 placed populations to assist the victims of the armed conflicts through increased medical assistance and beefing up our medical activities. And this has to be done in a framework which allows us to do more in Gaza over the next couple of days and weeks. At the same time, we will continue to engage with all parties of this conflict for the better respect of international humanitarian law and of the values of humanity in warfare, of course. The best thing which can happen to protect and assist people is that the ceasefire continues and that a humanitarian space is reconstituted so that humanitarian operators can work freely to assist and protect people. But we cannot exclude that this is not happening. We cannot take it for granted that the ceasefire will continue. Therefore, in any case, we will have to see how best we can increase the humanitarian space so as to address in a more meaningful way the expectations of the victims on all sides. I think over the past two or three days, I have once again been aware of the fact that there are things that humanitarian actors can do and there are limits of the mandate of humanitarian action and obligations of states and political actors to find political solutions for political problems. And I said to all interlocutors that we are determined to stretch the boundaries of humanitarian action to increase the space for humanitarian action, but we need also the political support for impartial and independent humanitarian action. So the conversations I had in Gaza, in Ramallah, in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem all turned around how to increase assistance in the areas I mentioned, but also on how to increase the respect for international humanitarian law, and this is the core of our mandate. I think the objective of this trip was to put the plight of the civilian population centerpiece and center stage. There is a lot of political debate around this conflict and I think it was important for me as a president of ICRC to come here and say, first and foremost, we have to focus on the impact of that conflict on victims and to try to increase our response. This was the objective and I think I'm rather encouraged from the circumstances in which I came, ceasefire which is holding at the present moment and hopefully will hold longer, but I also am moderately optimistic from the signs of goodwill that I have encountered in all places to engage with the ICRC to make our assistance and protection more meaningful. So I would like to give you the opportunity to ask questions and I will try to respond together with my colleagues. Yes, this issue has been a subject in the talks and I made it clear to all sides that the determination of ICRC to continue Palestinian prisoners and our willingness to continue to visit prisoners with all authorities in the region is unbroken and it is very clear that we wish as we do in all conflicts of the world to have access within a meaningful time frame to all people which have been detained in the context of the armed conflict. So yes. Well as I mentioned beforehand, the issue of conduct of hostilities by all parties has been a core issue of all the exchanges I had in all places that I visited over the past three days. And when I say the conduct of hostilities, this means that we had meaningful exchanges with all authorities on the principle of proportionality, distinction and precaution. And this is at the end of the day at the core of what we consider being the confidential dialogue that we have with all sides in order to ensure that the law is respected and is better respected in the future. As I mentioned beforehand, the Geneva Convention has been designed to protect and assist people and I cannot be satisfied that I must be frustrated when after four weeks of armed conflict we see the amount of destruction and the amount of victims which I saw and which we have all witnessed out of these conflicts. So there is a huge element of tension. So you can only explain this tension by the fact that the law hasn't been accurately and ambitiously implemented in this armed conflict. But at the same time I want to be clear, ICRC does not prematurely jump to conclusion and blame the one side or the other side. We will review and revisit on the basis of own data and of own information that we have together with all sides what has happened over the past couple of months, of weeks in order to ensure what the necessary steps are. To ensure that in the next or future use of force that this amount of victims is not again coming to us and therefore the gap between what the law says and expects us to ensure and the reality of the conflict that this gap is narrowed. Can you speak more specifically about the use of medical facilities, because there are two issues on both sides, Israel of discriminatory attack on medical facilities and Israel was accusing the mass of using them to show that operations speak specifically about that now or later? Well, what I would like maybe is to say two things. We will on the basis of our own data which show some of those difficulties and which illustrate some of the problems that you have mentioned going to details with the parties in order to understand what has happened when hospitals were targeted and medical workers were targeted. We have lost Palestinian Red Crescent colleagues who have worked as medical colleagues who have worked as humanitarian workers close or in the medical services and we want to know what exactly has happened. And what exactly has happened, it is incontested to me that many of the things which has happened around hospitals and around medical workers and around humanitarian workers shouldn't have happened. It is not possible that humanitarian workers and Palestinian Red Crescent colleagues are killed in the execution of their mandate. So we want