 And I think this gives us a good link to talk about Russia. We have the Deputy Minister of Finance with us here. And Sergei, the question is, while we're talking about Africa and talking about the interior, question of security and stability, when we look at Russia today, we are aware. Russia is part of Europe geographically, but it is not part of the political Europe. And that has given rise to economic tensions as well. So continuing on this motive, politics and economics, where do you see Russia standing today here? What does it mean for the growth perspectives in Russia and for the Eurasian Economic Union that has now emerged over the last couple of years? Sergei, please. Thank you for talking back to me. First of all, I'd like to say that I share the opinion which was said at the beginning of our session, that in principle, the global economy is in a good shape, but it's only in principle. The challenges are accumulating, and this is maybe the effect which still needs to be clearly processed and analyzed. The biggest challenges, from my point of view as Deputy Minister of Finance, is that during the last probably six years, we're stating in our final declarations on different levels of Jit Wenta, the ministers or leaders, that that is growing. And it is being said year after year, each half of the year, and still no sign that we will have quite a contrary position. And of course, interest rates environment are stimulating, huge boring, but at the same time, we see another big challenge in this fate. As far as almost 17 trillion of bonds are being sold below principle with negative interest rates, we see big challenges which are facing insurance companies and pension funds. So I wonder what's going to happen in a number of years when these two institutions, very important ones, will need to service their liabilities before pensioners or those who made signed contracts to ensure their activities. In Russia, even in this environment, we enjoy the privilege to use both fiscal policy and monetary policy as we still have the space to use this. We have low debt. We still, far beyond the general level of interest rates, so the central bank can use the monetary policy to slowly go to lower reference rates and to keep the markets ready for the nearest future. But what was most important in my country during the last four years that we prefer to rely as the benchmarks for our internal policy, not the speed of growth or rate of economic growth, but rely mostly on sustainability of growth and inclusiveness. This is the basis which has often been referred to within G20 documents, but for me it was difficult to say whether any other G20 economy is really relying on these benchmarks as the internal policy. In our situation, this has happened. We now passed through the period of low growth rate, but instead we have strong fiscal position and strong monetary positions. We have finally managed to shape banking system and to get rid of poor institutions and stabilize the situation in banking sector, which allows for credit expansion within the private sector. This is more important. But still the most important tool for internal policy is fiscal stimulation. We have now started implementing 12 so-called national projects, which is covering the whole spectrum of internal life. Medicine, education, infrastructure, export promotion, I think like this. Big money are going to be invested from the budget resources and from borrow sources. But on the basis of these national projects, we're expecting that in four years' time the average growth of Russia would be beyond the average growth of the global economy. So it means that we are still looking at the global economy growth as a benchmark, but not the real policy aims. So it's very important in terms of decision-making process. Just a couple of words about China. There's lots of factors that China has become new superpower. From Russia point of view, we enjoy the fact, frankly speaking. We're lying on the fact and it helps a lot in terms of overcoming some difficulties in terms of different economic and financial restrictions. Now we can rely on deep internal bond market in China, for example. Russia's company is already there. The government is still thinking about the possibility to use inland Chinese bond market as a source of funding. But what is more important, we enjoy the privilege to have strong demand for Russia's exports in China's economy. So I remember when I created a new between Russia and China was around 10 billion. Now it's 100 billion. It's happened in less than 10 years. And our aim and our Chinese colleagues' aim is that we will have 200 billion of trade turnover in 2024. So it means that China will definitely become the second trade partner after the European Union for Russia. And just to conclude, maybe with what you've just said at the beginning, whether we really face the challenges of losing multilateral approach to the global governance. I think last year was a very critical one. I remember how it was difficult to negotiate Japan's final declarations in Buenos Aires when we have one superpower blocking all kind of reference to multilateral cooperation and things like this. Nowadays, especially due to the effective management of the situation by Japanese colleagues as the leaders of presidents of G20, the situation slightly changed. Maybe we can be even more optimistic in terms of the fact that multilateralism is not being lost. It's still with us. And this is very important because when you have the global economy, it depends on global value as it changes. And there's strong tendency that almost not one single good is being produced in one single country. It's very important to keep these multilateral cooperations in order and multilateral rules in trade, in particular in order as well. So with this I conclude. Maybe later on we'll come back to the Eurovision Union as you just mentioned. Thank you. Thank you very much. Say it again.