 Now lastly, talking about the ethical complaints not pursued. We have been talking about ethical complaints which are needed to be considered, but there are some kind of ethical complaints which cannot be pursued. Ethical committees cannot possible pursue every complaint. The most common reason that APA declined to consider the complaint are follow-ups. What can be the complaints where there is no provision in the code? There is a complaint where there is no detail of any act which is not present with APA. Probably it is a very poor decision, a questionable level of care, or something like that which is not being explained by any code. Then when an ethical committee is not the appropriate mediator, sometimes an ethics committee refuses to process complaints because it becomes clear that the committee will be unable to make any reasonable contribution to the solution. For example, when issues are related to other than ethical aspects of interprofessional political disputes, that is, the matter is of political disputes rather than ethics. In such a situation, processing it becomes unnecessary because it is important to handle it politically rather than its ethical side. Then when respondents are not the member of professional organization, professional associations are voluntary memberships, organization, and the jurisdiction of their ethical committees extends only to current members. We cannot properly launch their complaints in the committees which are not part of their professional bodies. We can handle them on some other forum. Then when complaints are against groups, agencies, corporations, or institutions, a complaint can name more than one person, but each respondent must be known to the ethics committee by name and the involvement of each in dispute must be specified. That is, if they are more than one, then what are their names? And what are the problems that are attached to them? That is, what are the unethical parts that are committed? Ethics committees are not set up to deal with an organization or a corporation. An individual says that a company has done unethical work with me. There cannot be any complaints against that company. Rather, complaints can be against people in that company. So knowing that a corporation or a company cannot be alleged, it can only be done to people. When complaints are anonymous, then these type of complaints cannot be pursued. Usually the reason for anonymity is noted and it is typically fear of retribution. As long as we get complaints without any name, it has no value or any status. When the complaints are improper, occasionally ethics committees receive complaints that based available evidence are judged fiverrously and intended to harm and harass someone rather than to protect the public. There are such complaints that are improperly written and instead of the benefit of the public, they are made only to harass people. So these types of complaints are not processed. And last but not the least, when complaints arrive beyond designated time limits because the ethics committee experts that complaint should be filed within the specified period of time after the alleged violation has been occurred or come to the complaints' attention. This means that when there is a specific incident, after that a certain time period should be complained about. Not that the complaint is being filed after 5 or 10 years, the ethics committee cannot properly study it. So as soon as the crime or unethical practice has been committed or it comes to the information of the complaint, it is very important to process it at the same time rather than that after many weeks and many months or years that matter should be produced in front of the ethics committee. So these are the 7 ways in which the complaints which are being launched to the ethics committees are not pursued because they do not fall into the boundaries of APA code of ethics.