 Rwy'n cymdeilig, rwy'n meddwl ac dweud eich bod yn idevedd i'r meddyliadau. Mae'r meddwl yn i'r meddwl. Mae'r meddwl yn i'r meddwl. Yn iaith troi y bleiddo i'r modd mewn twerläfodau. Mae ymlaen i'r meddl ar deimlo. Rwy'n meddl i'r twerläfod mai. Mae'r meddliadau yn ei hunain fan hynny, ond y gallu meddliadau o ddiolchol ar gyfer gyna'u dod. Nod, nid. Mae'n meddliadau mewn gwirionedd. That's just inconvenient. Money was created to allow for convenience. The underlying principle includes barter. You have something that you worked to produce. The end all we do is barter. Money is a way to facilitate barter effectively. It's not something that has less value than what you're exchanging. It's the value of the exchanges you both perceive it. Yes, but the only value money has is from the ability to exchange it. Tewin iawn, a yw ddech chi fod ym chweithiau, mae ar y mewn ddim yn maith ddefnyddio. Mae'n meddwl, wedi bod wrth gwrs, mae'n rwyf yn dda'n adeiladau yma. Ac mae'n olygu bydd ydych chi, mae'n rwyf yn olygu hyn. Mae gennym hŷ o'r cyflwyno. Mae ar hwn callus yn olygu! Rwy'n olygu'n grannu! Mae'n olygu e'n grannu. Yn olygu'n gyfarfod y baker, ac mae'r broson ddafio'n meddwl y gallai ydyn nhw sefydol, to agree to do something and then both be satisfied and walk away with both happier. Unless there is some kind of deception or unless there is some real irrationality or some sickness in life, I'm not sure that every time we exchange, let's say I'm buying my gram of cocaine and I'm going to get high on the cocaine. I would argue that me getting high in cocaine is aimed at all...not because of society but because it's hurting me because long felly o ychydig o'r ymdines yw y gallwn... Ond yn siŵr cymhreig o'r�idio, ddiogleddion iawn, byddwn yn y cyd-ddoedd, o'r maen nhw newidion a'r maen nhw'n tu gion ei wneud. Gweithio, ond mae ymciwch yn ysgol yma, ond mae'r wneud yn y sgol yn ymciwg, efallas ar y baith o'r bwn. Mae'r arwad yn hollu'r maen nhw ymni-mwneud yn ei gion. Mae'n hollu'r bobl yn hollu'r bobl eu ddrefnod yma, Smith describes it is our ability to then trade to keep improving our world and so so yes it's on it's inherently trade as an inherently moral activity it's an inherently moral activity because it's about bettering your self-interest and you see Adam Smith views it as it's not so moral but in the end it makes everybody better off so it's okay yeah I think he views it as a moral doesn't he well it's not good or bad it's just and the motivation is suspect anytime self-interest steps in it's the very least it's such yeah now that that's something else because what I mean like what what I was getting at is basically you can see why capitalism is so productive if you just look at the interest yes it's you know someone else's interest alignment someone else's interest they mesh together they both benefit yes they it's it's you know and and suddenly and they both got the desire to do that again yes you know or with other people it's like and the communists just can't understand why capitalism is so productive it's like well it's obvious two people are getting their interest served without any loser in the equation absolutely of course that's going to be productive and and and if I work harder or if I work smarter I'm going to make more money yeah isn't that a motivation to work harder and to work smarter so