 Eric Schmidt of Google, every time I see him says, well, how come you guys do this and no one else does? Estonia right now is one of the biggest champions of the digital single market in Europe. And E.U. just did a study that E. Governance placed us as number one in Europe. Crucial element to making a system like ours work is the universal use of a electronic ID. A unique ID enables you to have a legal signature. All these services that require a signature or identification can then be done electronically. For example, we offer digital prescriptions and 99.9% of the population uses digital signatures. The other side of what all of this does is that it leads to far greater transparency. Our system is extremely trust-based. People believe that they are secure. This is one reason why I'm completely against any kind of back doors, even if there is a belief that there's a back door, let alone if a political leader says, oh, it's just to catch terrorists. The knowledge that someone can use a back door to access your data will say to people, this is not secure. The problem we face today in this whole field is that we're working with solutions that were devised in the late 70s, early 80s. We've not gone beyond that. Having one big server with unencrypted data is not one of those solutions. If you want to have security, you're going to have to have a different system, some kind of chip or a fingerprint. You need to have two separate things with the architecture to match them up. It makes it far more secure than the usual system that we use, which is just a name or an email address and a password. Unless we have a clear understanding of what one needs to do to have security online, we will not move ahead with e-governance.