 I'm hoping certainly that, you know, we don't get into a kind of a fear, kind of cycle that developed there with this 08 circumstances, but I don't see the basis for that in the sense that this is a dollar depreciation push, I think, on dollar denominated world price trade. And I think there's some really important limits to that is because we've got a huge crop that's out there in the market. Okay, last question. Can I give it to you because there will be a lot running? Okay, Ibu, you will have the last question. She's almost... Yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay. Yes, I agree with what they're just saying about the rise. This is a very political ominous. And that's why most of the government in the rise policy can't be there interfering for the policy of the rise. And my question to Eric, regarding official competition should be open market and then reduce the tariff and reduce the domestic support from the government for the rise production. That's, I think, even in the WTO, we have proposed for the G33, proposed regarding of the special product for the rise. So in the future, I think all the panellists should be, I say for the opinion of the panellists regarding of the political communities of the rise. How we want to incorporate the private sector to this business? Because government cannot spend more national budget for the same improvement in the irrigation, improvement in the R&D. And it should be important the private sector in this business, in this price production. But how we can approach this? Thank you. It certainly is a conundrum, I think, for the global rise market. I mean, you can look at Thailand, for example, very much in terms of the trade perspective, it's very much a private sector driven. But the government, over the last couple of years, decided to intervene with high producer prices and ended up with huge stocks. And that's really put Thailand, and made, I agree with, which I have made it really not the world reference price. Vietnam sort of assumed that role really over the last couple of years. But my sense is that the challenge it seems to me for Asian countries is going to be how do you ease out of the state trading, the desire to want to intervene, and how do you incentivize the private sector to become more active in terms of participation in this market? It's a serious challenge, and again, I don't think there are many easy answers. Because rise is so fundamentally important to welfare and concerns of the population. I just want to add that you don't expect rise to be freely traded in our generation or maybe in the foreseeable future. I think rise always will intervene, both at the production and consumption and at the trade level. I think the only thing I look at is instead of contributing quantitative restrictions like export ban or some sort of thing, if they can convert that into some sort of clarification, that will be much better in terms of stabilizing the market, the other completely staying out of the market. If you keep the market smaller, then any sort of demand or supply of the price has to move that further in terms of the stock. I think the important thing is somehow the global trade volume has to increase. Maybe closer to what we have seen in wheat corn or soybeans from 5 to 10 or 15%, that will stabilize the market much better. Even if we have state intervention, state trading, still it's also good for the market. With that, I would like to close the session and can we thank the panelists for a wonderful talk and answer session. Good evening and I hope you...