 It would not be a Friday during the 2021 NFL season if there were not some weird news breaking during Friday. Mara Cooper going to miss the Kansas City versus Dallas game for this week after he tested positive for COVID-19. So that does definitely change things from a DFS perspective. We're going to break down that. We're going to do a snake draft live on air and take your questions to get you set for week number 11. This is a snake draft Q and A right here on the FanDuel YouTube, Twitch, Facebook and Twitter channels. My name is Jim Sonnis. I am a senior writer and analyst for numberfire.com joined here as always by Brandon Gadoula and JJ Zacharias and getting you set for week number 11. As always, we're going to take your questions later on today. You can get those in whether you're watching on Facebook, YouTube, Twitch or Twitter. It does not matter. We'll take questions wherever you're watching later on after the snake draft. We'll get to those later on as always. Make sure you hit subscribe, your platform of choice and come back here every weekday at 4pm. We have NFL DFS discussion on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday. Of course, Tom Vecchio has you covered within the ADFS every Wednesday. Let's bring on in Brandon and JJ. Now JJ, of course, the editor-in-chief of numberfire and FanDuel and JJ. No more Cooper this week, but still a lot of fun plays on this DFS slate. How are you doing today? I'm good. I'm glad that the scheduling gods gave us the Dallas Kansas City game on the main slate because if it wasn't on the main slate, I mean, there's still some decent enough games, but there's a lot of iffy games could go either direction. At least we feel pretty confident that Dallas Kansas City game could be very high scoring. Yeah. And it seems like every good game like that this year has been an island game of some kind. So it's been upsetting, but hey, at least we have that. We know we get a better idea where the ball is going, I guess now with Cooper being rolled out, but still a bit bummed about that. Let's talk to you. Brandon Gedula, the managing editor of numberfire.com and my co-host on the Heechech Fantasy podcast, our DFS podcast. Brandon, we talked a lot about the Dallas Passcatchers yesterday. How does Cooper being out alter your view of Michael Gallup, CD-Land and also I would say Dak Prescott as well? Yes. I mean, we're in the thick of things with NBA season. And usually with the NBA, whenever you have an injury to a key player or an absence from a key player, you can just sort of slot other players in at lower salaries and expect a pretty decent, like per minute, you know, again, sticking with the NBA analogy, production. With NFL, you and I always warn about, hey, you take a stud receiver off the field, that offense is going to be less efficient than they normally would be. There are going to be fewer scoring chances, fewer touchdowns, most likely. But in this case, we still have some relevant pass catchers, CD-Land, Michael Gallup, who, you know, you and I both love, I don't actually know how JJ feels about Michael Gallup. But the Heechech is officially a Michael Gallup fan club. We are his propaganda streams. So I don't really see that huge of a downgrade to this passing offense. Of course, it's a downgrade, but, you know, with Michael Gallup at 5400 from a salary cap standpoint, he's going to be such a chalky value play. But, you know, again, it's a downgrade, but it's not to the point where we got to like divest from this offense by any means. I would say the one change for me is that I had said, I think the DAC was like a hair, a hair above my homes yesterday. I would flip that now with go and go my homes over DAC. I still think that the top two quarterbacks on the slate, I'm sure they'll both be draftable in this, but it does alter things at least a bit. The other news from today is the 49ers backfield. And JJ, I want to talk to you about this because Eli Mitchell is now doubtful. We have Michael Hasey ruled out, which means that Jeff Wilson is $5,000 on Fanduil, an extreme value play. Is there enough there in terms of the high leverage work? Because Scott Youschek is still getting some targets for this team. We saw Debo get some runs in clothes last week. Is there enough there for you to go to Jeff Wilson at $5,000 for this week? Yeah, I think so. I think so. I mean, a lot of it has to do with the fact that San Francisco has given us zero indication that they actually like Trey Sermon. If Sermon