 Welcome to DDRC members, staff, and guests. We ask for your patience during this virtual meeting. Multiple staff members are behind the scenes to make sure that the meeting runs smoothly and all applicants and citizens are able to communicate with the commission at the appropriate times. During the meeting, you will see live images or still images of DDRC members and staff. However, images of the applicant and the public will not be visible. The public will also be able to participate via three methods. When participating, please provide your name for documentation purposes. So you can watch email, sign our log into the web session. If you're watching, you can access the city to be at www.youtube.com backslash user backslash Columbia FD government. If you're emailing, you can submit letters or statements to CSU board meeting at columbiasd.gov leading up to and or during the meeting, which will be monitoring this account. All emails or letters will be read into the record. You can participate via phone by calling 855-925-2801 and when prompted, please enter the meeting code 5651. If you're calling in, you'll receive three options on how to participate. Star one will allow you to listen. Star two will allow you to record a voicemail message that will be read into the record. Star three will allow a participant to be placed in a queue so that they may speak live when prompted. If you're calling in, please make sure your computer audio is muted so that we don't get feedback. And if you're streaming, you can do that at publicinput.com backslash cocdrc-march. So I will call the roll, Mr. Baker. And everybody, just a reminder, you may need to unmute. Mr. Baker, Mr. Broom. I'm Bill. Thank you, Mr. Broom. Mr. Dinkins. Present. Thank you. Miss Fuller-Wilt. Here. Miss Jaco. Here. Miss Johnson. Here. Mr. Salibi. Here. Mr. Savery. Here. And Mr. Wolf. Here. We have quorum. In order to avoid ex parte communications, DDRC members are under strict instructions not to discuss cases under consideration with the public or with each other outside of the public forum. The meeting typically starts with staff calling the case, giving a summary of the project, and then calling on the applicant to present if they wish. Decisions are typically made in one evening. Decisions may be appealed within 30 days to a court of competent jurisdiction. Oaths will be administered individually as we hear either from applicants or from live speakers. Applicants with requests before the DDRC are allotted a presentation time of 10 minutes. This time should include but is not limited to an overview of the project, case history, and any pertinent meetings held regarding their request. This time also includes all persons presenting information on behalf of the applicant, such as attorneys, engineers, and architects. This time limit does not include any questions asked by the DDRC or staff regarding request. Members of the general public are given the opportunity to address their concerns in intervals of two minutes. Applicants may have five minutes to respond. Staff has a timer and will make presenters aware of when their time has expired. Are there any changes to the agenda? We had one change to the agenda under the historic regular agenda, the vacant lot adjacent to 2225 Rembrandt Street, which is the request for a certificate of design approval for site improvements, appeal to a staff decision in Elmwood Park architectural conservation district and has been deferred for next month. OK, the DDRC uses the consent agenda to approve non-controversial or routine matters by a single motion in vote. If a member of the DDRC or the general public wants to discuss an item on the consent agenda, that item is removed from the agenda and considered during the meeting. The DDRC then approves the remaining consent agenda items. Will staff please read the consent agenda? Certainly. The first item is 310 Morrill Hill Lane. It's a request for design approval for new construction in the Elmwood Protection Area A. The next item is 415 Hardin Street, a request for design approval for an addition and site improvement for an individual landmark. And the final item is 1420 Woodrow Street, a request for design approval for an addition and new construction of an accessory structure and request for preliminary certification for the Bayleydale in the Melrose Heights, Oakland architectural conservation district. Thank you. Is there anyone from the DDRC that would like any item removed from the consent agenda? Is there anyone from the public that would like to have an item removed from the consent agenda? Please communicate by sending an email to cocboardmeetingatcolumbiasc.gov or communicate via phone by pressing star two to leave a voicemail or star three to speak in person. We will pause a moment to allow any communication from the public. We have no emails regarding the consent agenda. Okay. Not hearing any comments from the public or the commission. Do I have a motion and a second to accept the consent agenda and the February minutes? So moved. Second. Move for a vote. Mr. Baker. Mr. Brown. Yeah. Mr. Jenkins. Yes. Ms. Fuller-Wilkes. Yes. Ms. Jacob. Yes. Ms. Johnson. Yes. Mr. Salibi. Yes. Mr. Saveri. Yes. And Mr. Warf. Yes. The motion passes. Great. Move on to the regular agenda, please. Happy people. The first case on the regular agenda is 3452 North Main Street. This is a request for certificate of design approval for new construction in the North Main corridor overlay district. The proposal is for a new office building on the parcel of the historic stone manufacturing building. The changes to the existing building will come before the BRC at a later date for Baileyville approval as the National Register property. While the new building is being reviewed for state historic tax credits, due to its location on the same parcel as the existing historic building, the new construction is being reviewed for the North Main corridor design guidelines as it is not within a city designated historic district or classified as an individual city designated landmark property. The North Main corridor overlay requires setbacks of five foot minimum to 15 foot maximum. The National Park Service review for historic tax credits requires that the building