 The problem right now in the online space, there is a lot of censorship happening. So you look at YouTube and you look at the fact of, you know, they've had many different ad Armageddon's and, you know, they're more and more geared towards the corporate side, as opposed to independent content creators. Have you ever had any of your stuff demonetized? Any time. Really? Oh, yes. Wow. Okay. I didn't think you were such a controversial person. I'm not a controversial, but it's like, it's all ML. It's not like a manual person. Any time I talk about like psychedelics or this or that. OK, great. You just demonetized this video. Yeah. You know, for me, I make fuck all from from YouTube. And like peanuts, like I can't even cover my fucking cell phone bill. But, you know, I'm luckily in a position I don't need money from YouTube, but many creators depend on the revenue from YouTube or other forms of media platforms. And it's getting more and more difficult. And you're seeing right now a suppression of free speech on all of these platforms, whether it's Twitter, whether it's YouTube, whether it's Facebook, primarily YouTube, because a lot of creators they need to add revenue. Now, YouTube is a private company and they can do whatever they want. The only thing I don't like about YouTube, it's like, if you're going to make policy, don't nitpick. It should be a flat policy. Like everybody's not like, oh, Jesse gets special treatment. Oh, why the fuck you get special treatment? No, it's for everybody. If this is the law, that's the law and the story, right? True. Carpet it, right? And I feel like this is such like a dilemma with like these platforms. It's like, OK, cool. You're telling people to go develop on you and create content and you're getting people to rely on you. Like they don't work without the content creators, right? Exactly. But now they're kind of putting these kind of like arbitrary laws on them based on some sort of, you know, whatever. There is this problem right now where there's a lot of amazing content creators around the world. Someone needs to fundamentally solve that problem. Yeah. Patreon model where people are going to donate for you. I think that's a failed model. I think the model has to be B2B. People will not pay for content. They've just been so conditioned for free. The model has to be a B2B model where I'm on this social media platform. Let's call it, you know, the new YouTube, whatever. And I'm providing content. There might be ads or might not be ads. Who knows? It might be like sponsorship products on the on below it, like an e-commerce. But there has to be a new business model for content creators. You know what I've been noticing is a lot of content creators will actually have like the in-built ads that YouTube can't censor. Like they'll talk about like my first one. Yeah, they'll talk about C-Keeks for like the first 20 seconds. C-Keeks pay us, because I just mentioned you guys, but pay up, yeah. But yeah, can't skip that. And they can't demonetize that. So, you know, but then again, that kind of, I don't know how these people like getting contact with like C-Keeks. I don't know how they like make these deals and negotiate these deals, but there could be one companies that form around that, but there could be like with multi-sigs and sort of maybe blocking economic things. You could actually kind of get some sort of businesses and dApps working around that. They're connecting content to those people and having these like maybe funds or bounties almost where people can grab them. Like, hey, mention us and have this many followers and it's kind of this transaction that happens to the third party. Like happen straight on the block. And there's enough money in that that it could work today with gas limits. You know, I think the biggest thing that the challenge that somebody creating that would have was onboarding people and convincing people like, oh, it's easy to use. No, it's not. Listen, this is an opportunity for Brave. If Brave can onboard YouTubers and match what YouTubers are making and have the Brave token automatically sent as Ether Bitcoin, Brave, if you guys are listening, this is an actual strategy for you. There's a massive disappointment of micro influencers on YouTube. People that have, let's say, 20,000, 30,000 subscribers. Diehards, they produce amazing content. And YouTube treats them as shit for the most part. This is an opportunity where if you can onboard YouTubers and show them some inanimate to share, whether it's like you have ads on their video and you know, working with your publishers on the backend, but this is an opportunity whether it's Brave or somebody, there's a golden opportunity right now for people to grab angry content creators and bring them on their platform. Yeah, absolutely. And yeah, you kind of see like, and I don't like to get into this idea of like the actual like politics and stuff, but starting to seem like every large tech company leans left of the political field. So like even centrist people who are like, or even people who are like, and by right wing, I mean like just bone sensor anything, just like it's a free open platform. Those don't seem to exist too. So that's, and it kind of is what blockchain talks about. It's like free open, no censorship because none of the big tech companies are going that direct. I don't care about private company censoring. I just don't care. One, I know there's people that will make a debate whether Facebook is a private company. Sorry, it is. It absolutely is. And I think that it's going, that the way that Mark Zuckerberg is going to try to appeal to like, oh no, come in, regulate us is just recipe for disaster. Oh yeah. And then you're going to get to the point where, well, they're not a private company anymore. They're a mix of private company and the government. And that's just so, so much worse. I just, so many bad things. They become the WeChat of North America. Yeah, yeah, that's where they're going. They at Libra, man. Yeah. And so for me, it's like, listen, they can do what they want. I just look at laws very specific. It's like, if you have your terms and services on your platform, you can't be nitpicking. You can't be cherry picking whether Jesse gets preferred treatment over me. Like if there's a rules of like, you're not allowed to do ABC, that applies for everybody. You can't be like, you just can't have special treatment, whatever they can do. You and I, before this conversation we're talking about, there's, it's not really successful to protest and break things. You may cause a little uproar at the beginning and some people may notice, but in the long grand scheme of things, you're not really making change. Change only happens when you create something superior to pre-existing, let's say, products or services. And so for me, this is maybe where like, kind of blockchain can head or crypto can head in general. It's like, that would be exciting. It only comes around with an interesting product that can supersede and in every fundamental way is better than YouTube or better than Facebook.