 Suzanne may have the answer, illegal trade. So Suzanne, seriously, an increasingly important part of the world economy or concern about the world economy is growing importance of illegal trade. So why don't you give us a perspective on how you see that as fitting into the international economic environment? Thank you, Jeff. So the lens in which I see economic challenges might seem a little bit short-sighted or a little bit narrow as compared to everyone else, because my career has been in law enforcement and prosecuting and investigating organized crime and financial criminals. But along with that has come the opportunity to work on policy issues across the globe with Africa, Asia, South Africa, South America. And what we've learned is that our similarities in this area of law enforcement are greater than our differences and that really our goals are almost universal. The challenges, of course, are how to reach those goals. So when I talk about the global effects of illegal trade, I'm here to say that it absolutely taints every country. It weaves countries together unwittingly, unwillingly, in alliances that are woven by the efforts of unscrupulous criminals and organized crime groups and preys upon the weaknesses of the infrastructures and legislation. It promotes greed and corruption and ultimately affects the financial systems, reputations, and economic stability, taints the, with all of the massive amounts of money that are generated through illegal trade, that money has to go somewhere. It has to go into the financial system. It has to go into assets and to continue on with these organizations. So just some basic thoughts when I'm talking about illegal trade or trafficking and the impact on the economy, there's little hard evidence on the totality of the scale and amounts because obviously countries, industries look at a specific thing that is most pressing to them at the time. But just to look at some of the top revenues producing illegal trades, the amounts are absolutely jaw-dropping. Illegal drugs, $320 billion. And we're talking a year. Counter-fitting, $460 billion of various goods. Human trafficking costs $150 billion. Wildlife trafficking, $23 billion. Timber trafficking, $10 billion. Organ trafficking, $1 billion per year. And these figures are cold cash, if you will. They don't take into account the effect of the human toll and the reputational toll, the death involved. As I said for obvious reasons, governments particularly tend to focus on the thing that is most harmful to them at the time in terms of trade, whether it is drugs, wildlife, nuclear trafficking, whatever, if it's all materials. But I don't think that you will be surprised to know that criminals aren't so discreet, so discriminating. And what we've seen in the world of illegal trafficking is that once there is a pipeline in place, once I can get from country A to country B and the pipeline can maintain below the radar, I can find a criminal group to send various types of products through that pipeline, whether it is wildlife trafficking, whether it's humans, whether it's organ trafficking, just to have the pipeline in place with the various organizations. I mentioned at the outset that one of the things that happens with illegal trade is that it forges partnerships between unwitting countries, whether they're neighboring countries or whether their country's quite on opposite continents, on opposite sides of the world. And the links are forged by organized crime, which we could call a new global enterprise. They've assessed the demand, who wants it, and they've assessed the supply, who has it. And they spend their enterprise developing how to run this below the radar of law enforcement. They have a supply chain. They create new lines. They co-opt old ones. And they spread enough payoffs to the vulnerable or the greedy to ensure that the organizations continue on with this large billion dollar payouts. And as has always been the case with law enforcement, the bad guys have more money, more tools, more guns, and sometimes more influence, sadly, in one state, one country, or a region to pour into the issue of illegal trade. If I've totally depressed you, please have heart. Because I think there is a basic calculus about how to move forward. And then one thing that I see that is really possibly an answer. So the basic thing that we look to the aspirational, holistic approach, if you will, is to enhance private sector engagement, to fine-tune legislation, to increase the training for judges, prosecutors, investigators, to understand the drivers for the consumer demand, and invest in public awareness, and to the extent possible for those countries that find themselves in these sad, unwitting partnerships, to really have the conversation, to collaborate, to cooperate, to share information as much as possible. As I said, these are sort of aspirational. And they have to. We can't just do one without the others. They sort of march along together. But the one thing I will leave you with that I believe is the sort of coming potential answer. But it's certainly part of the solution is public-private partnerships. When we now, we've heard sadly of countries and leadership gaps, and that ongoing problem. But what we do see are industries that are sort of stepping up. And they're not just looking at their discrete interests. This is my project. This is the thing I'm concerned about. But they are instead looking to forge relationships with the civil society, with NGOs, with governments, for the sort of greater good, for the bigger issue of combating trade. And I think that that is really an answer to the problem. So thank you. Thank you, Suzanne. One thing I'd point out, which you alluded to briefly, is that illegal trade is not just a problem from the standpoint of the international trading system, but that much of this illegal trade, particularly in drugs, has given rise to a real distaste in a lot of countries for existing governments that don't seem to be able to control it. If we look whether in the Philippines or in Latin America, other parts of the world, at least some portion of the kind of populist upsurge that we've seen has been in response to the sense that the government can't control things like drug trafficking. So I think it is not just a problem for the international trading system. It's a problem for the national governments of many of the countries of the world. And a very serious problem, we have only to look at the current campaign, presidential campaign, in Brazil to see what happens when a country starts to lose control of illegal activities within its borders. So thank you for that.