 What is going on guys welcome back to channel critical overload here some time I'll scream six in this video here today and talk about Radio silence recent comments tired Tyler Gillette specifically. I believe he stated this in a recent interview I'll leave a link to it in description talking about the need to subvert our expectations and taking risk in order to do that now You know, it's just like a sentiment like that while I know there's gonna be intent behind it to then you know try to pull the rug out from under your audience from Every which way possible to achieve that with some type of viewers like myself I think is now impossible and I'll go into a little bit of as to why that is after I read this Quote that they had given he stated that this movie has to be willing to risk it all in order to subvert all of Those expectations and we're so far down the rabbit hole of screen movies that it's all up for grabs at this point So again just to talk about that really quick for someone like myself I think that's impossible the reason I think that's impossible is because I think that When you come when it comes down to watching certain type of movies and you know Identifying certain things and certain cues that will lead you to appropriately predict Who is who and who is going to end up being this character later on and who's gonna die And you know what the motive is gonna be I think that someone who studies these movies front and back They're not gonna be you're not gonna be very successful at subverting their expectations unless You somehow do something that I know everyone would be against which would include One of the legacy characters that are now left being the killer Which again, Sydney Prescott being ghost face not gonna happen and then Gail What is being ghost face not gonna happen? But again, that's just something I'm talking about anything else I'll find it very hard to believe that they could do that in a way that Makes me go like oh my gosh. I'm so shocked all these movies are enjoyable. They're all very well made for the most part But as far as like being shocked by them I don't think I've actually been shocked by a screen movie So much since the Mrs. Loomis reveal now with Roman, of course That was a little bit more of just like huh and they're like, oh This is a little bit interesting and then it grows on you, of course I have my gripes of scream through I do think is the weakest one But as far as like just any of them shocking me that hasn't happened since scream 2 I just think that the twist with that character of Debbie salt and how she was here and gone Throughout the movie and then bam you got that big reveal, you know If you can pull something off like that in scream 6 then sure I think you have a chance of subverting my expectations if you do something like that But at this stage, you know, I just think with the internet and all that stuff There's no way that I'll be someone who is just floored about whatever. I'm presented in a screen movie But you know, I'm of course gonna recognize that they're of course most likely talking to the general audience Who was not digging and studying scream religiously like some of us But one thing they could do is Again, which I talked about doing in screen 5 Do it in screen 6 do it at some point. Let a ghost-faced killer get away with it Let a ghost-faced killer get away with it maybe we're presented with the idea or the narrative of two killers and That's what we are sold all the way through the movie and that's how the movie even ends We end the movie with two killers being caught Everything's done and they're put behind bars or they're killed but then your movie continues to play out and at the very end of it you give us a give us a Indication and just a very clear answer that there weren't just two killers. There were indeed three Now you're leaving us with the mystery of well Who was the third killer and what I mean by that is maybe it's done in a way that confirms And not only was there a third killer, but it's one of the surviving characters Factor it into this narrative or you could just like do it in a way that makes you question So one of the surviving cares of obviously I don't think it should be some like random character that they introduced in scream 7 I think it should be someone who's introduced in scream 6 And then maybe you kind of built this narrative where they could be like a Debbie salt type of character They seem like they don't have really big connections to anything, but they're hearing gone the next second and then in scream 7 they they're back and They come to be this big Mastermind or something that was tied to scream 6 and maybe they had something to do with the events of scream 4 This could be even where Tara's dad comes into the mix because they did say that we'll be meeting Tara's mom and scream 6 But they didn't mention her dad So maybe they could do something like that that's building up to Tara's dad and Sam Tara's dad because Sam's dad's Billy Tara's dad being the killer in scream 7 and maybe he had some type of connections with what went on in scream 5 And then scream 6 and now ultimately scream 7 they could do something like that Where you don't reveal that third killer because I know a lot of you want to see something different where there's a third killer and Maybe they do it in a way in which you see that there are clearly multiple killers But this time the multiple killers is not just to it's in fact more than two You don't find that out though until the very end of the movie the movie could still end on a happy note And that's all fine and dandy, but as far as just like Having two killers I think it would be nice to kind of go away from that and have a third killer Teased at the very end of the movie before the movie ends on a high note with our characters going off to the sunset And then we get whatever cool little in-credits set up we get with the with the music playing in the background You know all that good jazz But just tease that there's a third killer that was working in scream 6 and you don't find out who this person is Amongst the surviving characters that you've already been introduced to in screen 6 until screen 7 That's a good way to build intrigue. It's a good way to get your audience kind of curious and thinking about Oh, well, what is going on? Who is this person? How do they factor into it? I again don't know exactly how I would portray it on screen But I think that's something that maybe a lot of you would agree with that Instead of revealing all three killers for those of you who want that third killer Save the third killer for screen 7 find a narrative that works Wolf wolf them into the fabric of this trilogy you're talking about and again if it's Tara's dad Maybe they have something to do with screen 5 and again They could go about how they were involved with screen 6 and how they even managed to do all of that pull that off without being caught Without having those who got caught Rating them out like just going into a little bit in-depth detail about how that all came to be as well I Think that's one thing they could do to subvert your expectation Give you two killers, but then say hey, no, there weren't two killers They were three but you're gonna have to wait till the 71 That's the thing I think a lot of people would probably prefer to see aside from Gale or Sydney being the killer Gale or Sydney dying some random twist. It doesn't make sense You know stuff like that this third killer should be teased and then save for screen screen 7 Don't give us all three and scream 6 but let me know if you guys think about that down in the comment section below If you haven't already, of course, make sure you subscribe turn on post notification image video in the description I'll leave some social media accounts on Facebook Twitter and Instagram you can message me there Of course the limiters any movies news or reviews you let me to cover in the future with all that in my guys I will see you in the next video