 First of all, I would like to say good afternoon to my dear colleagues. I will present part of this One Health initiative, of this new portfolio of investment of CJR, and we are very happy to have Vietnam identified at one of the seven priority countries. As Dieter said, Vietnam is so famous when we talked about One Health at global level, because you have One Health partnership, you have also Vo Hoon and all these institutions looking at One Health. But let's agree on the concept, because many people are not working on One Health in this platform. This is basically an approach. It's not a matter, it's not a discipline. One Health is really an approach that recognizes the interconnections between the three health, human health, animal health and the environment health. So basically we put the human health in the middle and we look at this at the interface with the animals and with the environment. So basically this is a very systematic approach. We look at health of our ecosystem and human. And this initiative is very much in this spirit because the initiative want to generate evidence and develop tools that enable the redesign of food systems to improve human health based on One Health principles. So we have many principles of One Health, but this is about system thinking, it's about integration, it's about interdisciplinary, it's about participation of different partners. And here we emphasize on the food systems and as Vietnamese and some colleagues here, we might be aware also that in our Vietnam it's very much promoting the UN Food Systems Summit and as the Prime Minister Pham Bing Ming attended two days ago as the pre-summit in Rome and we are happy to help to end in this group from CJR to attend that delegation from Vietnam. So why do we need this initiative? Shortly because of several points, but I will be very, very brief. We all know that COVID-19, the biggest pandemic of our time at the moment, Vietnam is suffering very badly for the last two or three weeks. I'm sorry to hear about that. But this is actually is a zoonotic disease, increase the frequency because people who encores the wildlife, habitat and livestock and fish production system identify very much in different place in Vietnam and one way. The second reason is in fact, this zoonotic disease, 60% of the zoonotic disease caused from human side actually is originated from zoonosis partitions and we need to do something about that. We have also global issue of antimicrobial resistance that's so-called AMR killing too many people at the moment. So the estimate is about 700,000 debt a year and the progression is the 10 million debt per year by 2050 if we don't do anything compared to the current situation. The food safety issue is also a big issue in Vietnam. The government pay a lot of attention to that but also the public. And to solve all these complex health issue, we need the integrated approach like One Health and we do One Health here because CJR has been doing that for many years and we have good partnership with Vietnam and other country to do that. So the objective of this initiative or the portrait we can do that is really we want to protect the human health or the interface of human animal and the environment through the better and improvement of detection, prevention and control of zoonotic diseases, football diseases and AMR in developing countries. And how do you do that? You can do that by doing three things in this project. First, we want to generate evidence that enables the risk-based prioritization of different type risk linked to food safety, linked to zoonosis, linked to AMR but also to enable the surveillance and risk mitigation of different stakeholder and also the reinforcement regulation in the countries along the value chain with the food system approach. We can do that through evaluating the impacts of technology, tools and approaches and we are developing these tools or we will use the tools that exist but we will improve this to identify and control zoonosis, AMR, and improve also the food safety and work quality. And finally, as every country CJR work we want to integrate some or more innovations into the programs that the government implementing by this way we can scan up the fighting and innovation. So the context we want to work in these projects is really based on three things. One, we want to look at the risk of infection disease and zoonotic disease on to interface with wildlife. And you know that Vietnam and some Southeast Asian country of course we want to control this wildlife issue and wild animal farming but it's been happening and we want to work on that area. The second area we identify is really is the intensification of food system. Vietnam a spot, more than 40 billion US dollar a year of acrylic products that is very intensified and we want to work on that system. And finally, we are not developed countries. So the informal market and informal food system are very relevant to address this at global level but also at the country level. And we hope, we really hope that through this project three years working in many countries integrating in the program as a country, we expect to reduce from four to 41 billion, a million cases of diseases through this effort of this project. I would like to show you and you don't need to read that obviously because it's too small but we want to rely our research program on the so-called theory of change. We expect things change. We want to identify with whom we work and to achieve at the end the impact areas, the fine impact area of CGI on health, environment, inclusion, equity, et cetera. So that you can have a little bit more details when we work on the work group and we can share this live with you later. In terms of components of the project, we will have five work packages. So three work packages can rely on the main pillar of one health areas, namely zoonosis. The second is the food safety of foodborne diseases. And the third one is the antimicrobial resistance. So basically we want to work to reduce this zoonotic disease, foodborne diseases and the emission of AMR. But we will have also two cross-cutting work packages. The first one you can see on the top work package form is about environment, water and wireless interface. So our colleague from EME would address this with CG and other partners to really improve the aspect of land use and water management to reduce all the health issue in these three pillars vertically. And the last one is about economics, governance and behavior. You will learn more about that. And I have to say that work package four and five on environment and economics is often neglected or not received as enough attention in one health approach. And through this project, we want to do a little bit more, address it more appropriately. So now I would like to invite my colleague to step in, to talk a little bit more about the contents and approach and innovations we want to have. And for the group package one, I would like to invite my colleague, Bernard Bet, who is actually leading the One Health Center in