to know what has happened. But we will in the methodology and how we will execute our mandate, we will raise these issues on the basis as I said of our testimonies and collection of data and raise these issues with the parties concerned. Let me just also say one thing. Because it is a little bit more general context, you want it specific, but it is also important in that context. ICRC has launched more than a year ago a global campaign which is called healthcare in danger and we have launched it because in many conflicts of the world we see now that hospitals and medical workers and doctors are targeted in military operation and therefore around the principle of distinction and targeting. There are problems which are much more structural than just accidental. And this is the reason why we want to see what has happened here very carefully and also to compare it with the context of other conflicts which are of a great worry to us. Not to speak about Syria where we have articulated many times and complained what has happened. But again with regard to the specifics we will keep that in our dialogue with the parties concerned. Please. We have spoken about international violations, you have said that healthcare workers should not be killed trying to do their job, but when you say that do you mean Hamas for sure you are next to them or Israel for attacking them while healthcare workers are nearby? Which, are you speaking about both parties here or one in particular? And my second question is that you said you spoke about an investigation that you were doing in the context of other conflicts. What is that investigation for? Is it an internal investigation for you or is it an investigation that you are then getting handed to somebody who is so too? Well our standard operation procedure with regard to the conduct of hostility is that to the best possible we collect own data and the experience of what has happened on the ground. And our people have been on the ground over the past couple of weeks and we will collect all information that we have and try to understand the dynamic of the military operations. And we cannot give general judgments on responsibility before we have watched at each and every context and situation because many contexts may have a different dynamics and different responsibilities attached and we will only engage the parties on the basis of very precise information and understandings on what has happened around some of the critical situations that we have witnessed and which are, which you have witnessed as well and which are in the public space. Our procedure is that we write confidential report with recommendations attached and these confidential reports remain confidential, they go to the parties concerned and we work with them in order to implement the recommendations we make. I was wondering if you can explain as to which are right now the main priorities in the military government, the system and treatment right now, the hospitals and the different facilities together and if you are learning as well which are the main priorities in Africa regarding people on the ground. On your first question let me just say that obviously we are in an extremely volatile situation. If you would have asked me the questions four days ago, the response would be fundamentally different from the response I give you today but I don't know whether tomorrow morning the situation will be the same. What I can tell you is from what we know also from our own people and surgeons who have been in hospital that there have been situations of intensive armed conflict which have led to enormous challenges for the hospitals in Gaza with waiting rooms and difficult choices to make for the doctors in whom to treat first because we couldn't cope with all the numbers. If you ask me of today and what I have seen yesterday in two of the hospitals in Gaza due to the ceasefire and the fact that the flow of victims has stopped, the new flow of victims have almost stopped, the situation has considerably improved. So if you ask me today as of now our priority is to strengthen the capacities and capabilities of the present infrastructure in Gaza which we think that if this situation with regard to the ceasefire is continuing or well equipped to deal with the cases which we find there are some particularly specialized cases and heavy cases in which maybe one or the other international expertise can bring an invaluable add-on to help patients. So our priority at the present moment is to ensure that sufficient medical instruments and medical material and consumables are being imported. We don't have any particular problem at the present moment to import, if I understand, medical equipment, neither to import medical equipment nor consumables. But we have also to be very careful because of the volatility of the situation which suddenly would force us to again be prepared to a completely different scenario but I don't want to speculate with regard to this scenario. With regard to Ebola, this is of course an issue which is not first and foremost at the forefront of ICRC's mandate but we are working very closely within the Red Cross and Recrecent movement as well as with WHO to ensure that wherever ICRC has accesses and knowledges and competences to support the National Society as well as WHO activities to cope with the issue of Ebola, we are here to support them. We are present in places where there are suspicions of Ebola or where we have accesses and networks that are valuable for WHO and for the National Societies and we are in constant contact within the Red Cross and Recrecent movement as well as with WHO to respond in Liberia and in other places to this issue and to this challenge. Jacques, anything we should add from our side? Thanks a lot. Yes, it's important. It's a legacy, a legacy. Thank you.