had been active in some games and had been seeing work in that backfield while Eli Mitchell was seeing the work before Jeff Wilson came back, maybe I'd feel a little bit more confident that this would be a split backfield. But this past week, they obviously had a really, really run heavy approach, but Jeff Wilson still saw 27% of the team's running back rushes in that game. And he is a capable pass catcher and goal line guy. I mean, we've seen him in that goal line role historically, which is obviously something that you're going to need from a DFS perspective. And then the other thing on top of that is the matchups there for a positive game script. The Jags rush defense isn't nearly as bad, I think is what people probably think when you look at it on paper. It's a very average rush defense. But even last week, it's Jonathan Taylor, he had that amazing first quarter. And then there really wasn't that much from Jonathan Taylor after that. They really got him. And so I'm not like, this isn't like some like, they're not like facing the chargers or something where you got to just run, run, run on them. But at the same time, there's likely going to be a positive game script. They are favorites in this game. And Jeff Wilson is probably going to see like 80% of the backfields work. And so at 5K, you got to play him. I agree. I think that he's a solid option this week. There is room for not going all in because use check again could get some high leverage work, but you mentioned the pass catching. I think that's worth emphasizing because last year, the final five games, Wilson averaged like 4.2 targets per game. I think he had 36% of the team's red zone chances in that time too. Like he's gotten high leverage work in the past. And that's me makes me feel more confident in him. I feel better about AJ Dillon at 7,000. It's obviously a higher salary, but I think that it's worth that personally for the, for the safety in Dillon. But I think that Wilson becomes, you know, at least in consideration for cash games and a good tournament play as well for this week. Okay. So we're going to go to the snake draft now. We've been doing this for nine weeks now. We've alternated wins in the exact same pattern this entire time. JJ, me, Brandon, JJ, me, Brandon, et cetera, et cetera. Brandon won last week to tie things up at three apiece. JJ, you are guaranteed victory for this week. So let's light it up. Let's do it. Get yourself that and let's start this, get this puppy underway. I will say, I feel like I have, I should have won. Okay. I got the one on one, which is what I wanted. Don't just get in the third pick. Every week I identify the worst pick and I say that's my pick and it's my pick. You won three times. You can stop and play and get out here. So I really feel like the last two weeks, like after the one, because the last two weeks have had really bad 4pm game late afternoon games. And I was in like decent spots both weeks. And then my 4pm players just completely asked the bed. And I am, I am very excited for that to happen once again, or hopefully not happen because this is my turn to win. I did see DJ saying that I want AJ Dylan. You can tell me my facial expressions. My facial expressions are off the charts. I don't know what gave that away, but you're right. So we'll see if I can get AJ Dylan in this draft here right now. I'll draft number two. I think JJ, we're pretty in consensus that Christian McCaffrey is 101, correct? Yeah, I'm going CMC even, you know, I've seen the narrative that he can't score touchdowns with Cam Newton, but I'm still gonna, I'm still gonna pick Christian McCaffrey. The offense can't score touchdowns with PJ Walker. So, you know, I'll take that trade off for sure. Okay. So that means I'm up with the second pick. I'm going Dalvin Cook here in that game with the Packers. It is a situation where it's a good match for Cook. The workload is exactly what you want. I think that was pretty easy call. So, Brandon, you got two here. What you thinking about? Well, I don't want to give you the AJ Dylan Dalvin Cook stack, but I also think it's getting a little too cute to go away from Jonathan Taylor here. I'm gonna go with Taylor. And then my discussion is between Dylan and the wide receivers, and I think I know where I'm leading, and I think it's going to be Tyreek Hill in that game that should score about 5,000 points. So I'm gonna go with Tyreek here and not overthink it too much. So we had talked before about where the receivers enter