Africa. But he also very familiar to Vietnam because he works on Benji fever and some other diseases in Vietnam. Bernard, over to you. Thanks a lot, Hung. And also the previous presenters, I think it was very good to arrange the two presentations to be done at the same time. Because if you think of zoonotic diseases, actually, it's just a manifestation of many other things which have happened in production, value chains and things. So the focus of this work package is to preempt diseases from spilling over to humans, from animals. And what we had from sampling is a plan by the government to enhance lifestyle production, mainly focusing on pigs and other lifestyle production systems. And when we do that, there's usually some externalities which come out from that production process. And so this work package focuses on two main objectives. So the first one is to preempt these diseases from spilling over. And we are thinking of pandemics, epidemics. These are diseases like COVID, Mars or Nipah viruses, which when they occur, with much more incidents, speed and affecting multiple populations, multiple countries. So the focus of this work package will be to use surveillance as well as identify high-risk production systems and behaviors, which are likely to precipitate these occurrences. And hence, aim to maintain or limit the occurrence of these diseases at the animal level. So that's the main focus. The second objective, of course, is to think of pandemic diseases. Diseases which have been with us for a long time. And we think of Vietnam, we usually work with our colleagues, Fred and other people working on sister-circuses in pigs, there's leptospirosis, there's Japanese encephalitis. And the main purpose there would be to find ways of controlling them to limit the incidence of these diseases to the bare minimum, which will really severely reduce the human health burden. So those are the two main objectives and Peter, we can go to the next slide, just to give you a flavor of two main innovations that we aim to produce. And the first one is to map the distribution patterns of these diseases. And mapping here is not just a physical map, but also mapping where interactions between wildlife, livestock and humans are likely to work. We know in Vietnam and other Southeast countries, there is lots of captive farming which is coming into play. And so we want to identify those value chains and see where is it likely to be that we'll see high risks occurring. So the second objective is to come up with new technologies. For example, diagnostic kits. And I know my colleagues like Fred, they have been aiming to train slaughterhouse workers on how to identify these pathogens before the meat and other products are put in the market. So the main focus would be to come up with new tools which can be used to identify those pathogens before they get into the value chain systems. And as I said, these are just examples. We have many more, but for today we can limit our discussions to those two. So over to you, Hong, thanks a lot. Thank you, Bernard. So the second work package is about food safety. And maybe some of you are aware of the food safety works that Inry and other series centers have been working with partners in Vietnam. I would say that it's not a new research area, but we want to strengthen and continue the good job we have been doing so far, which is a purpose to continue reducing the burden of foodborne diseases. Mainly we meet milk and eggs because we are from one health and animal source food, but we start looking on so as appreciable food, live food and vegetable with other centers, you know? And we wouldn't do that through these informal and traditional food systems. It is very much growing on so to what's the supermarket system as well. And we want to develop the simple technologies and non punitive governance approach implemented along the food value chain from production to consumption, the so-called farm to folks that we will continue really from the farm to slaughterhouse, market and consumption. Next slide, please. The innovations we want to develop, I would say that we would continue the innovation we have been developing. For example, here are two examples among others to support a value chain actors to improve food safety through training certification and promotion of the demands on consumption side, consumer side, and also of government in the development of feasible non punitive approach to regulatory enforcement. So basically in developing countries, we have a lot of laws and regulations sometimes not working in terms of reinforcement. So we need to balance a bit how to introduce this with the more incentive perspective when you introduce intervention. And the second innovation type of things. So we will create the demand to change the behaviors of the farmers, of the food safety actors by introducing a kind of, for instance, a nutshell theory how to push them to change their behavior, but also to introduce a simple context-specific different type of physical condition like course services and containers and raw and cooked food, for example, the intervention we did in Vietnam and Cambodia. So that was something that we want to strengthen in this work package. Third work package is about antimicrobial resistance. And I see many colleagues also working with a different project of INRE and also Dhanida funded project in Vietnam as well. So that is quite interesting areas to work because these immersions of antibiotics resistant both from human side and also animal side are very much linked to the overuse of antibiotics or more generally antimicrobial in livestock development. So we treat from animal side to prevent the human side. And for that, we will use the integrated approach like you can see here bringing the environmental perspective, human perspective, animal production and consumption to reduce the use of antimicrobial in animal system. But also to prevent the environment of pollution and the water system coming in by improving the manual management and better understanding of environment as a reservoir of AMR. So for example here, our colleague Ashne Mutli who's from Denmark, originally, but now she's working at INRE and to leave the CJAMR hub. She will develop with colleagues and with you from Vietnam as well a different type of innovation here to example. The first one is really to generate more evidence on how livestock and fish production and farm profit are affected by reducing antimicrobial use while implementing antibiotics, herd and fish health approaches. So you see we have a colleague from Woon Fish also here, Mohan who will work with Ashne on this side. And the second type of innovation is really to develop and use the ICT-based tool to enable farmers and acrobat dealers and as actors linked to AMR, for example, local veterinarians, for example, to address the livestock diseases, weak cells, use antimicrobials. So that is too much optimistic I think but to reduce really significantly the quantity of antimicrobial to use in this environment. Our colleague Javier