 The idea that I've made primary school children misogynistic, because I own a nice car, is that your argument? It's the misogyny that comes along with it. Oh, owning a nice car is misogynist. No, it's the misogyny that comes along with it. How does misogyny come along with owning a nice car? Because you have an image of financial success. I'm glad you're answering my questions now, we finally got the name. You have an image of financial success. Just answering my questions if she should. Excuse me, you have an image of financial success, but it comes along with attitudes towards women that are really problematic. My attitudes towards women is that women should be protected and provided for, and I've said that at length. In fact, I've said that over 50 times online, you never mention it. I say that my girlfriend doesn't have to work unless she wants to. I take care of her. I die to protect a woman. I've talked about how I stood up and faced a knife to protect a woman. And in return, you want authority over her in the way you have over a child or a dog. Peace be upon you brothers and sisters. It's confirmed that BBC clearly tricked Andrutayd into believing he would have a fair interview. Judging by his body language and facial expressions, he seemed bewitted by most of the questions. You could see that. However, that confusion quickly transformed into a resolute determination on the parts of Andrutayd to overcome the obvious ambush. The interview resembled a courtroom cross-examination with the BBC reporter trying to anticipate Tate's response to the numerous allegations against him. Yet, Tate swiftly adapted to the tactics employed. He played exceptionally well-made. Second, it's very difficult for me to sit here and have a very frank and honest conversation with you while we're in the territory of Romania about legal cases going on within Romania. I have to protect myself. I've agreed to do an interview with you and I want to be as honest with you as possible. But I can't incriminate myself in any way and I have to be very careful with what I talk about. There are no charges yet? Correct. There are no charges. And I've agreed to speak to you, but I have to be as honest and frank as I can while also protecting myself and following my legal counsel. So let's talk about what you've said yourself then. You have said on the website for your original website for the Hustlers University that you emotionally manipulated women to fall in love with you so that you could get them working in the sex industry for your financial gain. As I said, I have to be very careful with what I say, but let's put it this way. No women are coming out against me and accusing me of doing it. Yes, they are. No, they're not. Yes, they are. No, they're not. That's testimony from the current investigation. The current investigation which I cannot discuss, which I know intimately and you don't, I can tell you right now that the women who are in this case file, there are two American women who have been caught already admitting their mind. He absolutely nailed it there. The BBC clearly had an agenda. But before we jump into this, please like and share and also subscribe to the channel if you are new here. It seems they were determined to target this influential individual who has used his entire career to promote the empowerment of men despite the allegations against him. Nevertheless, the interview did provide a rare opportunity for everyone to gain insight into Tate's experience during his detention and his tans on his beliefs and their impact on society. I acknowledge that some of the points raised by the BBC may have been partially true considering Tate's business adventures and the instances mentioned where he aimed to make profits. However, it is egregiously unforgivable to equate astute financial moves with deliberate manipulation. What I had actually expected from the BBC interview was a more subtle exploration of the allegations against him accompanied by stronger evidence and an examination of his broader perspectives on religion, gender and relationships. It seemed the reporter was intent on delving into a case that was still under investigation. Accusing me, I'm guessing, what you're trying to say is you're accusing me and you're trying to say that I'm guilty of the things I'm accused of and I'm emotionally manipulating people. I'm saying that you have set your emotionally manipulated people here for your own financial gain. No, absolutely not. And I'm asking you about that? Absolutely not, is the answer. I look forward to the end of this trial. I look forward to clearing my name. I look forward to the BBC and the legacy media having to say not guilty and having to tell the truth. As I've said before, the only other person who's been found despite absolute, rigorous, destructive levels of investigation and prodding into my life is this imaginary Sophie by the BBC who doesn't exist. And if you were to find any single other man on earth and try and analyse his life forensically to the level they've done mine you would find genuine damaged people. I don't hurt people. It's not just... Thousands of women have come out in my defence. Thousands of women have come out in my defence and you've not mentioned that. Thousands of women have come out in my defence. Because the problem is when women accuse you of serious crimes. Okay, let's agree that thousands of women... It's not a problem that some people say you haven't done it. It's a problem that some people say you have. Thousands of women come out in my defence and as we stand right now we have an open criminal investigation. The people who are involved in the criminal investigation are saying we're not victims of anything. Andrew's fine, he's never hurt us. You're saying, no, I have the opposite to