 Hello, I welcome you all once again to my channel Explore Education and Dr. Varshan Singh as Assistant Professor of Department of Education This is Kanagalstool College University of Rava and this time after discussing the characteristics of a leader and the role of a leader in social learning I am going to discuss with you the styles of leadership or you can say the categories of leadership or you can say types of leadership So a lot of the knowledge of educationists, leaders, scientists, specialists, the rest of the styles can be different We know that if you look at the leadership, we know that a leader can be authoritative, democratic, or non-derritive So, we have a lot of other things, but we have only taken a few of them. The more you can remember, the more you can remember. The more you can remember, the more you can repeat what you have to do. The more you can remember, the more you have to repeat what you have to do. So, the leadership studies conducted by Kurt Leven and his associates in Iowa University identified three different sides of leadership. When Kurt Leven was working on leadership, he was working on leadership. So, he made three types of leadership studies. What are they? Autocratic, Democratic, and Legislative. If you look at the types of disciplines that we study, then it is the same. Autocratic, Democratic, and Legislative. In the Autocratic discipline, we will tell you what you have to do. You have to be very scared. Democratic is fine. No matter how much you make a mistake, you don't have to scold yourself. You have to be disciplined. You always have to scold yourself. You have to keep quiet. And in the Legislative, you will be left alone. As you wish. Even then, if you are disciplined in the Legislative, it means that you are a disciplined person. To care, teaching, and leadership style, what will be Autocratic? The Autocratic style of leadership is also always autocratic. It was also autocratic because it is autocratic. Whatever you say is correct. And the Directive style of leadership is also autocratic. We are giving directions. In which the Autocratic leader retains most of the authority from himself. The Autocratic leader gives orders to his subordinates and expects that subordinates should give complete obedience to the order issue. If you look at the teacher, what the teacher will say in the class is what you have to do. You can't do anything if and what not. In this type, this is not taken by the leader without consulting. The leader takes a lot of orders and consults someone. The teacher has to take an R exam, or you don't want to sign it. There is nothing like that. If the leader takes orders himself, then the Autocratic style of leadership is complete. You have to mold it according to the teaching learning. Then in the democratic style, it will be cheap. This style of leadership is also a participative style of leadership. Because as soon as the democracy comes, the participation has to come. The group has to come. So the participative style of leadership will be cheap. Which can be further categorized as consensus. You will try to consult. It will be democratic. In this style, these subordinates are involved in decision making. According to the class, the students who are students will be involved in decision making. A consultative leader takes the opinion of the employees. The consultative leader is not like that. Employees are not like that. They are like that. This is what happens before and after decision making. And a consensus leader makes a decision only after consulting the group members and the group members after the discussion. Then in the lesson sphere, as the name suggests, the lesson sphere means that there is no shape. The lesson sphere leadership is also free. You have left it. The decision making part is completely left with the subordinates. You have to decide. In the class, you have to decide when you have to do the assignment. You have to decide who you are like. If you do this, you will never be able to decide. That is why it is a democratic lesson sphere. In this style, the leaders' involvement in making decisions is minimized and the people are allowed to make their own decisions. The group members are given complete freedom in setting their own goals and achieving them, which gives them complete autonomy. Then in the class, we have to do something else. One, two, three, four. They have styled leadership. They have written four styles of leadership. They have styled four styles of leadership. Exploitative, authoritative, benevolent, authoritative, consultative and participative. This lesson sphere was not mentioned. In a democratic case, it was divided into two, consultative and participative. And authoritative was divided into two. And benevolent. Exploitative means we will never give you any scope. We will not give you any scope. In this style, rather than engaging people in decision making, the leader gives directions to people. We have to do something like this. The leader shows low concern for people. We will have to work with the people. But this is high concern for the task. And the task will be the most important. We have to do this and that. We don't want results. Benevolent, authoritative. This style is also known as benevolent dictatorship where in the authoritative leader also places concern for the people. That means, we will have to be liberal and we will not have any respect for the people. As per this style, two leaders allow the employees to participate in decision making. Major decisions are taken by the leader only. Why? Because it is not authoritative. So, we will give decisions. Exploitative, you don't have any scope. Benevolent has a little scope. We will give you some concern. Then, what is in the consultative that the leader consults with employees. That means, we will take consultation with them. What should be done, how much should be done, when should be changed, what should be done. The leader shows genuine interest on the idea, shared by the support units. We will ask you. Do we have interest in your opinion or do you have any good points? Participate in this. It is a complete participation group members. You will see that you lose. Authoritative, sorry. Authoritative, wait a minute. Exploitative. In the exploitative authority, there will be no opinion from you. We have to tell you everything. In the benevolent, we will take some opinion from you. But we will decide. In the consultative, we are interested in your opinion. But the authority of decision making is still with the leader. Participation is equal to participation. It is a complete participation. It is a maximum utilization of participation. This was told by the leader. In the leadership behavior, the director's style is the followers of the role. We will tell you that this is the role. We have to do this. The director's role is planning, organizing and controlling. This is the role. The direction, directing, planning, organizing and controlling. In the supportive style we will work in a friendly manner. The main concern of the leaders is the needs of the followers. Rather, they are accomplishing the task. We are so supportive here that our main focus is to take care of your needs and not to work too hard. It is an emotionally supportive planet. Then, in the participative side we will involve the followers in the consolation process and also get the solutions and views of the followers before making decisions. In the achievement-oriented style the leaders set challenging goals for the followers. We have made a goal for the followers and we hope that they will complete it. Achievement-oriented. What is the name? Achievement-oriented. Our orientation is of club. What happens in this is that the well-willed achievement-oriented team members work well in the leadership of these people who really want to do something. Achievement-oriented. What is the task? Achievement-oriented. Yes, there were a lot more but how many of you will remember? So, let's assume that this is directive, participative, consultative, authoritative these are the styles of leadership which you like and which you can remember. Now, let's talk about leadership. There is no topic which I will talk about here. Well done for your exams and thank you and don't forget to like and subscribe to my channel. So, that's it.