 guided in this by Leon Kass, who might consider one of the most evil people around, is that aging is not a disease. Therefore, artificial drugs and clinical trials in that area are absolutely prohibited. Yeah, I mean, I agree with you. And that's absolutely the case. The FDA won't allow for pharmaceuticals that actually promote life extension or fight, quote, aging. Because of everything you said, because of Leon Kass and the biotech commission that was deployed in the 2000s and the Bush, they document where they explain why they're generally against anti-aging medication or anti-aging treatment is one of the most evil documents ever written. But yes, this is the world we live in. So what they have to do is they have to do natural code supplements. It's very difficult to create formulas that gain them very rigorous IP. As a consequence, the upside for profit is limited. And as a consequence, there's a lot fewer clinical trials. So not only don't we get the so-called artificial, but we also get a lot less research, a lot less clinical trials. So we know a lot less about these compounds and we know a lot less about the efficacy and to a large extent our doctors as good as they might be. A lot of it is guesswork. They don't really know with regard to aging. And it's a difficult topic anyway, because it's hard to do clinical trials for aging. But there's a lot of conflicting information. But yeah, my approach is take the things that seem the most likely, take them one at a time. Now I've learned so that I know which one I'm allergic to and which one I'm not, which one I tolerate, which one I'm not, and keep playing around with them until I find a combination that's okay. And then I will never know if they actually extended my life or didn't, because who knows how long I'd live without them and how long I'd live with them. So that's your private head, but you're also the chairman of the Inrend Institute. Why isn't this a major political issue for the Inrend Institute? I consider it at least as important as abortion. And I've seen a lot of articles and videos on abortion. And so far, not a single one on freedom to do the clinical work with life extension and modify the molecules, make them more acceptable and so on. I mean, I think in terms of the Institute, it's a question of choosing the topics to be discussed. We don't do a lot of political topics. One of the reasons abortion is a big deal is because fine render was a big deal. And there are big cases. I think if Leon Casper is writing today and wrote that piece and published that piece today, I think the Inrend Institute would come out with a rebuttal on that and go after. Certainly I would on the show. I would take that piece, take it to pieces. I think the Institute picks and chooses where it can make a big difference. But I take your point. I mean, this is a good issue. It might be an issue that could attract a lot of people, Silicon Valley types, kind of the billionaires who invest a lot in life extension, but there's no specific reason. And part of it is the interest of the intellectuals at the Institute. They write on what they're interested in. Yes, but the Leon Cas memorandum is still in force and because it is still in force. Nobody knows about it. So a big part of why you write. Many people don't know about it. No, but one of the big reasons why you write is to gain attention, not to convince. So you're not going to gain attention by digging up a document for 2005. Nobody cares. But you are going to get attention about a Supreme Court decision tomorrow. If the Supreme Court took up a case relating to this issue, we would definitely comment on it. You'd get a lot of attention on it. So the way you pick topics is not because you think that on any issue, you're going to convince anybody. Indeed, I don't know if we convince anybody in abortion, but you pick a topic with the idea of, you know, in a sense getting press, getting attention and getting people because of that to read Ayn Rand. And if we thought we could get that with this issue, and I think maybe we can, I think given a generation now of, you know, billionaires investing in this, maybe this would be something that they would pay attention to. I'll bring it up. It's a good point. That was my first. Thank you for listening or watching The Iran Book Show. If you'd like to support the show, we make it as easy as possible for you to trade with me. You get value from listening. You get value from watching. Show your appreciation. You can do that by going to iranbrookshow.com slash support by going to Patreon, subscribe star locals, and just making an appropriate contribution on any one of those, any one of those channels. Also, if you'd like to see The Iran Book Show grow, please consider sharing our content. And of course, subscribe. Press that little bell button right down there on YouTube so that you get an announcement when we go live. And for those of you who are already subscribers and those of you who are already supporters of the show, thank you. I very much appreciate it.