that. I have to counter that. I have someone called Sophie with no face, a fake name, who invented and she's not accusing you of anything criminal. So I don't see the whole point you're trying to make here. You say you manipulate women. They say you manipulate women. Why wouldn't people think you do? Do you think I'm manipulating you? I'm asking you about the testimony you've given on your website and the testimony you haven't given about it. You've printed something off that you found on Reddit and you're going to sit here and say that that makes me a bad person. I'm saying that you should know better as a journalist and do some proper journalism. Let's investigate the fact that thousands... I think you should answer my questions properly. I am. I already have and we should move on. Tate completely overshadowed the reporter. A more careful examination of her expression reveals her growing nefariousness, although she made an effort to maintain a composure while firing off her assertive questions. Interestingly, it's clear that she did not border watching the relevant video clips of Andrew Tate, which she used as the basis for some of our questions resulting in an evident embarrassment. However, Tate passionately expressed his concerns about the erosion of traditional values. Katin Ha of God vehemently emphasized the importance of men protecting women, not as authoritative figures, but as responsible individuals. The exchange between them was intense. And heated with Islamic perspective of family dynamics being prominently displayed by Tate. I am broken to your house and wouldn't you want your husband to protect you? There's a difference between conservative values and emotional control, coercive control. We're talking about protection now and I'm saying if someone broke into your house would you want your husband to protect you? It's not about conservative values or protection. It's what you're demanding in return for that. Well, I'll give you this. I don't know who your husband is. I don't know if you would stand up to protect you or die for you, but I'll give you this. If someone broke into this house right now it was a homicidal maniac. I would expect me and the other men in this room to stand up and face them while you and the other women in this room could protect yourselves. I would actually believe the men should go and engage the attacker. I believe that. And even though I don't know you and you've come into my house with a hostile agenda and you've come here to try and make me look bad, I genuinely am a force for good in the world. You may not understand that yet, but you will eventually. And I genuinely believe I'm acting under the instruction of God to do good things and I want to make the world a better place. I genuinely believe my legacy is a good legacy and I believe that eventually when the legacy media catches up they're going to understand I'm a good positive influence. I'm not interested in damaging the world for money because if I was interested in damaging the world for money I could have sold drugs or I could make rap music and encourage everyone to stab each other like all the drill artists do. Or you could make controversial statements online that attract a lot of followers who you then direct to your website where they pay to learn how to be like you. Sure. I could make jokes online. Who doesn't? I am a good positive influence for the world. The things I teach men are stoicism, discipline, self-respect, hard work, obeying authority, listening to your fight coach, working hard in school, making as much money as possible in your job. If you actually watch the things I say, if you actually watch my comments about women, I've done long podcasts for hours long about females talking about protecting for them, providing for them, how I believe we should be treated in a relationship. I've done all of this, but you don't watch any of it and then you come here and ask me that and answer questions I've answered at length thousands of times. Since you came out of custody, there seems to have been a lot about your charity work. Correct. On your social media. I've always done the charity work, but now I'm promoting it. There seems to be a real shift. Yeah. I wonder what's behind that? Well, I've always done the charity work. I've been doing the charity work for years. I believe that it's my legacy to leave a positive influence on the world and I've been doing charity work for over five years. Post my incarceration, my unfair, unjust incarceration, may I add. Post that, and walk through the charity work I'm doing. But this is again, once again, very interesting. I spend 25 million dollars a year feeding children. Men, male children and female children in Turkey and Syria and Iran and Iraq. I literally spend 25 million dollars a year feeding children and I'm still the worst man in the world because four years ago I made a sarcastic comment. The conclusion of this argument was intriguing. A state once again highlighted his charitable endeavors around the world underscoring the Islamic value of discrete acts of philanthropy. He indirectly conveyed to the reporter the significance of giving in his core beliefs and religious faith. To be honest, state may not be the perfect individual to be bestowed with the title of an absolute mentor for men. However, it does possess certain qualities that are worth emulating particularly as the unspoken bottle against masculinity continues to intensify with each passing day. Personally, I believe that he should reflect on some of his questionable positions and apparently work toward establishing a more admirable persona in the long run. I think this would help his business. Let's live it right there, ladies and gentlemen. Please like, share and subscribe. Until next time. Assalamu alaikum.