 was discussing the necessity for partition in India and the fate of Lindsey's post-independence. This question is related to your agenda. Would Pakistan ever have formed, had these delegates been the decision makers back in 1947? I think the formation of Pakistan as a nation was pretty inevitable. I mean, they did do a good job trying to prevent it, but that's not really something that would have changed. That being said, I definitely think if these delegates actually were there on that date, India would not have the boundaries that it does today. This is directed to the chair of the Paris Peace Conference, who are discussing on the agenda of the fate of Germany and territorial disputes after World War I. What the world has seen a second world war, had the terms of Germany's future been negotiated based on the past two days of discussion? Obviously, I cannot say for sure that World War II would not have taken place. However, I do believe that the possibility would be lower as when we were forming the treaty, we ensured that all the nations that they were equally represented, they all had equal compensation after the loss of the war. Second parliament. Your committee's agenda was the issue of Venezuela. I believe that the president of Venezuela, Maduro, was killed. What was the committee able to investigate and conclude on who, slash, which nation was responsible? Okay, so what I saw in the committee as the delegates responded to when we gave this crisis to them, they all were shocked. They couldn't believe that the fact that the president of Venezuela, who was just about to have had his trade hotel, he somehow got murdered and he and the president disappeared out of the way. They responded very well to the situation. They got to know the fact that Bolivia or the nation was responsible for this. However, Bolivia, at that time, he refused to believe it. And though he, a couple of times, he told him that, yes, this is the truth, as he was provided by one of our users, who were just urgent data. But yeah, I would be proud of that, because we responded and we investigated the situation. A share of the world is confidence. Your committee's agenda was Islamophobia and backlash in the name of religion. This question is related to that. How did the delegates respond to the banning of all Muslims in the USA? How did that work out? So we did introduce the crisis where USA banned all Muslims and I felt like everybody in committee, all the delegates acted appropriately and everybody took the crisis very well. They all were following their foreign policy and they were exactly how it was to be handled. In fact, they all had so much to say, everybody was participating so much that the special seekers, this that we established, went out of the way for a really long time and I thought they did a great job. So, here's Vinika from Algeria and my question is the chair of the United Nations framework connection of climate change. Your agenda was incremental measures to combat global warming. My question is, do we now have a possible solution for climate change? Yeah, first of all, it was my achievement that everyone in the committee recognized that there is something that's climate change and global warming. Secondly, if these delegates ever in the future go on to become global leaders, they will think about changes that will not only bring us a new change to global warming, but also reduce the temperature very far better. To the chair of the Supreme Soviet Soviet Union, your agenda was the alternatives to the distribution of the USSR. Did you see a change in the performance of first hand delegates? The first day we saw that everybody was dominated by the exceeding delegates that was informed when I learned that there was block formation and I was like, wow, I was anticipating the same however, my vice chair and I also contributed to lead the debate in a fruitful direction and by the end of the day, we could see the change. Now, when we learned that the second day there was something very unexpected that happened. However, when they gave all these leaders delegates a lot for their money. And I'm telling you that all these experienced delegates in the committee forgot about the rules and it became so difficult for the vice chair and me to decide who the best delegate is because there was no complete end game. There was no one who was driving the agenda and was controlling the council and was leading by example. But then we had to select one of those. However, I would happily walk home with the feeling that my first time was killed in the council and so how it formed for me. This is Anisha from Al-Jazeera. My question is to the chair of Lok Sabha with the agenda of the I would be at this view. At this day, it's been the decision makers back in 1992. What do you think would have been the fate of Ayodhya today? First of all, I'm so grateful to be the chair of this committee. I think more than what the delegates learned I learned in the past few days. Yeah, with that being said, yes, I do think that the leaders who have gone in such a different part if these delegates were there, they discussed this topic so effectively, so efficiently with that intensity that could not be matched even in the actual Lok Sabha. I have no doubt that if these delegates would have been there then so many, the deaths would have been so, so much more risk, there's so much less to talk about. I think they would have been the better option for the actual Lok Sabha. Thank you. This is reporter Namya from BBC World News. Getting back to the chair of the Constitutional Assembly of India, India. The