 About two months after Republicans declared war on Joe Bynne's Orwellian power grab and just a few weeks after the so-called Disinformation governance board was paused. It has now been apparently completely scrapped. According to the Democrat post quote Department of Homeland Security Advisors urged the agency Monday to scrap the Disinformation Governance Board that the Bynne administration created this year only to watch it implode amid confusion and partisan quarreling over its role. Of course. In typical fashion, they're trying to somehow diffuse the blame and as usual transfer it to the Republicans for what they call Partisan quarreling. It's just like any time the Democrats step in it and the Republicans pointed out the media frames that as pouncing or seizing on. The truth is we're talking about a group that chose Nina Jankowitz as its leader. The two main reasons that the entire thing imploded is one because a whistleblower told us all about it and two because Nina Jankowitz burning partisan hatred for Republicans and conservatives was exposed quote a Homeland Security Advisory Council subcommittee concluded in a one sentence draft recommendation that there was quote no need for the disinformation board and the council Endors the recommendation at its meeting We'll dive right into this clip after I quickly tell you about this free coin offer from protectosecond.com Shipping and handling not included. The recent shootings, especially those in schools is bringing about stricter gun reform bills Congress has just passed the most significant gun reform bill we've seen in decades But as we all know bad guys will always have access to guns Unfortunately for law-abiding citizens the Second Amendment has never been more at risk of being infringed than this year A new site is showing their support for the Second Amendment to create change and you can get in on it, too Get your free Second Amendment coin today by going to www.supportthesecond.com That's www.supportthesecond.com Support gun owners, gun rights, and the Second Amendment Official said they created the board in April to fight disinformation fueled extremism That might endanger national security But Republicans and conservative media Portrayed it as an Orwellian tool that could infringe on privacy and free speech They are still defending this shit It was just gonna fight extremism online Again at the kernel of that criticism is the idea that this board would be policing speech Which it wasn't going to do but as I pointed out in another video Nina did quietly mention patrolling speech online to quote stop mass shooters and then I think another example that's Important that's also within the department's portfolio, especially given the events of the past few weeks Is that disinformation plays a role in radicalizing people to violence? You know, we're seeing continued mass shootings here in the United States and in many of those cases Violent extremism is begotten by things people see on the internet So that's the sort of thing that we would be looking to address That is in fact an Orwellian tool that could most definitely infringe on your privacy and free speech And of course all the people that are defining this term extremism are left-wing Democrats These are people that think it's extremist to oppose open borders or drag queen story time It doesn't take a conspiracy theorist to deduce who their targets of this Extremism would be the public section of the meeting was held via audio only officials did not Identify all members on the call or respond to questions afterward the council had a quorum and approved the recommendation in a voice vote For such a non-threatening totally not Orwellian threat to your privacy and free speech They sure are secretive and afraid of transparency They won't even answer basic questions under oath your name is on a memo with mr. Silver's dated september 13th 2021 the subject is organizing DHS efforts to counter disinformation This is the memo that recommended the establishment of the disinformation board It was turned over to me and to senator grassley by a whistleblower I have to tell you we've had the darndest time getting any information about this board out of your agency We've asked and we've asked members of this committee have asked We would know virtually nothing had it not been for this whistleblower who turned over a tranche of documents All of which are now public so since I have you here and you wrote the memo Let me just ask you a question or two about it Whose idea was it to establish this board? with respect to this internal working group there were discussions about the need to Ensure that there were guardrails in place across the department to protect civil rights and civil liberties and privacy and as such There were discussions about creating this internal working group. Well. Yeah, all of that. I noticed is is in the passive The passive voice of my my question is whose idea was it to set up the way you use the word working group But I noticed that that's not at all with the memo says it doesn't call it a working group The directive that mr. Mayorkas eventually signed off on does not make this board a working group it had managerial authority It had directive authority all of that's in these documents So let's please not go back to those tired and now disproven talking points Whose idea was it to establish the board was yours? Senator without going into internal deliberations of the Department of Homeland Security There were a series of discussions among person who I'm not going to go into the internal deliberations of the department the why not You're under oath. I am under oath sir That said these are internal deliberations at the department. It was a working group, sir Does the charter call it a working group? I don't recall the no the answer is it does not So was it your idea to establish the board as I testified senator under oath the Establishment of the working group was a decision taken a conversation that was had among multiple individuals at the department Okay, so you're not going to answer my question, but hey at least this apartment is officially gone And we're not going to have to worry about it anymore Right Right except it's not really gone It's just being taken over by the Democrat Party government's propaganda arm so-called national public radio Which only represents the far left have now announced their own disinformation board what can go wrong? Wait a minute. Let's just take a look at who's gonna be on this so-called disinformation team Shannon bond needs little introduction Shannon is currently a tech correspondent based in the Bay Area The Bay Area you say a very Democrat left-wing area It's also a favorite spot of the CCP to deploy their spies You may have heard of a couple of their targets strange how they always seem to go after Democrats in the Bay Area in any case a quick search of Shannon Bond shows she's your typical left-wing activist in the media Who promoted the disinformation that hunter-binds laptop was not a real story You know, this is really it's maybe the biggest decision that Facebook and Twitter have made so far about what content they limit on their platforms This is all about a New York post story That's based on supposed emails from hunter-biden Joe Biden's son And there's lots of questions about the story including whether these emails are real and how they were obtained by the Trump Associates who gave them to the post just a lot of rules now about trying to stamp out misinformation and these Conspiracy theories and they've noticed mistake. There are real threats on social media right now The Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee had a hearing about this today Here's what Nina Jankowitz who studies Russian disinformation told them Why isn't that leftist activist types that hate Republicans and conservatives always get put into positions like this It's obvious that these folks will only ever find disinformation coming from their political opponents It's not like this is even baseless speculation Because NPR has proven over and over again to be spreaders of disinformation for example NPR's own Managing editor straight up said they wouldn't report on the hunter-bind laptop because it's the distraction Even after the story was confirmed to be real NPR continued to lie falsely claiming quote It was discredited by US intelligence and independent investigations by news organizations once again spreading disinformation NPR painted small it as a victim up until a year later when he was convicted They wrongly characterized innocent kids as racist aggressors Ignoring all the video evidence because a few of them had MAGA hats on they spread disinformation about the Jacob Blake shooting Framing it without evidence as a racial unjustified shooting which led to riots that they then spread even more Disinformation about claiming they were peaceful of course even when they knew they were spreading disinformation about hands up don't shoot Which also led to riot they tried to rationalize it as true because it had been repeated so much These are the people who think that they can dictate to the rest of us on behalf of their party's government from a place They call public media what is and isn't factual information. All right. That's another one in the can I hope you hit that like button share this video and let us all know what you think about NPR's announcement in the comments Thanks for watching