the equation, and I had said after Dylan, but now that I'm given the choice of straight up, do I want AJ Dylan or Devonte Adams? It's really hard. Yeah. And I think I'm gonna go Devonte. I'll just look at a game stack there, but I think it's really hard for me to not go Devonte. You were laughing Brandon, why? Because it's easy to say things like that beforehand. It's like, oh, no, AJ Dylan's the play. And then it's like, am I really gonna take AJ Dylan over Tyreek Hill in a complete shootout or Devonte Adams? And what is a good game as well? Yep. And I think with the number of running backs we have, it is a one-to-one comparison. I'm not gonna have a huge drop off by going right back there. So JJ, you and AJ Dylan, I did on the same thing. Second pick, what's in your brain here? I'm thinking that Kansas City game. I really want to get exposure to it. Miko Hardman. I could go the Zeke route and get just three really nice running backs, but I'm actually gonna go CD Lamb with a Mari Cooper sideline. So you said you could have gone Zeke. I will go Zeke. I'll take Zeke here. Wait, wait, wait, wait. Is Jonathan... I had like a panic second where I thought that Jonathan Taylor hadn't been drafted and like, I'm gonna check my pulse here. We're good. Okay. I thought that I just made the stupidest pick of all time. We're good. Brandon, what you got here at your next two picks? So with Nick Chubb, good to go here. Coming off the COVID list within this matchup, I think I got to go him because I view running backs dropping off there. Everyone behind Chubb is just a receiver or a tight end. I've taken a lot of Travis Kelsey in these snake drafts. It hasn't always panned out. I'm not going to go there because I already have Tyreek Hill. Yeah. So I'm probably... I'm going to go with someone who I think has a really, really hot... Well, I have Taylor. Just make a pick, dude. You're going to run out of time. Bro, I got... I know. I can see the time. I can see the time, man. I'm freaking out over here. Well, I'm thinking Jamar James because I love that high end upside, but I have Taylor except I shouldn't be stupid and I should stack this to find digs. I disagree. I think you should be stupid. It's encouraged at all times in these drafts. I think digs is the right pick. I was just between digs and mixing, so I'm glad you made it easy on me. I want to take it whatever you didn't want. Yeah, it was between those two and Chase. So JJ goes Kelsey. I think that is pretty logical at this point. Can't push back on that. And you got Mahomes. See Mahomes, Kelsey, and CD Lam. That'll work. So my question is, do I go with a receiver and Jamar Chase? Just kidding. I didn't realize Jamar Chase is there. We'll take Jamar Chase. I was going to decide between Jamar Chase and a quarterback and then I saw Jamar Chase and I was like, okay, made it easy on me. I'll take him. Okay, so now Brandon will get Dak. If or I could go with the Alan stack. Oh, it digs. You should go. Do it. Do it. Do it. Do it. Do it. Do it. Get Dak. Do it. No, no. Go Josh. Go trash Alan. Do it. Do it. Do it. Do it. Do it. Do it. I want the stack. I want that game stack. I don't love that game that much, but it's too hard to pass up that opportunity. I could go running back here. I could also go receiver with Justin Jefferson, but I think I might just take a good workload here and what could be a good game and go with James Connor. I love it. I was hoping. I think that's the right pick. I think that's the right way to think about it too. I'll go Dak here to get that Zeke Dak stack. So Tony Pollard through your Russian touchdowns incoming this weekend. And JJ, what did you finish up with there? Justin Jefferson. I got the AJ Dylan, Justin Jefferson stack. So I went pretty heavy stack in this game, in this draft. I got the KC Dallas game with Mahomes, the Kelsey and then CD Lam and then got the AJ Dylan, Justin Jefferson stack in there too, which, you know, last week I had no correlation whatsoever. And then this one obviously it's only correlation with CMC in there. So I dig it. I dig that. I know that we like, we downplayed the projections in terms of these. It's worth noting that Lambs will go up with Amarias. That's kind of misleading with the way it is. I think that lamb where you took him was correct. It was after, because I think that to me, in tearing off the receivers, I would say with Noamari, it's kind of Tyreek Devonte and then lamb is like, at least sniffing that tier, if not in it. Do you