 This is like the ultimate it's different when Democrats do it Top Republicans are attacking Hakeem Jeffries as an election denier. Yeah, that's because that's that's what he is He's got a long track record of it. Here's why that label is misleading Oh, man, you really know you're in for some Orwellian propaganda now because it's not at all misleading Jeffries as you know if you watched my video yesterday has a long history of election denial At least in regards to the 2016 election Democrats in general if you watch this channel You know have a history going back to at least the year 2000 of election denial and violence in response So I'm gonna read this article I'm gonna tear it apart because it's just so absurd the writer of this piece Jasmine Aguilera is an interesting character time put out this little video of her Just talking about herself, I guess and it will tell you I think give you some insight into what we're dealing with here Again, this is the author of the article I'm about to read you I heard the term internalized racism for the first time during a Chicano studies class in college I hadn't realized until then that I thought of myself as inferior because of my Mexican American upbringing That I felt English was superior to Spanish and that I believed the closer I could align myself to white America the better I did all of this subconsciously and have worked to move past my inferiority complex and So she's got a lot of mental issues that she now blames on white people She originally, you know, wasn't a hate monger that hated white people But then she went to college and she got in this Chicano group and they taught her about how like all of her problems Are actually because of a white conspiracy So yeah That's who we're dealing with here in recent days some top Republicans have called rep Hakeem Jeffries an election denier Starting a line of attack against the New York Democrat after he was chosen to lead the party as house minority leader Attack, I just find that so interesting because you know, that's all we've heard for the last few years Is how Republicans are inhuman dangerous threats to democracy because some of them deny their election results from 2020 Which people like me have pointed out is very odd considering we just went through four years of election denial and before that Democrats denied the 2000 election and then they got violent at Trump's or at Bush's inauguration And then yes at after Trump was elected they claim that election was stolen and then there was violence There was a pretty massive riot at the Capitol During Trump's inauguration now they didn't make it into the center of the Capitol because security had it all blocked off Strange that they didn't do that for January the 1st So continuing on here the new elected incoming leader of the House Democrats is a past election There who basically said the 2016 election was quote illegitimate He didn't basically said that he did say it and the suggestion that we had quote fake president Okay, this is all true Hakeem Jeffries said all these things And if I'm not gonna go back through them now I did a video yesterday if you want to check that out you can go watch it after this and it has all of his trail of Election denial which we're about to hear why it's completely different when they do it the Republican National Committee Twitter account Also posted a tweet on Wednesday referring to Jeffries as an election deniers. Oh, no He's an election denier the Connell and the RNC referring to comments Jeffries made in the wake of the 2016 election of President Donald Trump in Tweets news interviews and House hearings Jeffries called to question the legitimacy of Trump's election Because of Russia's attempts to interfere in the 2016 election so here we go It's different when Democrats deny election results because Russia interfered now to what extent did they interfere? How many votes did they change? Who knows? This isn't even a question that ever gets asked It's like the obvious question if you're an actual journalist someone tells you that you say hmm really so how many votes did they change? You know they have no answer for that the only good It's that any of this is for is as a tool for Democrats and their media to use as a weapon against the Republic That's and to delegitimize Trump to undo the election results and accused Trump of colluding with Russia to win the election And then they note here surprisingly that there was a special counsel investigation and concluded that they did not have Evidence that Trump or his campaign conspired with Russia So no evidence that Trump conspired with Russia and no evidence that any you know A hundred thousand dollars that Russia spent on ads for Facebook and Pokemon go had any effect whatsoever We no evidence at all the term election denier has taken on a particular meaning However, after Trump's failed reelection campaign. Oh, so she's just telling us that they've redefined it. Yeah, sorry You can't call Democrats that anymore because we've now decided that it's taken on a new meaning We've redefined it now to mean Republicans who deny election results. That's it So just like you can't be racist the white people Democrats can't be election deniers The phrase is kind of be associated with Republicans who claim the 2020 election was stolen from Trump Assert without evidence that there was fraud in the 2020 voting and cast doubt on secure voting systems Claims that led to the deadly January 6th, 2021, which is just an absurd thing to say I mean if that were true, then we could take if something happens to a Republican or anything else We could just blame this author and say well It was all of your claims that Republicans were election deniers and dangerous threat to democracy You said that and then people went out and they acted on it. Oh, she would say no No, you can't do that because you know, it's not my fault that people acted I didn't tell them to go out and do violence exactly just like after the GOP baseball game shooting Bernie Sanders was asked if he had any culpability and then he said he scoffed at it No, he said if I have to be responsible for everything done by people who support me I'm gonna be apologizing quite a lot thinking a lot of responsibility Which is true and Jake Tapper accepted that everybody accepted that didn't blame him which they shouldn't have But this is just it's a Democrat state propaganda Scrambling just scrambling to try and justify rationalize something in her head to convince The reader