 good morning this is the redevelopment authority meeting of Wednesday July 7th and starting to my right let's introduce yourselves please I am Roberta Likipaneski the chair Chad Peleshek planning director and in our audience we have community TV media thank you very much appreciate that we will call the meeting to order and if everybody stands we'll pledge to the flag I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all thank you does anyone on the authority have a potential conflict of interest hearing none we shall begin chair will entertain a motion to approve the minutes from the June 16th 2021 meeting it's been moved and seconded are there any additions or corrections hearing none all those in favor say aye aye chair votes aye opposed motion carries okay discussion and possible action on the quarterly update of business loans and you have a document in front of you Chad you want to talk us through some of this sure so the first page everything that's in green is current a couple things to note is that the park the pod job properties one near the fourth from the bottom was paid off in paid in full in April so that one will be leaving us e-power manufacturing is one that's past due and the finance department has not received a response when they contacted them on two occasions they did send a partial payment of $1,500 last week but their monthly payment is $2,794 12 so I think at this stage we would recommend not taking any action on it they did make a partial payment maybe it's a cash flow issue or something timing of contracts or something of that nature so we'll see if it continues and the next quarter okay thank you and the back so Old World Creamery they they make regular payments it's I think it's the timing of when they cut their checks and when we invoice them because they're always a month behind but they catch up so the finance department is going to be issuing monthly invoices now through our munis system so they're hoping that that will get them on track so I don't think we need to take any action on them we game on they've attempted to contact them twice haven't received a response or a payment so I don't know if that one continued that we game on is Justin Webb Sun graphic media Sun media whatever graphics he opened up that we game on center down that gaming facility on Indiana Avenue that you'll recall they were a number of months behind the last time in the city attorney's office sent a letter to them and they did make a payment and get current but now they are again two months past due and then the last one is HH two properties that's forgiven through July yet so we'll be working with Paul going forward okay any questions about the I will just couple just a couple positives from the finance department three sheep sent us a check for twelve thousand nine hundred eighty three dollars last week their payment is five thousand so they are paid well in advance and they applied it to the principal through the first of December so they'll work with them to make sure that's what they were intending to do and the sign shop has not made a late payment also the the sign shop was questioning some late payment fees we told them that we didn't have jurisdiction to write those late fees off so we're hoping that they're gonna ultimately pay them but we'll work through that okay I noticed that the report looks different than same data but looks different is this the new system or not it's a combination yes okay there will be a the munis system will allow our business loan folks to go in on the computer look at what's due look at whether they're current a lot more interactive and hopefully we'll keep everything together and flowing smoothly okay any other questions nothing do we need to make a motion no okay item 3.2 discuss and possible action on the development opportunity related to port skate apartments port skate apartments phase three in the South Pier district we have seen this we have seen the developer before this this project has been in front of us before we have sent the developer back to inquire with the businesses on South Pier about his development and he did so so Chad you want to tell us what happened Joe are you online I am oh good Joe Grosh so good morning so what what you guys had tasked Joe with was going out and contacting all the businesses on South Pier and making sharing his proposed plans with them and talking about what his project was so he has sent notice to every business on South Pier as well as a copy of this map the city has not received any communication and nor has Joe I don't believe is that correct Joe correct so at this stage we're here to talk about your interest in moving forward and I guess at this stage what I would do is turn it over to Joe to talk about his proposed plan I have provided copies to everybody in person on the plan Joe so we have them before us so if you just want to talk about what you're proposing the the total project is 28 units as shown it's possible that it could be 32 units the South building is a 12 unit building that we could say would be closest to save one phase one or would be along Blue Harbor Drive to the South Lakeview or the old spaceport building the triple play building to the north of the triple play building we have an 8 unit and a 12 unit building it's possible that those one of those could be an additional four units so we're just not sure we have to see on how does how the site lays out the we're not terribly excited about the building along Lakeview but we think if we can add a bunch of landscaping along Lakeview in whether it's you know in front of the right-of-way or outside of the right-of-way I think that building can be a ice building it has great views either side of it just we have to try to do something to block the parking lot view off of Lakeview we have plenty of parking we have plenty of green that was something that the previous meeting brought up and we'll be working with the city on the modification of the parking lots specifically in regards to that we're gonna be losing a total of 84 stalls now the parking study that both the city and we initiated calls for an allowable reduction of parking of up to 150 stalls so we're losing only half of what they are telling us is our allowable cushion so in our perspective I think that's a that's a very nice buffer and Chad did we share the technical memorandum from TDI to the RD members so they can see that yes it was attached to the agenda item okay good does anybody have any questions I do this is a one-story or two-story this is the exact same as the existing product that's out there the only thing that might be we might work with the city to see if they want some different variation of colors but it's the exact same building all right thank you any questions from the sorry chair so Joe do you want to address what your intent your ask is as it relates to purchasing the land sure when we did the original project we had our our deal that we was negotiated was $3,000 per developed unit and for that deal four years ago we we had a $1 