matter of the pregnancy states is actually one of the most interesting parts of our committee as a whole because unlike the individual representatives from inside India, each of these is officially a ruler in their own power, which is making decisions for their own state and have their own policies. Now, I think most of us know what's happening the actual history books and we all honestly also know what's happening right now with Article 370 in Kashmir. That being said, I do believe that the pregnancy states were, they were at least maybe a bit more in some places, a bit less in some. It's possible they could have asked for more, it's possible they could have been given more, but overall I do believe that it was, there was a lot more peace between the pregnancy states and the rest of the Indian Union. So, well done, community. Question through the chair of Paraskeet Constance. Do you believe that the delegate of UK, amongst others, prioritized more peace over western interests? To a certain extent, the delegate of UK did put other nations who suffered from the war above their own, but at the same time, it also put its country first, so that it doesn't suffer a loss. Similarly, all the other nations also fought for all the countries that were affected from the war and ensured that there was equal distribution of ammunition and money from the central powers to the Allied powers and all other nations that were affected. This is Kepota Sachi from BBC World News and this question is directed to the chairperson of the Latin American Parliament. How does the delegates define the fate of President Dave Venezuela without their president? So, after the crisis happened, we have killed off the president of Venezuela and the Indian president went MIA. The delegates of the Latin American Parliament as a whole, they decided that they would step in and won't let USA take power and be the supreme nation that I call the cell. The Latin American Parliament as a whole should do it. They were ready, basically, they were all listening to each other, they were aware of each other's policies, each other's stand, and they all stood together to resolve one of their nations, correcting one of their nations, and I'm just saying from there. To the chair of World Peace Conference, will these delegates, as future leaders, be able to eliminate Islamophobia from the world? So, obviously, with our current agenda and especially considering their foreign policies and the crises that we came up with, obviously, they had to stick to their foreign policy that they couldn't deal into the fact that they all wanted to have a way of Islamophobia, but the other countries, and especially before the crisis, the conviction with which they were working and how connected the emotions that they brought about and how they feel about the entire thing, yes, I feel like at least some countries whose foreign policy aligned with that would definitely put in a lot more effort and as future leaders, I feel like it would have been, we'd be at a much better position than we are at right now. So, my question to the chair of the UNSBC, were you happy with the level of research, like the delegates actually understand the core problems and the challenges associated? The delegates of FCC work very, very well in research. They were drawing graphs, they were drawing five charts on the board to explain it to the entire community how pollution works and honestly, I haven't seen those graphs in my life. They were so well researched. They went on to find companies and brands that are making shoes out of sewage and that was quite frankly very impressive. Now to the chair of the Foreign Union, how was your experience with marking delegates and what are the needed points to make? Well, marking delegates, it was definitely one of the most toughest committees that I've chaired. It was not, it was definitely, there was some amount of confidence that was there but then I would have very much appreciated that my committee was a little more aware, just a little more aware about how the Soviet Union operated back in the day. The course of the debate took drastic turns. In fact, very, very drastic turns wherein the vice chair and the chair wanted them to step in and guess, delegate and write the agenda, clear out a few things. It was not a failed committee, but so to say, but then a few points would have been better. Let's just say I walk over a happy man, a happy person, just because it was a successful committee and everyone had a good chance of participation and everyone walked on board. The question is to the chair of Lok Sabha. In our opinion, did the ruling party and opposition leave behind their differences and issue and effective directive for the Pakistani and China vice situation? Yeah, so we have a crisis in which Pakistan across the border at Kashmir and not here and considering the current political knowledge, so that's why. You know, Kashmir is such a tough issue to make decisions on. I think George Bush once said that Kashmir is the most dangerous place in the world. And these delegates, despite that, discussed that situation so well. They were well aware of the time, they were well aware of the great situation that it was, that people were being cared and that we needed to save lives. And that was amazing enough. What absolutely blew my mind was that the final decision was unanimous. I don't think I have studied some politics in the past and seen a lot of human decisions in the Lok Sabha on such a critical issue. So if you answer your question, I think these delegates will do so well as the future of India. Woo!