 I'd like to welcome everyone here to our annual meeting with the Organization of Agreement States and the Conference of Radiation Control and Protection Directors. I want to thank all the panelists for traveling here this morning, and we provided nice weather for you today. I hope you will notice. To provide your perspectives, this means a good opportunity to discuss topics that are relevant and important to our mutual efforts to ensure the safety and security of radioactive materials in the United States. With over 86 percent of the nation's radioactive materials licensees being licensed and inspected by the agreement states, it's imperative that we continue to strengthen our partnership as it relates to regulatory controls and oversight of radioactive materials in the country. I'd also like to take this opportunity to commend the agreement states' leadership and work on various active working groups related to rulemaking, guidance development, and policy development. The regulatory process, of course, benefits from your continued participation. So we have a full agenda this morning, and many important topics to cover. So I ask that you be mindful of the time and keep to your seven minutes. And let me see if any of my fellow commissioners has any comments. No? Okay, great. So I will start off, then, by introducing Mr. Mike Welling, who is the chairperson of the Organization of Agreement States. Turn it over to you. Madam Chair and Commissioners, thank you for the opportunity to present on behalf of the Organization of Agreement States. I'd like to discuss with you several topics in the regulatory arena concerning 10 CFR Part 37, security, and 10 CFR Part 35, medical, and reports regarding these topics. 10 CFR Part 37 regulations were enacted in 2013 after several years in the rulemaking process. OAS thanks the NRC for inviting us to be involved in development of Part 37 from the beginning, including us in numerous working groups and meetings that occurred during those years. In particular, OAS was involved in the Part 37 working groups, which abandoned 2008, met numerous times over those years, and completed its task in 2012. Many issues and concerns were raised and discussed, and OAS is thankful that most of these were addressed. We look forward to implementing state equivalent regulations to Part 37 in the next two years and continuing discussions with the NRC on improving security of category one and two quantities of radioactive materials. Regarding Part 35, deliberations and changes to 10 CFR Part 35 began in 2011. The OAS is represented on the Part 35 working groups, the Advisory Committee on the Medical Use of Isotopes, or ACMEWI, and the Standing Committee on Compatibility. The OAS has provided many comments and suggestions through these avenues. The OAS remains concerned that the Commission has recommended a designation of compatibility B for 10 CFR 35.3045, medical event reporting definition. The OAS wholeheartedly disagrees with this determination that does not understand how this can be considered a transboundary issue. Deserving compatibility B designation since a medical event is a single event affecting a patient whose treatment occurred at a fixed location. The SEC recommended on March 27, 2013, that the NRC retain the existing compatibility C designation for the medical event definition. The OAS also made the same comment in our comment letter dated February 28, 2013. Lastly, I would like to touch on reports regarding the security of sources. In 2012, the GAO released a report concerning security of radiological sources at U.S. medical facilities. In this report, the GAO information was in places inaccurate and did not include mitigating information in situations where GAO concluded there was poor security. Currently, the GAO is preparing a report regarding security of industrial sources. And OAS urges the NRC to ensure the GAO industrial reports contains accurate information and statistical data and relevant information when discussing perceived security risks. Additionally, last month, the Low Level Waste Forum released a report titled Report of Disuse Sources Working Group. This report faulted the NRC and OAS for several failures, including having insufficient regulatory controls and inadequate source tracking systems. The OAS is recommending that NRC provide a response to the NNSA GTRI as this report was funded by them regarding the Low Level Waste Forum report.