lease for 10 years and then the land payment was due upon expiration of 10 years what we're looking for here is just $3,000 a unit for the land purchase and then we'll we'll close as soon as we receive our approvals with the city of Sheboygan so we're looking the same dollar amount but we we are not looking for the payment terms as we had on the original phase so it'll be between I think right around right around if we go 32 units it'll be right around $96,000 for the land but the purchase is very important as we do own and have successfully purchased the other property for a Portscape so this is an important that we have this as a purchase I recall from the original Portscape development that it was phased in will you phase building one and building two in for this or will they both simultaneously yeah we're good I think Roberta we're gonna try to this will be something that I don't think will happen this year I think it's possible but I don't think I just don't think you know I just don't think we have enough time but we would we would undergo construction more and likely next year and have occupancy for 2023 so we all buildings would go away okay chair so if that's our DA has any other questions we're happy to answer them otherwise I think the motion is gonna be to direct staff to work with the developer on a purchase and sale agreement and bring that final document back to this body I guess I would have a question just about valuations you know this is a historic legacy price and is there any should we be looking at fair market value now and I'm not sure how that's determined but just seems 96,000 for the size of that property in a you know I think phase one for Portscape in phase two might have been more risky just because of things so you know we were looking at that point in time for development and now it seems like it's it's probably more stable and should we be going back and just asking because if we're not willing to subsidize other folks in development we shouldn't probably be looking to subsidize these folks sure we can have a conversation I can have a conversation with Mike Grotta there is a you know standard five dollars per square foot charge that was on the inside so I can find out what that equates to to that three thousand dollars per unit and and then talk to Mike Grotta and see what he's got the other stuff assessed at and see how it compares and that will come back to this committee yes it could if it's somewhere in the you know if it's somewhere in the same range we may work on a trying to iron out some details in a development agreement and then bring that back or we can come back before that whatever way you guys want to handle it yeah one the other piece was the use of green space that you know can't be recaptured and I think we talked about green space along the river we talked about parking and what impact that was going to have on the local businesses and I don't know if it's proper to say no response is a positive response because was it only a letter that went out or was there actual interviews done for for the business owners Joe Joe didn't you talk to businesses first and then you sent letters no what we did is we sent out a letter we sent out the site plan we also sent out the included is in with included with the package the the parking evaluation that was completed so anybody who got that packet who cared to read it had a very detailed analysis and explanation of what we were doing why we were doing it and what the impact on parking would be and we've heard no comments I mean I guess we can go in and talk to each individual business but I mean that's how the city I mean it's usually due diligence I mean we asked him to do that they did it I just know that you know a lot of times with mail you know does it get appropriately addressed or is it you know something that now is shocking because somebody didn't take the time to at least on the proximity of where this is located knock on a few doors and say hey do you have an issue of course at that point in time it might create an issue just because you're asking a question but you know you'd rather have that done now rather than later but if the rest of the committee is comfortable that the mailing is adequate then that should address the parking wasn't the mailing less attached yeah yeah the only you know that I think the only concern really that I have is what's identified as parking lot number one and you know Harry's prohibition bistro and dump or Dan's are probably the two businesses that use that a lot they still have the parking closest to their restaurant available and I you know even driving down there on 4th of July I mean there these lots aren't weren't even full for the 4th of July so you know I just think that I think using the back half of these lots and trying to keep it closest to the business likewise of parking lot number two anglers Avenue staff and stuff work use it and then walk around the you know units to there so I you know it's accommodating the people that really needed and I and I think from a planning perspective the the buildings are located such that they're the least impactful to the existing given the nature of where the businesses are in the businesses that generate a lot of traffic okay lots comments all right we are looking for a motion to approve moving forward and directing the staff to draft a purchase and sale after consultation with mr. Grota yes okay Cheryl entertain a motion to that effect so move move by Soxie is there a second before a second okay there's a second tray good morning tray you came out of no good morning I've been here a good morning good morning just under discussion madam chair the so the purchase price it is not coming back to the RDA once they do the market analysis or you were you're saying that's going to just be entrusted to the committee or to the charge group to negotiate that I would say let us negotiate it and we'll bring the final agreement back and if you don't agree with it we can amend it at that stage yeah it will be in the average it will be in the document that we need to approve correct okay so we will see it again before we vote on it all right any other questions okay hearing none all those in favor say aye opposed chair votes aye motion carries thank you so much and good luck on your next endeavor sir everybody I appreciate it have a wonderful day thank you okay 3.2 we did 3.2 chair will entertain a motion to go into closed session under the exemption provided in section nineteen point eight five one e of Wisconsin statutes where competitive and bargaining sessions require a closed session related to a development opportunity on the former capsule property bordered by the Sheboygan River South 10th and Indiana this is a roll call vote is there a motion so moved your son it's been it's been moved by Amy and seconded by Steve to go into closed session Steve hi hi chair votes I Trey hi thank you very much chair votes I we are in closed session and we will now close the TV and close the doors in the chamber thank you