 We will now read two statements that set out committee's findings. On behalf of the committee, I would like to make the following statement in relation to a complaint against an MSP. The committee has considered a complaint from Councillor David Aitcheson o Alexander Burnett MSP. The complaint is that Alexander Burnett MSP failed to declare his registered business interests when submitting a written parliamentary question. The committee is unanimous in the decisions that are reached on the complaint. Firstly, it agrees with the findings in fact and the conclusion of the commissioner. Secondly, it admonishes Alexander Burnett for has failed to make a declaration of a registered financial interest when giving notice of two parliamentary questions. The committee does not consider that the breach justifies the imposition of sanctions on Alexander Burnett on this occasion. The committee believes that the declaration of registered interests in any matter before taking part in proceedings of the Parliament relating to that matter represents an important aspect of parliamentary transparency and accountability. The committee issued a reminder to all members of the responsibilities to declare relevant interests in March this year. The breach for which Alexander Burnett has been found responsible occurred before this, and the committee is minded therefore to be lenient on this occasion. However, the committee will consider the full range of sanctions available for it for any future breaches of this nature. Full details of the complaint and the commissioner's investigation of it will be included in the committee's report, which will be published later this afternoon. I now move to the statement regarding a complaint against Rachel Hamilton MSP and Jackson Carlaw MSP. On behalf of the committee, I would like to make the following statement in relation to a complaint against two MSPs. The committee has considered a complaint from Stuart McMillan MSP about Rachel Hamilton MSP and Jackson Carlaw MSP. The complaint alleged that the respondents sought political advantage by making public comments on a committee report prior to its formal publication on 6 February 2017. It was alleged that this amounted to a breach of the confidentiality requirements of the code of conduct for MSPs. The commissioner for ethical standards and public life investigated the complaint and concluded that, based on the information provided to him, neither members were in breach of the code. The committee is unanimous in the decisions reached on the complaint. It agrees with the findings, in fact, and conclusion from the commissioner that Rachel Hamilton MSP and Jackson Carlaw MSP did not breach the code of conduct. While no breach of conduct has taken place on this occasion, the committee wishes to remind all members of the confidentiality provisions in the code of conduct. It is the responsibility of members to ensure that support staff are similarly aware. Full details of the complaint and the commissioner's investigation of it will be concluded in the committee's report, which will be published later this afternoon. Thank you, and we now move into private session.