 I mean, I think that to some extent the growth of preprints in many fields has provided a little bit of a model for how many different stakeholders who are not necessarily served by preprints in very obvious ways have identified ways to benefit from the changing landscape and kind of rally toward this cause. Like, for example, approximately three years ago, the position of many journals was less positive in the life sciences towards preprints. But I think as the conversation has sort of evolved, as there's been more demonstration from researchers, and as journals have, some journals have taken the step of recruiting papers from preprint servers or looking at the feedback that's left on preprint servers as a way to supplement the peer review process, I think that some of these advantages have become more obvious. So while obviously, you know, three years ago or five years ago, not every journal publisher in the life sciences was eager to be accepting of preprints, I think that Tide has shifted and made it more favorable for them to do so and enabled them to see ways that this can actually benefit them in some ways. So I can certainly see, I would hope that similar changes could happen for different types of infrastructure.