 This study compared two types of hydrogen-fueling stations, one based on formic acid and another on gaseous hydrogen, to determine which posed the lowest risk. It found that the formic acid-base station had lower risk levels than the gaseous hydrogen station, due to the fact that it requires lower pressures and operates at lower temperatures. Additionally, the formic acid-base station does not require a large buffer tank, which reduces the risk of a vapor cloud explosion. The study also identified several safety measures that could be taken to reduce the risk of a catastrophic event in the gaseous hydrogen station. This article was authored by Chang-Su Kim, Young-Yun Lee, and Kyaung-Su Kim.