 because we see that there is an odyssey on this issue. As far as harm reduction is concerned, my colleagues may correct me, but I am not aware of any resolution of the CND in favour of harm reduction. So we do not have, we are not specifically mandated by our member states, our stakeholders to promote the harm reduction. Mr Fettitoff, in fact, is on record as saying, well, we've no UN resolution on harm reduction, therefore I don't take a position on it. Well, that's nonsense. If the UN odyssey needed a CND resolution for everything it wants to say, well, that would be a pretty stunted conversation. Let's face it, it's a part of the Secretary, it doesn't need to be to have language from the UN to say what needs to be done based on evidence and human rights. UN odyssey are unique in the UN family for not being able to say the word harm reduction. I think it's a term which was widely used in the WHO, in UN AIDS, in the Global Fund, in many other organisations. So UN odyssey I think has a particularly sensitive issue around it and that's a matter for them and it is true that there has never been a CND resolution which deals with harm reduction as such, but we do say there is a euphemism for it which is reducing the negative health and social consequences of drug use. So that's what we refer to when we say harm reduction. So I think Mr. Fedotov for her knows well, I'm sure what we mean when we say harm reduction. UN odyssey has supported harm reduction activities and harm reduction itself for a very long time. There might not be a resolution that's gone through CND that contains the word harm reduction because we had a big discussion about that a few years ago with regard to the political declaration and harm reduction didn't make it in. But in terms of the work that UN odyssey does, it contains a lot of harm reduction. We know that the most effective measures for addressing HIV transmission amongst injecting drug users are lead-in syringe exchange and OST and the other interventions recommended by the UN odyssey, WHO and UN AIDS. So this extreme ambiguity in the leadership of UN odyssey is something that's very problematic and it's especially problematic given that they're co-sponsor for HIV and injecting drug use with UN AIDS. They have a responsibility to be promoting science-based human rights compliant interventions to hold HIV epidemic amongst injecting drug users.