agree with that? Where I think that he's in that top three at receiver right now. Yeah. I mean, I would definitely take Tyreek and Devonte straight up over lamb, but there's just a lot of upside. And, you know, in this kind of format, you want to associate guys in these high scoring games, these potential shootouts just because, you know, you need to gobble up as many points you possibly can. And CD lamb without Amari Cooper probably in line for like a 25% target share in this game against Kansas City in a shootout. I'll take that all along. I would take that for sure as well. And getting it with the homes and Kelsey makes a lot of sense. Let's go to Brandon here. You did get the Josh Allen, Jonathan Taylor, Stefan, digs game stack there. No objections here. And I do like the James Conner pick a lot because that was your last pick. Talk to the Connor pick. I agree with it. What was your thought process in going with him? So it was between like James Conner and then Justin Jefferson level receiver at the flex. James Conner still had a good workload. I know that he didn't put up the results he did. Let me try to keep track here in week nine, as he did in week 10, but the workload should still be there for him in week 11, potential to get Kyler, you know, back here this week. So, you know, we nitpicked that game or at least I nitpicked that game, that Cardinal Seahawks game on the heat check yesterday, but it's still, even though I have some concerns with it, it's not like it's a cross-off game. And so I actually really just got access to a bunch of good games aside from that Lions and Browns contest. But, you know, with Nick Chubb, good to go. It's really hard to pass that up in a snake draft format. So, you know, Chubb not really on my radar for a salary cap format. Conner not that high up on the list either, but interesting. It's a very different format. And that's why I had to take so long for some of my picks because it's like, I don't like the fun digs that much from a salary cap standpoint. But when I have Jonathan Taylor and I'm looking for, you know, some correlation, we still want upside. It's a three-person draft, but you still want things to kind of pan out. And that's why even though I love Dak, I went with Josh Allen so I could get that stack. So I feel pretty good about the team that I drafted. And again, only one sort of bad game with that Nick Chubb game. I want to hear your thoughts on Conner because it sounds like Alvin Camero probably won't play. We know AJ Dillon's like a featured back right now. We've got Jeff Wilson. Are all those guys above Conner in a salary cap format for you with Conner at $7,200? It's close. So this is another week where it's kind of shaping up like we had last week when it comes to running back where we have value, we have mid-range backs, but we also have some studs now at the top with Christian McCaffrey back, Dalvin Cook as EQL in a great game. His workload is not quite flawless by any means, but I think whenever you put all of that into the conversation, James Conner is just not necessarily a priority play for me from a salary cap standpoint. So I would probably rank him towards the bottom end, but that sounds like you disagree. So what are your thoughts on that one? So I think he's above Ingram because, well, if Kyler plays, I think he's above Ingram because the starting tackles for the Saints are likely out as well, and that's a tough situation. I think it's a pretty good defensive line. They both got similar roles, but one as Kyler, one as Trevor Simeon. So I think that's why I put him above Ingram because it's only $400 difference in salary. The question is, do I put him above Wilson? I think with the salary savings and with how desperately I want to stack Chiefs Cowboys, I'd probably go Wilson above Conner in Ingram. So to me, I think it would be Dillon 1 considering in salary, Dillon 1, Wilson 2, Conner 3, Ingram 4. We talked about David Montgomery a lot yesterday, and I still think that he's viable, but I think when you've got these good options, and with Alan Robinson being out, which downgrades the Bears as an offense, I kind of think that I'm okay putting him behind those guys. Now, JJ, we talked a lot about value backs. I like it in the order of Dillon, Wilson, Conner, Ingram. You don't need to rank them, but do you push back on any of those as far as like, am I too high on anyone, too low on anyone? What are your thoughts on those guys? No, I have no issue with it. James Conner, this