 Let me tell you an argument about New York City, which I occasionally hear, and I know it's not true about you, but whether you think it's true at all, and it gets at these paradoxes of globalization, that in some ways New York City or maybe just Manhattan is fairly provincial, because people think and they're led to believe that the whole world comes here. In some ways that's true, but tourism and migration, but you don't actually get the whole world here at all. You get a highly processed filtered version of a bit of it from each particular region, and then people here in a way become more inward looking. They don't go as many other places. They feel everything's right here. They get into their routines, and is it possible that parts of Manhattan are evolving into this highly provincial place because of these cultural paradoxes? I think so, although New York still remains such a dynamic place because you also have great shifts in how what populations come here and how that affects the city, I think. There is that dynamism, the changing neighborhoods, so I still think in that sense it is a very vibrant city, and it's fairly unprovincial for a metropolitan city compared to even some European, I mean I'm from Austria, and Vienna it's a cosmopolitan city, but in the end of the year it is, yeah.