 Okay, so we have about 10 minutes for questions. And do we have any on Twitter? Okay, you can go first. And please let me know which of the panel members you'd like to answer the question. First, the first question, I don't know who can reply on it, maybe one of the audience. I can't decide who can reply to me. First question is we are talking about innovation. When we are talking about innovation, we need a home for innovation. Who can make this rule? Who can make a container for all ideas that every person have? I am talking about that maybe everyone in Qatar in this region, maybe in more than this region, have a small idea. And this is a small idea, he don't know how to communicate this idea to others, okay? By communicating his idea with another ideas for other persons, they make developing for a specific idea. These old ideas should be contained in specific containers. This container should have funds, should have services provided. A lot of services needed for this innovation and containing all of these ideas, okay? Let me, I'm describing that because I was working on open source applications. Sometimes I want to make an open source product and make it for public, for public, for all. But actually I was afraid that someone stole my idea and make it commercial and get money from it, okay? I don't know what is the correct way that I am going in, okay? To have my rights of my ideas, okay? And have respect from all others that this is my idea. Okay, I will not going to share my idea if I don't get benefit from it. So I'm gonna ask Habib to respond first and then Dr. Shaker to respond second. Habib from the perspective of the entrepreneur and Dr. Shaker from the perspective of how do you encourage this insight accompanying? Yeah, so you're talking about ideas. Ideas are used to something, it's all about execution. So if I were here, I would not worry about someone stealing my idea or someone trying to work something against me. I would be open, maybe not open with all the world, but open with enough people that can help you get that to the next level. You're talking about how can you get it incubated and contained and I think this goes against everything that we talk about innovation, about openness. I think what you should think about is try to, if you really want to do that, I have an idea I want to take to the next level, do it. Do your thing, get a prototype ready, it's so cheap. I think all the goal of this conference is to say that today the cost of innovating is cheap and you don't have to look for funds to begin with, do something, you don't have to look for support or government support, that's all about you. It's all in your hand, you can do it and then when you get to the next level, it's when you go and seek an institution of support. Dr. Shay. Yes, I mean, I understand from where you're concerned, I mean, are coming. Basically, currently we don't have the right infrastructure to cultivate innovation and part of it because we don't have mature IP rules and I thought this is the purpose of, I mean, the outcome of this gathering might, I mean, lead us into the next step and I think ICT Qatar are having a brilliant incubation program through which you and others can develop their ideas through them and I hope that in the future we can do something in this regard also. Thank you. Do you have another question, please. Hello. I have a question for Habib. You mentioned a lot about Yamli but you didn't really talk about what Yalla startup is and I was just curious to know. Yeah, so Yalla startup is from the word is come Yalla startup, which actually tells it's a message for entrepreneurs to say, you know, get off your ass on startup and just do it. And I think the idea came to me about a year ago which is not really a brilliant idea but basically I found a gap. I think there's a disconnect, a disconnect between the entrepreneurs having the idea to taking it or actually doing it to getting to the angel investors. And I think what we try to focus on in Yalla startup are three main things. A, the social stigma. You know, it's the family and friends support. We don't find that very often in the Middle East in terms of you wanting to go and leave and become your own entrepreneur. There's a great saying that says behind every great man, there's a great woman. In the Middle East I say there's behind every great Arab entrepreneur, there's a great mom who thinks her son or daughter is crazy to leave his job to go be an entrepreneur. So that summarizes kind of the social stigma. So we work on that. We also work on helping entrepreneurs to form their ideas and use the right tools like open source and creative comments and all of those so that to basically get to the next level. And for example in Beirut we're doing something in November 12th to 14th called startup weekend where we're getting people from all over the Arab world to go there, developers and designers and enthusiasts to go there from long weekend. On Friday they come in, they come up with an idea, team up and deliver on Sunday. It's a very excited program just in the one weekend but this is the kind of stuff that we try to do in Yalla startup basically the down and dirty approach of helping the entrepreneur from point, from idea to basically a variety. Do we have more questions? Just talk into it and we'll get going. Hello. I actually do have a question when it comes to innovation and when it comes to censorship actually. I've been out from QTL to answer that or anyone can actually talk about that a little bit. If we do want to innovate, if we do want to actually think about it, if we do want to create it and if we do want to be open, how can we open when there is censorship and when there's actually filters on data? So for the people that are listening on the web, the question is that if there are filters on the information that's available and censorship on the information that's available becomes difficult to innovate if you can't access the fundamental information for innovation. So Dr. Shaka please. Yeah, I mean for open innovation, I mean information should be available and should be accessible whenever is needed. But I'm not sure about what type of information is censored. If it has to do with, I mean something ethical or I mean, this is not within the context, but when we talk about information, that information that helps to cultivate and foster innovation and collaborative thinking. And just from the perspective of open access, the idea of open access is to create a sense of information, but typically the solution is to create filters. And so the question is whether those filters themselves are open and understandable. But I mean I don't know if that sits in the context of this panel as much as it sits perhaps in the government information panel that's coming next. So you may want to revisit that question in the next panel. Do you have more questions? We've got one there in the back. And we'll take this one as the last question. Hello. I have a question for Mr. Lucio. There was a mention that our ability to generate data more than the ability to store it as of now. Is there a possibility that we might overwrite our existing data and then what happens to the companies which are the storage companies that say your data will be stored with us forever and ever? What happens then if it all be run out of the ability to store data? Do we overwrite the existing data in that case? Well, you know, we were talking about the capability to do things from technology standpoint. From legal standpoint, it is completely different which we are not involving on it, you know. And as other people said before, you know, one thing is the technology and the technology is there. Unfortunately, you know, all the regulation and things comes later. You know, when we talk about the progress, the progress is very much made several times by people that do things and then the regulations comes after, you know. There is always a way to protect your data, to make sure that your data are yours, no matter where they are stored and the way you store it. As the example I gave before on the services, we are going to provide to a new European company the data will be stored in Qatar and the server will be in Qatar. They will act on the applications that are here as a software as a service, but they don't care because that's the way all the system is designed. I don't know if this answers your question. So I'm just going to, you know, give a couple of comments to wrap up and then we'll thank the panel and we can all go have lunch. But the first thing that sort of came out that I heard was, and we've heard this all day is really that open systems are almost unreasonably effective when compared to closed systems if you've given enough time and enough people. And so we've heard about that in software and I think that's what Hasham was talking about in terms of Red Hat is that given enough time, even these open systems can out-compete the closed systems and that was the case in the internet and that was the case in the web. Even if these systems start out as small as something like Linux or as small as something like the first web page or the earliest internet servers. A second thing I heard from actually three of the panelists was the importance of education. So it's important to think about education to put these same open systems into place in the education context. As you train people to be open, do that training itself in an open way. It's one of the reasons why we work open educational resources so much at Creative Commons is that we have to actually have open educational systems if we're going to have these sorts of open innovation systems emerge. And then the third and the point that I sort of wanted to leave on is Habib's idea that innovation is a human right. And so if we believe that innovation is a human right, there's only a few places we can start. It's very difficult for me to point at Habib and tell him to innovate. If we could do it, that's what all governments would do. But one of the things we can do is invest in the capacity of that individual to innovate. Because if enough people have the capacity to innovate and enough people have the opportunity to try to innovate, again, over time that open system is going to be unreasonably effective. And we can start by doing that by being open. We can start by using infrastructure like Creative Commons and like Mozilla to be a part of that. So with that, I'm going to stop. Turn it over to Brian and thanks again to our panel.