past week, a lot of people are going to look at his end of game stat line. And yeah, he found the end zone, so he was still fine enough, but his peripherals were still really, really good in that game. And so if you get Kyler back, obviously, that's going to give him a huge, huge boost because he has that touchdown upside. He's going to regress eventually in the touchdown column, but that regression doesn't hit as hard if the team is just scoring more points and finding the end zone more. So yeah, I wouldn't push back on any of that. I think generally, whenever you're in those tiebreaker situations, it's just easier to go to game environment. And I think that New Orleans game just isn't that appealing in general. So it's just a lot easier to go to those other backs. And I still like Ingram. I want to make that clear. I think that when I've got other options, I'm okay, you know, emphasizing the health of very good offensive tackles. Okay, so that's going to wrap up the Snake Draft for this week. So let's slide on over to the questions section and check out what is being asked over there, starting things off with Elias over on YouTube. Am I getting too cute by playing Zach Erz over TJ Hawkins and Standard? Let's start with that one, JJ, for you. It looks like Tim Boyle is probably going to start for the Lions for this week, which means the Lions now deprived of the best quarterback in football. How does it impact your view of TJ Hawkinson when you downgraded to the point where you'd use Zach Erz over him this week? I think you can consider it if Kyler ends up going. I think that from a ranking standpoint, Hawkinson would still be the guy over Erz. And I say that just from the standpoint of I'm sorry, Jim, earmuff this, but don't overstate the impact that Jared Goff is making in this offense to begin with. But someone asked me in the L-Bag question this week about TJ Hawkinson and if they should drop him. And it's one of those things where let's not look at what happened this past weekend's Pittsburgh and sort of overstate what's going on with TJ Hawkinson. I mean, the three weeks prior to that, he was very much a tight end one in fantasy football. He was seeing a really healthy target. He has a 20% target share in the season. He was seeing a really healthy target share in the offense the three weeks prior. I'm not ready to give up on TJ Hawkinson because of this horrible game that he had against Pittsburgh. Yes, there have been ebb and flows with Hawkinson this year. So I think from a rankings perspective, Hawkinson would be over Erz. But yes, I can understand. I don't think it's getting too cute. That's what the question is asking. I don't think it's getting too cute to say, I want a piece of an offense that's going to score more points this week. No Deandre Hopkins. Maybe some more targets get funneled that way. If Kyler goes, I don't think it's getting that cute. Okay. And the second part of that was streamers. A Cam Newton, Justin Fields to a tongue of Iloa. Now it's worth noting here. It sounds like PJ Walker will also play for Carolina. That likely dense Cam Newton a bit. So JJ, with that context being in mind, we're going to we hear what do you think thoughts in the quarterback situation? Yeah, I've been in on two all week. I really think he's a smash play. I mean, if you look at what he's done this season, he faced Buffalo twice. One of those games he got knocked out. And then he faced New England as well. And then his two other games, we won't count Baltimore because he came in halfway through the game. And then the other two games that he played was against Atlanta and Jacksonville. And in those two plus matchups, he smashed, you know, he had 21 points and 26 fantasy points. So I think two is the top streamer this week. It's a very beatable defense. I mean, they just keep giving up 40 plus points a game. You got to got a look at the quarterback who's facing that defense. And, you know, I know a lot of people get scared off of this kind of game. Number one, you know, we talked about this earlier in the week, Jim, but number one, this spread of this game is a lot tighter than I think people would expect. But number two, in order for a team to get into a positive game script into garbage time, the quarterback has to get them in that position in the first place. So if Miami scores four touchdowns this weekend, then like if that were a given, let's say, then you want to use the quarterback because it's very easy for that quarterback to