is, the text of the agreement have to be well-balanced without hurting sovereignty of China, or dignity of China. The last one is more controversial. It's more complicated. So in this deal, of course, China didn't give up. He's called the last one core concern, because that's the part of partial deal, not all of the deal. So I guess both sides do maybe a little step forward to have kind of compromising. Of course, I read some social media in China, some corner of China feel they're unhappy with the deal. They ask, what benefit for China? China, even without deal, they agree to purchase more agricultural product from US. Only US agree to postpone increase from, a title from 25% to 30% also during the meeting in White House, rather wider to champion by saying, December 15, whether increase or not increase haven't not decide. Obviously, US still try to use the tariff as a weapon to continue push China. Chuck, what were you gonna say? No, I wanted to say three things. When you say that manufacturing is weakening, this is true in certain states. Now remember, manufacturing is a very low component of the GDP in the United States, which is an economy largely based on services. So it's relevant as much as it is in a state that's considered to be a swing state. If it's in Michigan, if it's in North Carolina, or if it's in Wisconsin, Trump will care about. At the same time, you can't say that the economy is weakening because it has been acknowledged, published very recently. The employment figure have never been so good in 50 years. And this is not what the administration says, this is the official statistic. We had the lowest unemployment that we've had in 50 years. And that's what matters at the end of the day. And in the relationship with China, I agree with you that Trump once said, I want a big deal and it will settle for anything that will help his reelection. So I think we all agree on that. I think we got it loud and clear. He's not hiding it in any way she perform. But the real issue are, as we well know, in the relationship with China, which are real, and Trump is raised these issues, but he's not prepared to deal with them because he knows that he can't deal with them, relatively short period of time. And that's not gonna help his reelection. This is intellectual property. This is the market access to mention too. This is unbalanced transfer of technology. And so, I mean, we can name it. So we know what these issues are. That's not gonna change. But what matters is that if he gets a small deal and he can say, as I said before, with the mill producer in Wisconsin, look, I get you 5% more, that may shift some electoral votes. And that's all he cares about. I mean, he's not trying to resolve the fundamental problem of the economy and the society in the US. He wants to get reelected. Just let me ask a question if I may. If we were two broadcasters commenting on a football game, who won this game? I can either. Nobody win, nobody lose for many, for many years. I think it sounds like China won to me. Yeah, I guess different people have different views. Why China agreed to do that? I guess two points. One is the way doing that is a gradualism, which is called Chinese philosophy. China understand it's harder to make a comprehensive deal in short term, but gradually to reach somewhere which will create environment to be promote the further negotiation. One thing I want to point, in the trade war, China is under defensive. That's very important. Also, you look at all of the facts. You mean other defensive in the sense that they were started by the United States? Yes. Also one thing I shouldn't remind. I feel very sorry. Not many foreign mention that. Yes, many criticism to Mr. Xi Jinping. Yes, yesterday lunch Kevin said that. But Xi Jinping say one word. Not very mentioned by many people, particularly in Western. He say, we have 1,000 reason to be have good relation with US. No single reason have the worst relation with US. That's very important. So general feeling is China want to make some compromise. That's the first point. The second point, China want to buy more time. Why? That high tech company to find some components made the non-US for export. Let them find more other market. As we heard in the high tech panel yesterday. Yeah, also want to keep a foreign FDI stay as long as possible in China. They don't want to decopying. Also from the survey of American Chamber in Shanghai, so far also I talked with my friend with that. Not many American company have already started move out. They keep hold because the cost of moving out is tremendous. But if the trade war stay longer, maybe some of them have to move out.