 My name is Yvonne Dothra Leivas and I am a student of Graska and I am a student of Graska. I also employ at the Department of Museum and Archaeology at Carmel County Museum. And I am also doing a PhD and my thesis is called personal item as visual and tactile doors to the past. But today's paper, it has more to do about some reflections I have about my thesis. I am studying the outreach towards schools and what schools have to need from contract archaeology. I am also studying how personal items, especially from urban sites, can be used to improve a better understanding about archaeological knowledge. But today's topic is, like I say, about some reflections I have. What about the content? In line with the national goals for cultural heritage, we are clarifying Sweden, there have been changes in legislation and policy documents. The changes, among other things, result in requirements for outreach for archaeological results, to a wider public in the directives and specifications for contract archaeology. All since several of years in archaeology has a kind of standardized form for outreach business established, which often includes information through social media, guiding of the site, lectures, contact with national media, publications, etc. In more recent years, it is also possible to note the development of the digital knowledge, production and communication with the aim to reach as many different target groups as possible. And upon all that, it is common with educational programs for schools in collaboration and often conducted by educators from local museums. The assignment of contract archaeology usually takes place in a limited period of time in different locations, with different conditions and with different contractors. This often results in temporary solutions of outreach for a specific excavation. The purpose is usually informative, seeking to make awareness about archaeology as such, as through material culture pick out narratives about the past. An effort that often results in a sparing interest about archaeology, the excavation site and the past. An effort often also rewarded with overwhelming positive response. But a sparing interest for archaeology or a sparing interest for the past is not good enough to make contract archaeology relevant for society. One contract archaeology's best defined target groups comprise schools. It is common to receive visits from schools on an excavation site, and then often do they visit with an educational purpose with a framework of school education. When schools visit an archaeological site, they do have a further purpose beyond increase an interest for archaeology and an interest for the past. The school has educational goals to achieve, and for sure they want to learn something they have used for in their education. In general, a critical reflection of an archaeological education and its relevance for school education is lacking in contract archaeology. For archaeology to be relevant for the schools, the sector must become more aware about schools' interest in archaeology. To collaborate with museums isn't enough here. The sector needs to therefore look over and study what more specific can be of interest and relevance for the target groups and match it with what contract archaeology can offer. This could result in more qualitative practices of mediation and increase relevance of contract archaeology in society. Moreover, archaeologists are many times hardly aware of their role as mediators in the process of producing meaning and relevance for their sector and society, many times because they often focus on the preservation of the archaeological record. To work against a one-sided or underbalanced public archaeology, the sector of contract archaeology must put more interest in the interest of the audiences, work more integrated with the public issues and put more effort in doing interest analysis of the target groups. Furthermore, contract archaeology needs to a greater degree approach of public archaeology with a focus on communicative aspects concerning questions about what is mediated and why. This should be both fruitful and instructional relevant in contract archaeology. Not until contract archaeology increases its awareness of what is being mediated and why can contract archaeology achieve these sector goals of heritage management. With that says, I will finish with the words that content matters. Thank you for listening.