 So let's call the meeting the Burlington Development Review Board for July 19th to order. Um, I'm a Jill Ross on the vice chair, I'll be chairing the meeting since Brad's coverage is iffy. Scott, we have our agenda in front of us. We don't have any changes to that agenda tonight. That's correct. Probably. It's not going to be a great connection on the phone. Okay. Okay. Well, I'm sorry, Brad. We can hang out and listen. Yeah. Text us, but now don't text us actually don't. So let's get started. We have our agenda. Scott, are there any additional communications that aren't posted that we should be aware of? No, everything's online. All right, we have the minutes from our last agenda, which we can approve if anyone has no changes to them. So, with that, our first agenda item is a consent agenda item. This meeting is to amend the zoning permit for the Tarant multi-purpose event center to break it down into phases and extend the construction timeline. The applicant is here. I'll put on consent before we do anything. Does any board member object to treating it as a consent item? No. Okay. We have the applicant here. I'll swear the applicant in just for the purposes of asking them a couple of questions. Lenny, do you swear to tell the whole truth under pains and penalties of perjury? I do. So have you seen the staff findings and comments for this project? Yes, I have. Okay, with them. Got any issues? I have no issues with them. They're fine. Scott, is anyone here in the audience to talk about this project? To weigh in on this application, raise your hand, please. I know it's just the applicant, AJ. So I'm fine with treating this as a consent item. It makes sense to me. It's a nice project. Look forward to it getting completed. Can I get a motion from the board? I'll make a motion, AJ, on ZP 2239597 Spear Street. I move that we approve the application adopts that finding through recommendations. All those in favor? It's five. Oh, the eyes have it. I'm voting I too. I too. So I am here. Okay. They have it. Enjoy your faith. Thank you very much. So we have a public hearing agenda item 13 Lakeview Terrace, ZP 22184. Ryan was the project manager on this. This is Mr. McGuire's proposal to. Establish a short-term rental unit at 13 Lakeview Terrace. This was before us before we denied it. We reopened it because we believe we got the parking incorrect. I don't believe Mr. McGuire with us. I don't see him. We basically made it optional for him to attend. I mean, this was staff pointing out inconsistency with prior decision. Scott, can you just walk us through that as part of the public hearing? Sure. Or Ryan, I don't know if Ryan's there. I see him. Whoever would like to walk us through with that would be great. Well, so this is another short-term rental application. One of the last you'll see with the new standards in place. It's a duplex and requires four parking spaces under the present parking standards. It has two spaces on site right now. That's a legitimate preexisting non-conformity. So this application. Involves the change in use or partial change in use to introduce two short-term rentals. One of the duplex units would be full-time short-term rental. It needs two spaces. And then the owner's unit. The owner's unit continues to serve as the owner's primary residents. But would also be used as a short-term rental for less than half a year. So at the time that it's used as a short-term rental, that actually only needs one parking space. So there's two pieces here. One is about preservation of non-conformity. And the other is about the applicability of parking standards for changes in use. So the quick and dirty overview on non-conformities is they can be retained indefinitely unless discontinued. They can be increased. They can be decreased. In this case, the short-term rental actually decreases the parking non-conformity. We go from a requirement of four spaces for the duplex. To three spaces for both units being short-term rental. So it's still a non-conformity, right? We don't have two, we don't have three spaces. We only have two, but the non-conformity decreases from a two-space deficiency to one. So going in decreasing in non-conformity is okay. The other piece of this is under article eight. And this is, this is section eight, one 15. And this talks about existing structures and changes in uses. And for a long, long time, the city's parking standards have been focused on minimum parking requirements. That's about to change. But under present standards, it's really about the minimum standards. So in cases where the change in use. Results in an increased parking demand. And that's actually in the wording of eight, one 15. And this talks about existing structures and changes in uses. And for a long, long time, it's still a non-conformity, right? So if we're converting to eight, one 15. That net increase in parking demand needs to be provided. So if the short-term rental use. Required, let's say five parking spaces. Right. The applicant would need to provide that net increase on site. The opposite is actually the case here. By converting to short-term rental, the parking requirement goes from four spaces to three. So that means that you're increasing the degree of non-conformity. Correct. Right. Degree of non-conformity decreases. And in terms of the parking standards and eight, one 15. It only talks about when you're