 Well, there's one more on the list and this fella is on the list because he's been linked with us, he's played in the Premier League, he's good statue, good footballer and it is Abdullah Dukhory at Wafford. Now, I know I'm just going to give you the plus points and then you can prove the idea all you want. Yn ymlaen i fy mod i chi yn gweithio yn ardu i am y gymrydd, felly mae'n griffledd yn ymryd eich gwneud yn y ffordd, ond mae'n 5 o 6rwydd. Rwy'n cael ei wneud o'i'r p plant, o'n rhoi'r p plant. Rydw i'n gwybod尔 yna'r delim 80 yn ddefnyddio'n gwybod. Ac nid oed yn ni oedd eich pwyfyddiad yn y llaw oes o gyllideb o os i wneud. Efallai'r golyb eich gweithiol i eich gweithio, a roedden ni'n gallu'n gweithio'r party a phon yn y net. Dwi'n arnoch i wneud dros egotau Cymru. Roedd draw lluniau ar ôl. Roedd dros egotau lluniau ar ôl yn Gweinidog. Felly, mae やrchart oarrell fel ar hyn o'r 3 oes ac er mwyn i ddweud 7 oes, mae yna yma fwy o'r 6 oes i roedden yn 4 oes. Ond roedd e'n ddweud yn ers. Rhaid i ddim ni i ystafell gyda ges boeddiad. Rhaid i ddim ni i ystafell os yn dweud y gallu wneud a fydd yn 5 oes ti. Mae gwasanaeth gyrdd yn unig gyrdd, neu yn oed yn dweud ychydig. I get it, I get it. I think if he played an arm of field, he wouldn't be able to play with goldmage probably because neither of them can do that job. If you put three in there then maybe you could, if you had one who could do the job on those, I think that would be quite a nice mix of him field. I think if you put him in with someone like Santa Maria or Sangari or even Alan maybe, I think he'd be fine. So that's their all the plus points for me. The goal thing is huge, I think, and the Premier League experience because he's somebody who, if you've got five goals from a central position in the field for everything, it would make a huge difference. He's good on the ball as well, a good runner. So they're all the positive stuff for him. Negative stuff is he's going to be 28 this season. Waff had probably won £25 million, I guess, for him. Maybe they won him off the club now and off the wage bill, who knows. I still don't think £25 million is that much of a stretch for someone with Premier League experience who's different from what we've got. Go. For example, right, if we were looking for someone to play with Gabamon, then that would probably be all four, maybe. You know, Sans the Age would probably be all four because Gabamon can sit and he moves on. The issue is right now is now Gabamon being fit. I've still got Tom Davis, because I'm going to say Gomez, I've got Gilffy Sigardsson, hopefully not all of them next season. He goes to that category, though, because he is in the defence in the field. I don't mean wrong, he can't play defence in the field, but I think that Puey is the ball when he's in the field. He's the structure of that midfield, and what we need is someone to add structures in the midfield. But shouldn't we be looking for two? No, I agree with that part of it, but the problem is I think we need two defence in the field. Not only that, because Gabamon can play box-to-box last season, if I mind, he played as a box-to-box, because Pierre Conde played defence in the field. It's really key, though, that if you play them in Gomez, we're still going to have the same structural problems. Obviously, Gabamon, I've done it wrong too, but if I go on the basis that it's probably going to be only one. I think we need two. I've got no doubts about that, but I go on the basis that it'll only be one because I don't think we're signing five players, and I think we need four positions. So, if it's one, it can't be him being the one, because he doesn't have that structure, that screen in the back four, the ball when he's in the field. We'll just look at his numbers a second, similar numbers to Tom Davies in terms of tackles, which don't go wrong. I think he's better than that, because he can't win the ball. Pressing, good, because we pressed in the sleep. So 13.3 per game. Presses in the middle third. That's his main issue. He's better as an off-ball runner into the box rather than someone in build-up. Now, if he was playing with Gomez, fine, but I think if they may feel, I think, and I actually don't think he's that great technically, he's good technically. I don't think Sangari's much worse though, which is the funny point about him. I think under pressure, to Corey, he can sometimes make the bad decisions, the wrong pass. So that's why I have that, that the issue is that he's better than that. Even if he's Sangari, not being good enough technically or whatever, we'll move on from there. I think to Corey's good player, and what you do say about us in getting in the box is really key, because we just don't have that. We haven't had that since probably Osmond or Kale, if Kale wasn't a fit for him. But yeah, the similar type of player, got near the box and scored four or five a season every season in Osmond's case. It's just that, again, this is more, the talents, yes, the fit, no. And that's, I think, like I say to people, we can have all the talents in the world. People are like, oh, we won't sign so and so, you have to fit, you have to be the right fit for Evan. And sadly, at this point in time, a box to box would feel that like to Corey of his type isn't the right fit for what we need. But he is a good player, there's no doubting about that. I think sadly for him, a move probably is coming a year and a half, too late maybe. If he moved him to Silver's Fife, he would have been a good player. A move probably is coming a year and a half, too late maybe. If he moved him to Silver's Fife a season, so Osmond, I think he was one of the three players, Mr Richard and Andrew Curio. Where's he now? We're going to come and if he got them then, great, imagine him and go on again, you know what I mean? That would have been perfect, but we didn't. And I think he's a bit, I think he'll probably get a good move somewhere, but I don't think it's right time for him in Evan any more. 1.76 progressive ones. Which is his key, because you can drive, if you watch him, there's been a couple of times where he's picked the ball, and he ended up in the box nearly. You can do that, a big powerful runner, strong, taxed the space well, knows how to put defenders on the back foot. Again though, Andrew Gomes should be that type of midfield for us. We'll see whether that happens, but I think we need someone to add. The key is cutting down on the amount of easy chances that come through midfield, because you're leaving too much pressure on your centre backs. What if we went for two though? Would that make it easier for you? If it was him in Santa Maria, then yes, because then you'd have the four, then you'd have Gabarman, who can play defensive of the field, you'd have Santa Maria, so you'd have them two, and then you'd have the two box-to-box players, and then you've all scocked Gabarman, who can play with any of them, really, because he can play both positions. Then yes, but I don't see... But not if he's a one, if it's a one then no. That's fair enough. 27 as well, you know, if you get before your deal there, he's a light starter. Don't he start by your first team football? He's doing 22-23 anyway, so he's got a lot of mileage left. No, that's fair enough. If you're talking about one position, one sign, and then no, he probably isn't. If it's going to be two and you're looking to match it up, then I think he makes sense, because he's got the experience, there's no need for him to acclimatise, he knows the game, gets up and down, can he compete? Yes, he can. He's got something we haven't got, which is goals in him, which we don't have. Makes a massive difference, I think. That's fair enough.