maybe get all four, even get two, you know, even if two only has two of those touchdowns, he's still going to be very viable as a starter in fantasy. So I think he's a really, really good option this week. The non competitive game concern is much higher in DFS and season long, season long cares. Like if it's like a six spread that increases and apply total, cool, let's party. So yeah, for DFS matters a lot more. Let's talk to John Herbert or Hertz. Brandon, we got Justin Herbert facing the Pittsburgh Steelers, Jill and Hertz facing the Saints for his three pass attempts this week. What are you thinking about these two? That's tough. I know, I know Herbert's had just been up and down. Hertz has been, you know, mostly consistent. But you and I, Jim have talked about this team's pass rate just plummeting off the face of the planet. This game's not very good. So I'm going to lean with Justin Herbert by a 10. I have it very close in my projections. But I'm going to side with Herbert here just because it's always easier to say play the, play the quarterback whose team actually wants to throw the ball as opposed to the quarterback whose team does not want to throw the ball ever. And it's not really the Steelers defense. It's the Steelers defense with no make of its Patrick, no TJ Watt. That is a massive, massive downgrade for them there. Let's talk to John Dalton Schultz and Mike Kosicki. Now, if you'd asked me this an hour ago, I would have said Kosicki by a mile, but now JJ with no Mara Cooper, I think at least makes this an interesting question here for you. So Dalton Schultz or Mike Kosicki this week, I might go with Dalton Schultz. Honestly, I mean, like we, we saw, we saw his target share drop to like 6% this past week. And, you know, I don't want us to like overinflate what's going on with Michael Gallo coming back and assume that that's the kind of target share he's going to see week in a week out. I think that what we're going to see with a healthy wide receiver group in Dallas is just some weeks, you know, if there is a player that goes off like CD lamb went off last week, if that player does exist, and that means that other guys just won't have very big games. But at the same time, I think that a lot of these guys can all thrive and what, what is a good offense. So Dalton Schultz, I think from a projection standpoint, going to see probably 12 to 15% of the team's targets in that game environment. I will take that all day because I think there's going to be a lot of passing volume potential in the Dallas Cowboys offense. So if Schultz sees seven targets, which I think is possible, I think you got to play him. It's worth noting too, like they didn't, they didn't go to three receivers set just because Gallop was back, like they just took lamb off the field at times, like they kept two tight ends out there, which is good for Schultz, like the target share is bad, but the usage is fine. He ran them, he ran the most routes in the Cowboys last week. That's absurd. Let's talk to Alvin here with a trade question for you, JJ. Would you trade Clyde Edwards, E layer and Alexander Madison for Tyler Lockett and half PPR? He's got some decent, but not great wide receivers. So we'll be an upgrade over, you know, cooks for the wide receiver two there. Dalvin and Zach Moss would be the two running backs there. Now Zach Moss, pretty shaky. So would you use or move Clyde Edwards, E layer for Tyler Lockett effectively in half PPR? So CEH is sort of in that like Miles Sanders bucket. I mean, I like CEH more than Sanders, but they're sort of in that in that bucket of players where if your team right now is sitting on like as like a fringe playoff team, which looking at this roster, you're probably a fringe playoff team, you know, like, you know, you might not be like in first. And if you're not in first, you know, I wouldn't be taking on a guy like Clyde Edwards, a layer or wanting a guy like Clyde Edwards, a layer. I would just go for a guy like Lockett who's a little bit safer at this point. But if you're a fringe playoff team, I think going after guys like CEH and Miles Sanders and those types of players, you know, just understanding that there could be a committee, which I think we should expect with Daryl Williams taking on pass catching work, you know, with Jordan Howard, which I can't believe I'm saying that, but with Jordan Howard taking on early downwork in Philadelphia, I think the Philadelphia thing is a lot scarier for Miles Sanders for the record