increasing the demand. So that's really it. Those two pieces. Okay. We have any other questions for Scott. So they need, they don't have four. They need four today. They don't have four under the BNB. They need three, even though they still don't have three, it's less than the gap between four and three. Correct. Got it. So I don't know if, can you hear me, AJ? Yeah. Okay. Scott, does that mean going forward? They now have three spaces, not four. No, because he's still going to live there. Right. It's a case where the non-conformity stays unchanged for when it's duplex. And goes down. By one. When his unit is being short-term rented. Okay. Thanks. So Scott, in either case. For. For five. The non-conformity. Will be reduced or unchanged. That is correct. And, you know, for reference, I put together a list of a sampling of prior. DRB decisions. With the same stuff going on. There are more examples, but, you know, kind of like testimony volume isn't really the point here. Just pointing it out. Well, anybody in the audience here speak on this application. Raise your hand if you'd like to speak to this application. It's a quiet crowd so far. AJ. Right. Sounds good. Okay. Well, no one here to speak on it. I move that we. Close to public hearing. It's easy. The next amended, the next agenda item up tonight is. Well, that's it. Scott, we have other business. Yeah. There's one more. Yeah. Under other other business. Right. But other business is not a public hearing at this point. Correct. So we have two other other business items to deal with tonight. One is our annual organizational meeting and the other is. A request for reconsideration of Z. AP dash 22 dash two, two or three South Cove. Recuse from the two or three South Cove matter. And so I'll go on mute for that. The annual organization meeting. We should discuss whether or not we want to do it with Brad's. Connection or whether we want to push that to the next meeting. We're also missing Jeff. And somebody else. So I'm wondering if we want to, sorry. Just blanked on your name. I want to push that to the next meeting. I think we should push it to the next meeting. Okay. So. Any issues with that? So I'm so, so the annual organization meeting. We'll move to the next. What is that August? Third Scott. Second. Second. Okay. And then I'm going to step. Off on go on mute. Then you guys. Is my reception any better right now? Can you hear me? Yeah, it's okay. Okay. So I'll try to. Does it make more sense to just deliberate on the one item? And then you can exit all together. It's fine with me. When we do that. Okay. All right. I mean, I think. I think Scott explained two or three. I mean, 13 Lakeview pretty well. Certainly better than Mr. McClelland. I mean, I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. Okay. Okay. Certainly better than Mr. McGuire did. You know, they're reducing the degree of nonconformity. He's not conforming us to parking today, but technically it's less nonconforming converting into a BNB. And that was the basis for our denial. Feels like we kind of got it wrong. So. Okay. So we approve the application subject to staff's. Findings and recommendations. In ZP 22-184. That emotion. That is a motion, Scott. Okay. I'll second that motion. All those in favor. Right. Is that you? Yes. So that's six. That was you. Seconding. Brooks. Yes. Yes. Okay. Well, Hey, you're off the hook, AJ. Sweet. Try for team. Okay. So on. 203 South COVID. It's a request for reconsideration. So it's not really on the merits. It's just a question of whether we want it. The staff has asked us ready to reconsider this. That maybe we. Didn't. Consider that our role of. Reconsidering it appropriately. So that's the question that we want to reconsider it. And Brad, do we want to reconsider it tonight? Or do we want to, I know. Caitlin and I believe Jeff voted on it as well. Do we want to push it to another meeting where. Well, we're not reconsidering it. We just, it's a question is, do we want to reconsider it? We're not going to re talk about the merits and things tonight. No matter what. It's just a question of do we want to put it on a future agenda item for reconsideration. Yeah, I know I understand that, but I think that first prong. There may be people who. Heard the issue that went away. On whether you should. I'm okay keeping this short. And can we put this on the next agenda? Scott. We could. Okay. Do we need a motion for that? I think we do. It's reconsideration. Okay. This is, this is another business item. So it doesn't need to be. Is it within the timeframe of the approval of that, of that application. To reconsider it. So the reconsideration request needs to be made within 30 days. And that's been done. You guys need to decide whether or not to reconsider it. Okay. Okay. I think the second is still within that timeframe, but it's closer. Okay. So. So many big emotion. Put this on that agenda. Move. To put it on the August 2nd agenda for reconsider to reconsider reconsideration. In a second. Chase. Okay. All in favor. I'm saying I. I. Okay. So we're on the agenda. Okay. We're on the agenda. We're on the agenda. We're on the agenda. We're on the agenda. We're on the agenda. With. And that is it for tonight. That's everything. Wow. Yeah. That's. Great. Well, enjoy the sunshine, everyone. We're had enjoy vacation. Thank you. Bye everybody. All right. We'll see you later.