 Mr. President, I'd like to introduce Keith Flaherty, Chairman of Citizens for Aging. Hello, sir. How are you today? Excellent. Very good. Beautiful day outside. I think spring is coming. I have the fingers crossed. Why don't you move on? Sure. Well, this is a little vented from New York. Alright. I have a tie for you from the New York Stock Exchange because I wasn't there when you were there. Got a bull and a bear on it. Well, thank you very much. This is when we were from Harrison Berger. President, I want you to remember to be on my parade every day. Thank you. I'm also Chairman of the Board of Realization in California. Thank you. John Flaherty? This is the big thing. I'm not the President. I thought you. My pentatica, sir. It's nice to see you. Thank you. This is Dave Robinson from the Great Northwest. Seattle, Mr. President. Good to see you. Good to see you, sir. We bring you greetings from, you know, stay the course. Thank you for doing a marvelous job. I love you. This is Janet Buckley, who's here in Washington. Hi. Pleasure. Nice to see you. This is Father Gilmour de Plas from Long Island. Mr. President and the President of the Catholic Traditionalist Movement, which seeks for about 15 million Roman Catholics in the country, and I want you to know that my love and respect for affection for you is unchanged. You are doing God's work. God will not let you down. God bless you. He won't. God bless you, sir. Thank you, sir. This is John Burke from the Catholic Traditionalist Movement. Good to see you. God bless you. Thank you very much. I'd like to introduce my son. Mr. President, it's an honor, sir. Nice to see you. Nice to see you. Up in New England. This is Ken Balmo, the director of Citizens for Aging. Nice to see you. My wife is Nick Rock. I just want to say, keep up the good work. Thank you very much. This is Mr. Kilgo from Hawaii. Good to see you. Nice to see you. We're behind you. Good to see you. Good to see you. Good to see you. Yes, it was a gift. That's a really nice gift. It was a gift. She's great. She's going to be good for the Republican Party. Oh, no, no. Sir, this is Eddie Bourne of fellow California. Well, hi. How are you? I'm great. Thank you. My parents are in England. You said they thought and said that. Thank you very much. I understand we're supposed to be a group. Well, sir, we are a group. We have 100,000 members around the country and we're all pulling for it. We're waiting on a daily basis. Some of our best friends are in this room and we wanted to show them how deeply we appreciate their efforts. I like the title. And I am much grateful. I know what you've been doing. You've been doing recently in regard to the latest poll topic in the Congress. Seize me in Washington or CNN. I said that, too. Yes. Well, the comments from inside the built way, a lot of times don't resemble it at all with the rest of the country. Thanks for what's happening in the rest of the country. I come from the other Washington and we have a different idea than what you read in the morning paper. We're keeping you the post in the New York Times. Give you a little sense. Look at the example there. Then he did a poll among those who had not seen the news and a sizable majority of them. Very interesting. Power of incident analysis. These are just some souvenirs of their key rings. Some souvenirs from the local office here. Sure, we all have key rings. No. No. No. No. Sir, I'm going to lose this key ring. That's not key. Thank you. Thank you. You see you on television. Thank you, sir. We were planning on that. The people were looking at us. We were crying. Every time there was a hollywood affair there would be stars and so forth and they'd want a group picture. They were like kind of heads to try and get them in. They didn't understand that he was a big established star so I asked him what he said. No one ever reads the news. I always picked that one. That's very good. That was the right place to have that one. This is presentable. We can do it. Well, I think that something was just like a repetition of a bad history. Our peace terms were getting out of the other man. If the North Vietnamese after we left moved out. That army would build up the South Vietnamese. We left them our helicopters and our tanks and so forth. We would provide the ammunition and the fuel. And as soon as we were out of the Vietnamese attack, and when the president asked the Congress for the money for the ammunition to fuel the bigger profits upon the agreement. So we would go all the way to Thailand and conquer everything. And then when the battle started in Angola after we gave the 37,000 enemy soldiers in Angola and it's a common state. And here we are again. Senator Wall talked to us today at lunch. And he put it, I think, extremely well. Either you go for the big one way or you go for the resonant way. And by the time Congress woke up to that fact. And we took it on a chin yesterday but it's not over. I've been working on this issue for five years and we've been down by this many boats before. And we just have to go to work and maybe we'll get an assistant in San Denise as it's certainly interesting. Of course, the thing here is enough boats to sustain a veto. That's good. That is a veto. But it's the next boat. The next boat on 105. I refuse to believe that that's hopeless. No, I won't believe it's hopeless. I hope somewhere I'll make the Congress face up to the fact that it's either right or wrong about your way. And that's where you will come in because I've said so many times with the legislature you don't have to just feel the heat. Too shared. Too shared. Well, sir, thanks so much for your time today. I really appreciate it. Thank you so much. It's a pleasure. All the best. All right, we clean up our iron for these guys. Good morning. Good morning. But anyway, show up. Thank you. It's a good morning show. We're all straight. Before we get into business here, a friend of Nancy's, Senator Levin, I can't remember anything she did, but she sent this clipping and said, this is written by my friend, Terry Miller. I've borrowed you with it before. And his writing is, I didn't know about this, wouldn't you think somebody would mention it? It seems that somebody's here. He must have been, don't we have six months of permits or something? And he was here for his six months, so he said that the six months were high in the country. But this clipping here is what he's referring to, one of the rare water laws American residents see as the prize. As luck would have it, the biggest group of women was Irish. According to government figures, it released over the weekend, Irish applicants won pretty well over 3,100 of the 10,000 immigration slots made available in the years. And so they did it by naming their entry forms in the state department precisely at the lucky moment. A total of 1.3 million applications were to be seen. The sweep stage was offered under the Unimensional Law, designed to help people in 36 countries whose immigration of the United States has decreased since 1965. And for years, all 270,000 immigration slots available each year have been filled by people that have been unlawful. I remember three years ago there may have been such a provision in there but let me check that expression and I'll find it scary. That's the way you got it. So staying until the fall, I had I think 59 months. How many months was it? It was 51 to 52. Real sprinkle gave the numbers to me. It's not the longest. It's a longer period but he's the only one in history that has an interest. I don't know what to do. We don't keep this going. Sir, didn't he close out with a recession? He did. That's all you have to do there to be sure. I heard that you were working on some kind of an answer. Yes, we are working on that. To both letters, as a matter of fact and what I have got in your folder today is the two positions length side by side almost in chart form. Because it is it is confusing. Don't get on the on the tree business. On the tree business. Because it keeps coming up time and again. Just for a ready reference put it in your drawer someplace. We'll get an answer to the bird letter even though it might be piecemeal, a piecemeal answer to the senator of one answer. We have Senator Will Balls acknowledged it. I thought you might like to see the photographs of the silkworm. You may recall yesterday's PDT here and I look over your shoulder. Here is the location. Two sides there. Well, we think out on that island and then on the two sides possible launches. Can this admire and then move instantly? I was told this morning it could and that was why that was the reason given for the difficulty in taking it out. But I didn't think it was that mobile. I don't know. I think it is mobile. What we would go after would be the storage sites where they are. They've got stocks of them. It is operational. It also though very nicely does look as if there wouldn't be any collateral damage. That's right. We've got no idea. I've also put in your folder an update on the ecological damage. We are being responsive on the bridges and the Corps of Engineers prepared to do anything February's Cordero wishes. But this gives you a more comprehensive picture. It will require reprogramming some money as all these things do. But we want to be as supportive as possible. There are signals coming in that Mrs. Thatcher might be willing or indeed might even like.