than Daryl Williams for CEH. But regardless, you know, I just wouldn't feel that comfortable trotting Zach Moss out each and every week at this point. And so that's why I'd probably hold tight. And because this team is, looks to be where it's at, I'd probably still hold tight to just get maybe that upside with CEH, you know, the chief's offense is clicking a little bit more. They might have some more touchdown opportunity for them. So it probably hold tight here. And we know that Lockett's a fairly volatile week to week wide receiver anyway. And the wide receivers you have, not only that, I love Godwin. I love Brandon Cooks. Corey Davis is a really, really nice schedule from here on out. And Jarvis Landry still, I mean, they need to pass a little bit more, but he's at least seeing the right he at least he at least has the right peripherals that we don't really like to see. So I mean, he's fine as like a wide receiver for it too. So I think that you're fine if you want to hold tight with Clyde Edwards and Alexander Madison. I think that makes sense. Let's talk to Sean here, answer a couple of questions. I'll go with the first one. I'll go Kyler Murray over Jalen Hurts for your quarterback conundrum. Foreman versus Darrell Williams is tough because we don't know if CHB activated it yet. CH is active. You'd find that out by tomorrow at four when they announce VSB activated from IR. If CH is inactive, go Darrell Williams. If CH is not activated, I would go with Deontay Foreman there. And then for the receivers, Rashad Bateman, Hunter Renfrow or Brandon Ayuk, that one's tough. You guys got a strong opinion? It's Ayuk for me. I like Brandon Ayuk. The one thing that you can say for sure is that the 49ers should have a very easy path to efficient passing this week. Brandon Ayuk has over a 20% target share of the past two games with George Kittleback. They've really just focused on Ayuk, Debo and Kittle. I would lean Ayuk there, but I might be in the minority. 20% target share for Ayuk this week, which means three targets. That'd be a thriller for Brandon Ayuk this week. Are you going to say it's somebody else? I'm going to go Renfrow. I actually think in like season long terms, Renfrow is such a season long guy. I do think that Renfrow has an insanely good floor, obviously. He's going to see seven targets, eight targets, potentially this game. I think of the game environments listed there of the three, that's the best game environment. I honestly think I want to go Renfrow of the three. That's probably not the worst idea. This is like Bay Boy though. DJ, we did that one before. Shake and bake. Lost in Mari Cooper. When you start Mark Ingram, because Avonkamerra is out, so start Mark Ingram. Jeff Wilson or Stack Devante with Hurt. That's a different one. I'm not sure of the Stack Devante with Hurt's thing. Oh, you're starting Hurt's a quarterback should you use Devante as a result. There we go. Talk myself through it. I am probably going Ingram here. Am I egregious in doing that? No, that's by volume. Go after the chase the volume. Okay. Let's talk to Darnell. Would you go with Michael Pittman against Buffalo or roll the dice with Kaderius Tony? Tony coming back, facing a banged up Tampa Bay secondary. I would still go Pittman, but I'm at least tempted, right? There's temptation, but we still don't really know for sure. In an ideal world, they'd be using Kaderius Tony the way they should use Kaderius Tony, but we just don't know. There's question marks about that. If there weren't question marks about that, I think it's more of a discussion because of the matchup for Michael Pittman, but Pittman's just, he's a monster. In three games against top 12 adjusted past defenses at Number Fire, Pittman's got a 28% target share, a 10.3 per game, 86 yards in a touchdown per game. So Wenz falls off, but he still throws it to Pittman, so. As he should. Darnell, do we love Gallup of the Mari on the COVID list? Darnell, I think Gallup might have been a love for Brandon and me yesterday on the podcast. Yeah, he was going to be both of ours, but he was yours. Because I stole it. Yeah, and he was one of my values on more ways to win this week. So it looks like we're the trio of Gallup lovers right here. We love him more Darnell. We just love him all across the board. And finally, I think Darnell tuned in late. So just quickly, I'll give the thoughts on Jeff Wilson. I think Darnell, to me, he grades out behind AJ Dillon with regards to salary. I might put him