or herself. I don't know who that It's completely different when Democrats tonight election results and the fact that Trump asserted without evidence that there was fraud in the 2020 voting and cast out on secure voting systems. That's he's well within his right to do that That's freedom of speech and Democrats going back to 2018 or 2019. There's a video out there showing Democrats just Asking all kinds of questions raising all kinds of questions and doubt about voting machines I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable for researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems Are susceptible to tempering even hackers with limited prior knowledge tools and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes in 2018 electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switch votes from one candidate to another These voting machines can be hacked quite easily. You could easily hack into them It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things But in fact three companies are controlling that it is the individual voting machines that some pose that pose some of the greatest risk There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines Right, which are vulnerable to being hacked I'm sure that there's some reason why that was different when they did it calling Jeffries an election denier is Misleading and complains different issues, but they're not different issues at all Casting unfound the doubt on the outcome of an election is irresponsible either part when either party does it, okay? Which is I guess true at least you're attempting or it seems like she's attempting to hold Consistent standards here, but let's keep reading But I think it's important to remember that the culture around election was quite different before 2020 You see how the word different just keeps popping up and of course they don't explain how or why it's different They just state that it is just like she stated that election denier has taken on a new meaning Just the myopic Perspective of these people I don't know if it's if it's real if they are really just and I believe it with this writer based on the video That we saw of her or are they just like purposely being dishonest they know they're lying They know that they're just spinning prior to the 2020 election many democrats point to evidence of russian interference in the 2016 election What evidence there was no evidence. I mean again What interference was there there was some ads on facebook and pokemon go into what effect did they have Who knows they don't know the fact that trump won the electoral college, but did not win the popular vote again This happens. This is part of our system. We don't choose presidents based on the popular vote And use talking points calling trump not my president But the actions taken by trump and his supporters leading up to the 2020 election and after we're unprecedented They weren't I talked about before the many videos Democrats rioted at bushes inauguration in 2000 They riot and even attacked his motorcade and they rioted at trump's inauguration in 2016 The only difference there was is they had blocked off the center of the capital so they couldn't get in Otherwise there were black clad communists with flags attacking everything in their site Setting cars on fire beating people up injuring police Uh, but that news was left to fall down the memory hole and never to be spoken of again specifically So they can write pieces like this that just completely redefine words and rewrite history trump stokes false conspiracy theories of voter frauds Found more than 60 election related lawsuits and pressured officials to interfere in election results So they're saying this is unprecedented, but it's not filing the lawsuits is not illegal You can say that they were false conspiracies of voter fraud But again democrats claim this voter fraud literally every election that they lose Recent polls have shown that more than half of republicans believe the 2020 election was stolen big deal in 2000 More than half I think around 75 percent of democrats believe that trump did not legitimately win the election And I think around 65 percent of democrats believe that trump Was not a legitimate president as well and was not legitimately elected So again, these things are not unprecedented They're desperately trying here to redefine elections that are and just convince the reader that it's totally different when we do it because Somehow we're when we deny election results were justified and you might have seen that in the view when they were trying to Defend hillary from claiming the election was illegitimate saying that oh well It was and bush was illegitimate See so they just convinced themselves that it's just true when they do it the article ends with this in this day and age I hate that saying it's incredibly easy for the public servants to post something online in a couple years down the road Have to come back to pick it up in public discourse. Okay, but I think that as nature of threats to democracy shift We all need to be vigilant and make sure that we are placing democracy first and politics second I don't even know what that means Making sure that we're placing democracy first and politics second, you know This is just that rationalization I was talking about they can tell themselves that what they're doing here It's just placing democracy first. Yes, they're clearly lying. Yes They're clearly spinning to cover for jeffreys because they can't they just simply cannot hold him to that same standard if they did He might not have gotten that position the first black minority leader by holding him to that standard by calling him a horrible Uh, democracy danger to democracy. He wouldn't probably not have gotten that position So they can't do that and so instead we get these Orwellian kind of redefining of words and rewriting of history And the soaring like kind of gobbledygook language where they just talk about democracy and politics second This is not politics second republicans bad democrats good defending democrats I mean, where do you see the media ever go work this hard to defend a republican from attacks from democrats or from the media? Never it does not happen. It does not happen so Just a an embolism inducing orwellian nightmarish Article from jasmine aguilera here think that's about all I have for that one So I appreciate you all watching if you enjoyed it, please hit that like button and leave a comment to continue the discourse Thanks a lot