from EME is not here but he will leave this component of environment on water and wildlife interface. Here, because we are Vietnamese colleagues, I put the figure of VAC is very famous, a virtual model on garden integration, a garden crop, a fish pond and livestock. But this thing is still working but much more scale in Vietnam now but the ideas from there is really when you identify the crop, the livestock and fish production that will have implication on human health and environmental health. And here colleagues will want to develop methods and approach to improve the land use and water management for the reduction of health risk linked to the agriculture, livestock aquaculture system with the perspective of zoonotic partition and antimicrobial residues and also the wildlife interface because it is also an important areas because many wildlife farming in Vietnam are still happening. This reduce now but it still continue and that represent risk of consumption of this meat but also from wildlife catch and from the nature. Innovation here for example, we will develop kind of different technologies to reduce the risk when we use the safe water, we use wastewater in our country to reduce the risk on the downstream of the user. For example, reduce a lot of bacteria, contamination to improve the water quality or we can develop also business model for resource recovery and reuse of animal waste. So this is these kind of things of innovation. I would like to invite Peter to turn on the camera and mic and say a few words maybe on the wildlife perspective shortly so that we can serve as a good input for the discussion later for this project. Yeah, thanks Hong and pleasure to see you all on the call Vivian everybody else, Charlie, good to see you. Yes, it's quite interesting when you think about the involvement of wildlife as a risk for infectious diseases. We all think about pandemics and emerging diseases but those are quite rare events and there are some other diseases that we know wildlife that are eaten can run a risk of. So I think one of the goals that we're trying to look at is how can we assess the risk of different systems that have a connection through to wildlife? We think about places like Vietnam where there is significant farming of wildlife and it's mixed with domestic animals as well. So there's a potential for pathogens to move across from one species to another. How does that affect risk in those countries? We think about communities that depend on wildlife for food and whether some of those species that are eaten have a risk of zoonotic diseases, both known and new ones. So one of the strategies is to look at that risk and try and find clever ways to assess how risky a certain activity is and then whether you can look at people's and understanding of the incentives for eating those species or for farming them and look at ways to do that that reduces the risk. So that's the strategy and that's the approach. We're also gonna do a little bit of work hopefully on trying to test some species to see what pathogens they carry as a potential risk. So we're at the very early stages of working out how to do that but I think that this is a great opportunity to give a realistic approach, recognizing that a lot of communities depend on wildlife, that it has great value and that farming systems, if done in the right way, can actually reduce the risk of zoonoses. So rather than to go down the fear-mongering approach but to actually work with communities and local policymakers to understand what systems are being put in place and how they can be done and why that reduces the risk. Thanks very much, Charles. So as I said from the beginning, that is the last but not least work packages feel important because we have not done enough in one health. The ideas of this economics, governance and behavior, work packages really to redevelop and test different type of, to evaluate the effect of capacity-beending incentive and to monitor also on behavior of value-check actors along the value chain but also government people to provide the support or oversight for relevant sector through randomized evaluation. You see randomized evaluation is at high level and efficient and trustful evaluation of what we can introduce in one health and we will work more to assess the cost-benefit analysis the different model economic impact of the pandemics and control measure and so that we can come up with policy guidance for the government and different level of authorities. For example, here, the two innovation proposed by this work package is really to look at the performance management and the accountability of system for public servants responsible for implementing surveillance and reinforcement of AMR and food safety regulation. So we can, if we have a lot of experience to help governments in doing this kind of thing and we want to do that. And for example, another type innovation is really to develop systems to facilitate compliance of small scale producers, trader or vendors of livestock and our aquaculture products which food safety, AMR and animal waste management standards. So it's come back to the issue of food safety I explained before, it's really the question of incentive. How to incentivize people to comply to change their behavior, to improve the areas of the thing we work. Why do we select Vietnam and seek other countries? So we apply a prioritization process to do that. And in those three years, not very long period for a research project, we want to be efficient. We identify that because, you know this country have a very strong interest from government side in one health and the partnership with existing CJR relationship among 15 centers, we have 10 centers operating in Vietnam at the moment. So it's very good critical mass in Vietnam. And also we look at the intensification system of animal production and wildlife involvement in food systems. So that's why we have Vietnam, we have India, Bangladesh, in Asia. We have Tanzania, we have Ethiopia, Uganda and Kenya in East Africa, Angkor Devo in West Africa for specific context. And the research, question, innovation and teams are selected really based on the potential for longer impact and on human infectious disease burden reduction. And for that, I think that this meeting would be very important to mobilize the input from Vietnamese colleagues to improve this proposal. So last slide, I just want to say that we are working on this proposal development with CJR centers, you know that we are Inri, Yipri, Yimian, one fish but we bring also external partners from Liverpool University Ecohealer Alliance that more on the wildlife side and the public health side but also the Center for Scientific Research in Côte d'Ivoire for coordination on the aspect of West Africa. And of course, you know, the Vietnamese partner and other national partner are not there yet but that will be part of the discussion how to mobilize and engage with you in this project. We start, I think that I know we end our presentation on one hand initiative time speeder and politics.