 What are some legislations you would subtract or add that you think with, I want to say drastically, but really change the environment to help people here? Myself, I would love to take control of CPP and EI. Okay. They are provincial jurisdictions according to our constitution. Before we continue. So for people who are listening, they may not be familiar with that. So CPP is Canadian and pension plan. Yes. So same thing like the United States are paying into social security. Yep. Percentage of your income with your employer goes towards your future pension. Yes. And at this point, the government holds that. Correct. So according to our constitution, we as a province can take that power on ourselves and write our own rules. Quebec does it themselves. There's QPP and there's CPP. We would like to start, well, OPP, but it doesn't... We're not going to arrest you with it, but we would like to set that up as a private fund between you and your employer. So for an example, if you're making $20 an hour, you contribute $2 an hour and your employer matches that. Good books. Yep. And you split that up. I would imagine heavy on the EI side to start with, a little bit light on the retirement fund because there's time for that to grow. But then instead of having to beg the government for your money back, if you lose your job or you decide that you need to change or something has to happen, you just walk into the bank with your funds and grab them. And with that, you would have your own equity. So you want to buy a house, you've got asset. It's not a government fund anymore. It's now yours. I think that would do a lot to empower people in this province. That's one legislation we would do. I think another one is revamping welfare. I agree. I think, and the way the retirement fund is set up right now is atrocious. These people have paid it hundreds of thousands of dollars their whole life. And now we can receive a thousand bucks a month. Yeah. Like what a joke. It's a joke. It sure it is. You and I were talking before the show. I'm like, even if you put that money in the market, no matter what time in the market, any market, S&P, TSX, whether it's in an index fund, a 5% per year, you were a thousand times exponentially better than what you get from the government. Sure. And the promise was made that you'd be taken care of. Yes. And then as the demographic shifted and we ran out of young people to fund this for the retirees, it became a problem. But instead of addressing that as an issue and seeing that this is not going to be sustainable, they continue to fund it. So we need to get off of this. We need to get out of this program. And for the people that have paid in up to this point, I think we owe them a decent retirement. I agree. So anybody who's 50, 55, 60 years old is heading in there. I wouldn't so much as say change what they've done, but the younger people definitely privatize that for them so that they can have their own funds and have their own equity. And for the people who've paid in all these years, let's give them a couple of thousand dollars a month and allow them to at least live a decent end of life. Right. And it might cost us a few dollars, but the way the government throws money into the garbage can, I can't see a better way to spend that money. Right? If you're going to spend money, do it do it honorably and put it in a place that has some type of value. Right? And those people have paid in and supported us and looked after us for all these years. And it's a joke that we treat them the way we do. And same with disability, ODSP, welfare. These are programs that they're slavery. Slavery. Like you were saying. Yeah, slave programs. Sure. There is no end game for these people. And welfare is generational now. I know. I say whoever designed the system, I haven't done my due diligence of looking the history of it, but just looking at from observational aspect and seeing the policies they have. I'm like, whoever designed the system, designed it purposely to be a slave system. This isn't by mistake. No. And so I think it's a 50-50. There is the insidious side of it. The people who wanted that to happen are like, yes. But back then we also printed our own money. So after we built the St. Lawrence Seaway and we built the Trans-Canada Highway, we built CN Rail, we had all the hospitals and schools built. They needed a place to spend this money into existence. So that's where these social programs came from. That's where our healthcare, that's where EI and CPP started, was a place to generate that currency and spend it into existence. And then in 74 when we changed that, it became a huge burden on us. Right. And that's why we're in this situation we are now is we no longer print that money. We no longer have control of that. And every dollar we print costs us a dollar five. So we're screwed right from the get-go with the current system. And so what would you do to change the welfare system? I like, and I take a huge knock from the party for this one because I see an empowerment system. I see a disability empowerment system. So as we were talking earlier, there's, I see three types of disability. There's economic disability, there's physical and there's mental disability. They're all just as bad as a person to deal with these things. And all connected. Sure. And yes, sometimes two or three are layered upon