 Kaj, kako so v tudi nekaj način, kako je v barbistih, in je vsega v rodu, in nivak je v tudi v rodu. Actually, I have collected a very nice range of beautiful bird visualisation from the bronzage of the carpacing based material to show you how diverse this visualisation can be. Here, I will work with the potaryfoite. As you can see, they also have a high diversity, different kinds of birds. And, what the Zoro law, zoro archaeological investigation proves, that the bronze age list, ga sil現jeneuary za vsoče, počebenje dvoje, najbolj v conflicta dva poče, svoje dobroj, tudi neč si na svoje strane, zelo da je niso poče sprunovati na tvojo zelo. Tako zelo ki se s vahti zelo, neč je izvizualizacija iz boj, čas je okazala. Zelo da je zelo izaperil, nekaj prav, da čljamo z panjih izrečovih, kiquisite vakrošenje, aspečnosti in naredrišenej vseg tukaj. Odnočolem, da ne splugalte tukaj, še nekaj zelo všeko, nič nekaj tereske sp Cezič, da priča počkama prejacti had a konekšnja, nekaj skaj, ali, najbolj, z vodem, ali, nekaj, z vodem. In smo zelo, da vzelo, da vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, da vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzelo, vzvešali nekaj nekaj malih, pomočenju, zato je prišlo tudi na vsej, zato je na vsej izgleda v nekaj ještji, na neko vsej, na srečenju nalogu, in se za tudi na tudi. Zelo je, da tudi najhto se v zelo, kaj je je iz redu, nekaj je iz redu, kaj je iz izredne na vsej, nal Sametari, in se je nekaj... Ne kajte nekaj regularišac, nekaj vrčic, nekaj je zelo izvečanje vsepljavnih veček in semetarije. Brze bi so vse zelo zanimil, da je našli, da je odrečil, da ima delovom den, da tudi pogledati o zelo, z napradneh nama, pa se pravili, da počelnih ne bo. To ne bo dojerneh. To bo dojerneh ne se pravili in da je več-več poček vstah naprej. Daj smo gledati gdje za bo ?! But ne shouldn't forget that the Bronze Age lasted more than 1,100 years. Zato je bilo, da je zelo, da je tudi oči vrti. To se však je več veči artefakčne. Zelo sem tudi pravim semitori, ker je tudi vrti poslutni artefakčni. 50 gravs in 1 vrti. 50 gravs in pri vadi od 1 grav. Vseh je tudi treba retov z vrštih, ali je tudi jedno z vrštih. In tudi 50, tudi jedno. Tudi, najpozornej, vrštih, je Dunapentala, ki je vrštih, in tudi je tudi jedno z vrštih, ki se možemo vzveč. Nisem, je to vrštih, Zato ne bi se tomu počusti, da je to jedno, zelo jedno države, ali, da je počusti s tenem države, ne ješte njavno, da je tko v zelo ještje. Sreč sem, da vsi države sezbojilo, sezbojilo, skorito, od stvarj, ne možete počusti, imamo zelo, da se počusti, sezboj, očiljnega je nekaj lepov, ki zelo v počke. Tako proste in nekaj vičnja postavljamo. Jeste tukaj nekaj, ki v počke, ki are pendečne, pa nekaj nekaj pa vseh, nekaj je v počke. So nekaj zelo se počke, nekaj je vseh, nekaj je vseh, nekaj je vseh, nekaj je stajen, kaj je vseh. In zelo, kako smo pričeli etnograficje materije, ker, nekaj prehistorije ne zelo, zelo, da počekaj, nekaj analoži s etnograficjimi rekorcij, smo zelo, da nekaj nekaj prišli, zelo, da nekaj prišli na zelo, na zelo, na zelo, na zelo, nekaj nekaj prišli, nekaj prišli na zelo, and not with the sky, as generally said. And if we compare the organic material we find in the settlements and in the cemeteries, we find something similar and it means that the birds were more valuable from cultural point of view than as mid provisions. So that was the basic information which I could collect from the investigation of birds artifacts because we have anthropomorphized birds, but very few, so that's why I needed widening the study. If we try to study the bird-human relationship in visualization in the ceramic object, we have these four categories that bird with human feet or legs and human with bird face or bird mask, as it is supposed in many times, or bird with human face and bird body with female breast. Then I show you some nice artifacts from this categorization. Birds with human feet takes the majority of these anthropomorphized birds in the archaeological material and there are many retors among them. And these retors, I don't think that they are toys because they are often mentioned or they are often assumed that they might be toys for children, but they are fragile and you can understand if the small children who likes playing with the rattle, they don't, they break the neck and the head of this bird very easily. So they are not men. And many of them which you can see in these slides comes from sanitary. So actually they are meant for the dead person and certainly not to their children. When we see these birds depictions or these birds vessels, there is the question, are these real birds can ornithologist define the species of these birds, it's possible at all or not? So certainly I try to ask colleagues to try to find out which species they might be, but they don't like giving direct answers, but generally it's familiar for us, I think. But they generally like to say that they are water birds, they look like water birds, but I think so I took the time and tried to find in the Carpathian Basin or Nethological List or catalog to find which is the best similar to them. And actually I found that it is not a waterfall, but rather the bastard. The bastard is a big bird in the Carpathian Basin, now it is on the rarity list, but still it's quite a big body, but it doesn't like flying at all because of it has big body, but like running and moving on the ground first of all. The other question, what comes studying these birds with human legs, because you may see that first I saw that these are not human legs, because just for the stability of these small figurines, that's why the pottery made this way. But then I noticed that these legs has fingers, and certainly these fingers are not like the bird feet, but like the human fingers. So many of them, if you have a closer look at them, many of them are really human fingers, so these legs are really human legs. And if these are human legs, what might have been the purpose to give human legs birds anyhow. So maybe the makers just wanted to express that these birds are equal beings with the humans, and maybe they might something common with the notion of animism. So they were ritually animated, or how to express it. So I don't like going to the anthropological field as an archaeologist, because I am an archaeologist, but I think this is the second possibility, which we can say that it was intentionally, they intentionally made human legs to express their human sense of these birds as well. I work with the Bronze Age, but now I show you some beautiful archaeological finds from the earlier period to show that this, what I was talking about, or the anthropomorphic features are not the privilege of the Bronze Age, in the Carpathian Bison. This is a famous artefact, which was found in a grave, and it is believed to have burned body and human legs, which cannot be seen quite