be setback from the street much farther as to not to obscure the view of the historic building to the north. The Board of Standing Appeals granted a variance for the required setback. Staff supports the increased setback with the condition that parking not be located between the building and the sidewalk to emphasize pedestrian orientation of the building. And also as a note, this will come before the Planning Commission in April for their site plan review. So that'll be reviewed for some of the other aspects of site plan review. So overall the project does meet the design guidelines and staff recommends approval of request with details referred to staff. And the architect Josh Fisher is here from Lambert Architects to answer any questions if you guys have them. All right. Yeah. Thank you, Lucinda. Any questions or comments from DDRC commissioners? We encourage those that would like to communicate via email to begin sending in letters and emails at cocboardmeeting at or on the web at publicinput.com slash cocddrc-march. For those wanting to leave a voicemail or speak live, call 855-925-2801. And when prompted, please enter the meeting code 5651, then press star two to begin leaving the voicemail. If you would like to speak live, press star three. Please be sure that your computer audio is off to avoid feedback. We will now hear comments that had been received in writing. We have no emails regarding this project. Okay. Any voicemails received? Okay. Nothing has been received? No. We do not have any voicemails that are received. And we currently do not have anyone in the queue to speak. Does the applicant or I think the architect who is present wish to speak or providing information? Doesn't sound like we have any questions. Using one. All right. And I move to have a motion. I move to grant the request for a certificate of design approval for new construction at 3452 North Main Street with details deferred to staff. This takes into consideration the application materials that we were provided and the North Main Quarter design guidelines. Second. Second. Mr. Baker. Mr. Brown. Yeah. Mr. Dinkins. Yes. Ms. Fuller-Wilt. Yes. Ms. Jacob. Yes. Ms. Johnson. Yes. Mr. Salibi. Yes. Mr. Savry. Yes. And Mr. Walt. Yes. The motion passes. And our next item on the agenda, here we go, is a recommendation to amend section 17-674 for Columbia Code of Ordinances to amend the criteria for review of design of structures and sites. This is a proposal sponsored by Councilman Duvall. And the language for this would fall as it shows on your screen. There is an existing passage under one C of this area that reads for individual landmarks in the landmark district, each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings shall not be undertaken. The new language added onto this is in blue on your screen and reads an opening and its configuration which have gained historic significance in their own right may be replicated in an opening on the same elevation of a given structure where the existing configuration is not original maintaining the dimensions of the historic opening. And staff was recommending for approval. Thank you Amy. Is there anyone present to actually discuss this? I don't believe we have any sample people present so I will do my best to answer any questions if they arise. Okay open it up to a DDRC missioners to comment. We encourage those that would like to communicate via email to begin sending in letters and emails to cocboardmeeting at columbiasc.gov or on the web at publicinput.com slash cocddrc-march. For those wanting to leave a voicemail or speak live call 855-925-2801. When prompted please enter the meeting code 5651 then press star two to begin leaving the voicemail. If you would like to speak live press star three. Please be sure your audio is muted to avoid feedback. We don't know here any comments that have been received already. We have no emails at this moment. Okay I've gotten no voicemails or calls as well. Likewise we do not have any voicemails. We do not have anyone on the call. All right we'll turn back any follow-up from any commissioners? Not? Do we have a motion? I move to adopt the newly proposed language which would amend section 17-674d1c of the columbia code of ordinances to state the following. An opening in its configuration which has gained historic significance in their own right may be replicated in an opening on the same elevation of a given structure where the existing configuration is not original maintained the dimensions of the historic opening. I'll second that. And if staff may insert I neglected to mention to y'all that this is a recommendation from DDRC and the language will be going forward to council. They are the ones who will finally approve this so if y'all could just make this a recommendation for approval of the language that would be helpful. Does that do we need to amend how the motion was made or change the wording? I think if you can just amend to make that a recommendation for approval that's typically how we price these. On the ass I know Commissioner Johnson made the motion. Can you just make that clarification for us please? I'm sorry I was on me I apologize. Sorry sorry. Okay so I move to recommend to city council that the newly proposed language amending section 1764 do you one see of the Columbia Code of Ordinances be changed to state that an opening in its configuration which have gained historic significance in their own right may be replicated in an opening on the same elevation of a given structure where the existing configuration is not original maintained the dimensions of historic opening. I will maintain my second. Thank you. All right we're for both. Thank you. Mr Baker, Mr Brann. Yes. Mr Dinkins. Yeah. Miss Fuller-Wilk. Yes. Miss Jacob. Yes. Miss Johnson. Yes. Mr Salidi. Yes. Mr Saveri. Yes. And Mr Wolfe. Yes. Thank you. The motion passes. Great. Thank you. Do we have any other business on the agenda? There is no other business tonight. Okay. We have a motion to adjourn. It's adjourned. The world record. All right. Yeah. I thought that was fast. I'd like to make a motion to adjourn this meeting. Motion on the motion. All right. I think we are adjourned then. Thank you everybody. All right. Thank you. Thank you.