themselves. So instead of handing them a pittance, penalizing them for going out and working, let's empower these people. Let's retrain them, put them back to school, put them in a trade school, teach them something of value, maybe a four or five-year program that's a little bit front heavy on the money. And then in the back end, it's light because these people are now back into society and contributing instead of this dull, right? That's what I would like to see. And I push in with the party for that and I take a lot of heat for it, but I'm willing to stand on that and say, you know what, we can't just tear the system apart. Well, this is one of my beefs with libertarianism. And at the end of the day, ideally for me would be, like we talked about taxes. Sure. I believe without representation, there shouldn't be tax. I think at least for me, the worst one is income tax. You're stealing my labor. Straight up. Like straight up, slavery. I work, I put in labor and you take it away from me and if I don't pay, I go to jail. That's right. I don't know what else you call that. That's right. Okay. I'm a realist though too. Yep. And I know for a fact, I'm not going to snap my fingers, like, well, income tax gone. Can't. So you and I were talking about this earlier, it's like accountability, transparency. Yes. It's like, even with these systems, it's like, regardless of what social program you have, or if you're taking whatever, you know, 13% for HST or whatever taxes, VAT tax, sales tax, I, in fact, from a economics perspective, a moral ethics perspective, I, for me, I wouldn't feel that bad paying into taxes. If I saw first hand line items of where the money went, which contractors received the bids? Sure. And how the money was used for X, Y, and Z? Exactly. Zero line item, the budget. Yes. That would be the first thing, if libertarians ever got into Queens Park, the first thing we do is we take that $160 million or $1 billion budget and we throw it in the garbage can and say, come to me. Come to me with your program. Show me your budget. Show me why you need that kind of money. And then from that, you're going to find a lot of redundancies and we would be able to peel a lot of those layers off. Big, big conversation that I was having the other day when we're talking about accountability is how the government, when they put out a budget, they skew the numbers for themselves. So even though it says that there's a $9 billion deficit, they're really $16 or $17 billion in the whole because they split up their capital cost, the capital spending from their operating expenses. So any of their capital spending is off to the side. So you don't get to see that. That's like a 20-year loan. So if they do a $12 billion project, it's going to cost you $18 billion. You don't get to see that. Yeah. So even though we're at it, even if they've had the budget balanced, you're still going to be going into debt because they separate it and they do it on purpose because it's kind of like stealing 50 cookies out of the cookie jar. What did he say? The budget's going to balance itself. Yeah, well, it does. Yeah, he's put it on top of this and it's going to balance. And that type of economics is a joke. I know. And I don't understand how people don't see through that. And I get that, okay, Shear is what he is and you might not like his policies. You don't like the social conservative aspect of him. But why would you vote for somebody who's so scandalous? If you don't like Shear, you shouldn't like Trudeau. As far as I'm concerned, blue is the new red. They're the same. Oh, I've been telling that forever. These are the same parties. Sure. The only difference is the color of the business card. Totally. One party system as Noam Chomsky talks about. Yes, and has been forever. There is no real variance on the key issues. We still go to war. We're still back in the United States and all of their incursions around the world. We still run deficits, both sides of the party run deficits. The differences are literally like the color of the ice cream. It still tastes like vanilla, but one is brown and one is blue. There is no substantial difference in them. So there are parties out there that do offer differences. But then the people say, well, you're not going to win. And for whatever reason, our tribal response to that is, I've got to vote for a winner. I've got to pick a winner. But I think things are changing. I think Trump, even though he's American, he's that catalyst for independent. I think so. Regardless of if you like him or hate him, he is now a case study to be like an independent can win. Sure. But you know what, that study is being done by these two parties as well. And they have the funds and the money to implement a system to combat that. So we need to be very ultra aware of how that rolled out. And we need to start voting our conscience. We need to start being true to ourselves, regardless of the outcome. And I think that's the biggest problem is you need to let go a little bit. We inherently want control as humans. We want to control our destiny. And I think we need to just let that go and just vote our conscience. If you don't believe in either of those parties and you believe in the guy who's running for the rhinoceros party, or there's an independent guy in your community that you really like, wasted or not, vote for him.