well in this photo, but you must believe me that it is a human. They are, it has human legs. And it comes from a very early period, because it is from the 5th millennium BC of the Carpathian Bison. The second categorization from this point of view is that humans with bird face or bird mask, this, we have very, very few, hardly any, this type of artefacts in the Carpathian Bison, but I am proud to put the Dupiaia cart with these famous birds and the famous figurines into the Carpathian Bison, because actually it is in the Carpathian Bison. And this bird face or bird mask raised a question, and they might have represented a shamanistic type of beliefs or not. Unfortunately, there are very strong critiques against interpreting these as bird face, because these who are against them believe that it is the reason that the nose is a prominent feature of the face, and it is just only overemphasized. It might be true, certainly, but if we have a look at some representation, for example, in the same period of the Bronze Age, these are the famous Shiva stones, where you can see human beings and something which also looks like human, but still they have very different heads. So it means that these heads look like and quite often interpreted as bird woman or bird man, because there are human beings here and you can see that they are different. And if you want to... I just put two pictures of a bird mask or bird feature having on the head in the picture, in the slides to show that it might have been something similar if they were really bird. However, if we go back to the earlier times, you know these famous Lascaux paintings, I just show you because it is also strongly criticized and certainly I don't want to talk about it just to show, and maybe it is really just overemphasized, but the earlier time in the Neolithic period, for example, from the Vinča culture, so here there are such small figurines or representations, the so-called bird lady or lady bird, which I don't think that's the overemphasizing of the nose of a human face. So they really seem to be real bird or duck face or duck, yes, duck head and not just a simple represent, a simple producing of human head or human face. And we have a very unique object in the Capacian basin, birds with human face, a bird actually with human face, an escoi, which actually is an escoi, but with a bird body, but human face. And the escoi are well known for the Zauzistan European archaeologists because there are tremendous escoi everywhere, but we have no other analogy, analogy with human face. And also the purpose of the escoi or the use of escoi in settlements or cemeteries, because we find them in settlements and we find them in cemeteries as well. So we know, we just believe that they are really ritual vessels. Unfortunately, we have only single example when they found something in the escoi and investigated it and they found that it might have been animal blood. So it comes from a grave. I tried to find out the original purpose of the escoi, I mean as a ritual vessel, but actually the origin is, I don't think that it can be said exactly which area was its original place. I think the whole Zauz east Europe full of escos and from the early beginnings as well. There are opinions that the escos was found in or invented in the Kikladiq, but we have much other pieces from other sites of Zauzistan Europe. And maybe the early finds which figure the body of the vessels seems to be similar to a bird vessel. Maybe it actually doesn't represent or doesn't depict the bird, but another type of escoi, which actually was made from the stomach of an animal, I don't know the English, the correct English word, which also have similar, the line of the body is similar to a line of a bird. That's why when it is not, the details are not so many on it, you cannot make a difference between them. So in the earlier type, this type of escoi, I don't think that you can say that if they are bird or not or the other type. And these are also comes from the very early period, the protossesqlo, which is 7000 before Christ. So it is quite early. This map, I show this map because I just want to emphasize that these triangles, the black triangle shows the spread of the escoi and you can see that the escoi cannot be found in the other part of Northern Europe, to Northern part, to further north from the Carpathian Basin. So maybe the Carpathian Basin is the last territory where the escoi was spread. Generally, the archaeologists say that the escoi has an eastern or southern origin, that's why they have a certain connection with the God idea, anthropomorphic God idea. But also at the same time as we have, and sorry, I just go back to the retors and other bird vessels, which are very diverse, but there are many of them. You can see them, you can find them in the Northern part, further north from the Carpathian Basin. So we believe that there might have been two main beliefs alongside with each other in the Carpathian Basin during the Bronze Age. That's maybe a little bit animistic when they use the birds as when they consider the birds as equal with human. And the idol might have been similar to the God imagination. And now here are the famous escos with human face. We have similar human face from the Troja about a bit earlier times, so it shows, we know that there might have been good communication between them. And there are two beautiful examples from the earlier period. Early Neolithic, which is the same with bird face, with the human face, a bird body with human face quite early. Another one with the Neolithic bird body with human face as well. And we have a very unique one, which has no face, but has female genitalia. So we have two breasts. So whether it might mean that these escos represented female beings, or it is just by chance, or not by chance, but it is just a single or few expression that it might have been male and female as well. Unfortunately, there are no analogies for them. And my conclusion can be after investigating the stereomorph or anthropomorphic birds that it's very difficult to offer any general ideas about them, because there are too few of them. And they might have participated also in shamanistic beliefs, because the escos also assumed to contain such hallucinic liquid, which helped the shaman or the person to their vision quest or vision travel. And they might represent two belief systems, the escoy and other bird shapes, bird with human legs. And also they might have participated in such rituals, which has a connection with some transition. So that's why maybe in the burials or in the funeral rituals, they played such important role, these birds with human legs or these one. And if these are animated beings, which have the shaman or just it was believed for the people who believed that the whole world around them were equal with humans, we don't know exactly. Thank you for your attention.