second, though, in terms of once we consider salary. So I think that's where I'm at with that one. If it's a season long thing, I'm feeling pretty good playing him there. Grim fan, should I play Jamal Agnew? No, please don't. I know, I know the targets are there. I really, really, really don't want to do it. Look, look, Grim fan, I get it. I have to start him in a league this week. I understand the pain. I'm starting to die, but I'm tanking. So like, I don't know if that actually counts. I mean, my team, it's just my, it's my worst redraft team. So. Okay, let's talk to Chris here quickly. Does golf being out affect Swift positively or negatively? Go ahead, Jim. No, go ahead, Jim. Yeah, Jim, I think that you should answer this one. It's negative. So I know, I know that I have a blind spot towards Jared golf, but Tim Boyle has been caught a couple of times for various reasons, and it means fewer touchdown chances for the team means less chance to move the ball, less chances to score more touchdowns. And the way you score points in fantasy is yards and touchdowns. They may run the ball more at a higher rate, but that does not net out as being a positive. So downgrade, it's a good question to ask Chris, totally understand it. But I would still say no. We also don't know Boyle's tendencies either. I mean, Jared Gosman targeting the Lions backfield at such a high rate. And that's why Swift has been. Maybe Tim Boyle is a digaff or maybe Josh Reynolds blows up. Exactly. Maybe. Let's go with that. DJ, do you recommend getting Tyler Johnson with the Antonio Brown situation? I mean, the problem, the problem is that Tyler Johnson hasn't done much, even with Antonio Brown sidelined over the last few weeks. So I don't think it's that necessary, because then you're obviously like projecting that something's going to go on with, I mean, something might happen with Antonio Brown. Who knows, because he did something really stupid, but, um, well, yeah, I just don't think he's worth an ad. Okay. CJ, half PPR pick two to Mark Ingram, Jeff Wilson, T Higgins, Ingram, Higgins over Wilson, correct? It's pretty close, I would say. Um, I love T Higgins this week. If we get, I mean, assuming Mitchell's out, I'd have a hard time going against the two running backs and half PPR. Yeah, I'm going running backs. Cool. I feel better about that. I thought that I was being irrational on Jeff Wilson, so I feel better knowing that I was, you know, Higgins doesn't Higgins score. He scored like between the same number of points every like 11 and 14 points every week, it seems like. Yeah, I think that's, that's. And Jeff Wilson has more touchdown upside, I'd say. I would agree with that as well. Final one from Grimfan. I'm not going to put the kiss of death on the Browns. I refuse. I don't need to do that right now. I will. Yeah. The Browns are, yes. Yes. No, this show is cursed. Every time we talk about it. You're cursed, Jim. You're cursed. Accurate. Accurate. Yes. I am cursed, so JJ says the Browns are okay, Grimfan. They are okay. I will lead myself out of it. I'm just going to, yeah. See, thank you. I'm not going to answer. Thank you. You understand, Grimfan. That is why you are a loyal listener who understands me and you respect my well-being on Sunday. Thank you, Grimfan, for your service. That is all that we have here for today on this Snake Draft. As always, make sure you check out JJ's podcast, the Late Round Podcast, wherever you get your podcasts, and follow JJ on Twitter at Late Round QB. Check out Brandon on Twitter at Codula13 and check out our DFS podcast by searching for the Number Fire Daily Fantasy podcast feed wherever you get your podcasts. JJ, any final thoughts for you before we close up shop for this week? Well, I've got a season-long team where I'm starting. Ezekiel Elliott, Michael Gallup, CD Lam, and Dalton Schultz. So let's go cowboys. Let's go cowboys. Brandon, any final thoughts for you after we know all that we know this week? Uh, I like the, uh, I like the Benglis Raiders game is the sneaky stack of the week. A better bat sneaky, but if it gets Joe Mixon and Jamar Chase to help me win the Snake Draft, I am fully on board. That is all that we have here for this week. Big thank you to Calvin Theobald, our video producer for running the video side of things here today. Thank you, Cal, as always, and thank you all for tuning in. Good luck to you with your lineups for this week, and we'll talk to you once again next week. This has been the FanDuel Snake Draft Q&A.