Dr. Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson - WTC Destruction & the 9/11 Truth Movement Cover Up - Part 8 of 12





The interactive transcript could not be loaded.



Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Mar 2, 2011

This is from an interview with Dr. Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson from TNS Radio on September 14th, 2010 about the World Trade Centre destruction and the "9/11 truth movement" cover up.
mp3 (2hours 39mins - 27.4 MB) - http://www.mediafire.com/?rk5dan983j8...

Dr. Wood's website - http://www.drjudywood.com
Andrew Johnson's website - http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms

Where Did The Towers Go? book website - http://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com


See also 9/11 - The New Hiroshima:

And here's another recent interview with Dr. Wood:

Here's an example of the authorized "9/11 truth movement" dismissing and misrepresenting Dr. Wood's research:

Jason Bermas censors Discussion of Dr Judy Wood and Red and Blue Lists - Alex Jones Show - 21 May 2010
mp3 (0.45MB - 2mins 34s) - http://www.mediafire.com/?vbmm1tptgrl...
Notice that Alex Jones couldn't present the show that day, but he did manage to find the time to phone in and reinforce Jason Bermas' misrepresentation of non-authorized 9/11 research.


Here's another example of the suppression of unauthorized 9/11 truth from Richard Gage of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth fame:

AE 911 Truth-9 Sep 2010 - DEW Question.mp3 (0.23MB - 1min 18s) - http://www.mediafire.com/?0v55mjbg1yb...
(Taken from their "virtual debate" - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKBB5k... )

See also Part 7 of this series - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7LK3C...

Andrew Johnson: [Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth] was started [in 2006] at around the time that [Dr. Judy Wood] filed the Request For Correction - http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NI... ...

Dr. Judy Wood: [It was] 3 weeks later.

Andrew Johnson: ... We privately have discussed whether these two events were connected. But anyway this group ... proudly proclaim on their website that you can make a tax deductible donation to them now - so it's essentially government affiliated.

Dr. Judy Wood: But what that means is that they can't lobby Congress for a new investigation.

Andrew Johnson: Well there you go. ... Anyway, I want to read out a little bit of the letter - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms... - because there's another chap we know called Abe [Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez]. And he joined the A&E for 9/11 truth group ... and signed their petition because if you sign the petition you are said to be a member. And he wrote to them and said to them "have you heard about the Dr. Wood research into the directed energy weapons? You should look into this." And they wrote back and said:

"We decided to remove you from our list of petition signers because, whether you knew it or not, we have chosen to carefully limit the scope of our message to the collapse of the World Trade Center and the need for a new investigation that would specifically consider the use of explosives in bringing it down. Our message is displayed on our website in the petition and mission statement. The evidence supporting our message is also found on our website, which I am sure you have seen since you signed our petition.

Your suggestion about contacting Judy Wood and engaging in a discussion [which is what Abe suggested] with her about her theories [careful choice of word from them there] about directed energy weapons and other things is a suggestion for action that is outside the scope of our message. We would lose more than we would again. If nothing else we would lose the time required to make such a contact and engage in a discussion / debate whose duration would be unknown. We are also well aware of Judy Wood and her theories. The reason we don't support her or her theories is that they are outside the scope of our message."

So you know, it goes on a bit after that but you can see they've got the scope of their message, but there's no mention of evidence and there's no mention of truth. And there's no mention of the Qui Tam case - http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NI... - for example, and how this has been put into a legal framework. So they're basically happy to ignore all of that and lead all these other thousand members essentially down a blind alley.

Dr. Judy Wood: But they were notified about the case going to the Supreme Court and one of the members emailed it to Richard Gage and his, you know, core agents there. And they were angry, wrote back and said we don't want to ever hear about this again.

Andrew Johnson: Yeah that's right. We've got this from somebody who's involved in this group: "Marshall I am not interested in the topic of this email. Do not include me on any future emails."

And this was in response to .

Dr. Judy Wood: an announcement that it was going to the Supreme Court.

  • Category

  • License

    • Standard YouTube License
Comments are disabled for this video.

to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...