 What is the optimal exercise timing for weight loss? Is it better to exercise in the morning or the evening, before breakfast or after breakfast? There was a Nobel Prize-winning exercise physiologist who said he always ran a mile every morning before breakfast. Was he right? Let's find out. More than a dozen experiments have been published comparing the amount of fat burned in a fasted versus fed state, and every single one found more fat was burned on an empty stomach. On average, a single bout of low to moderate intensity activity before a meal burned off 3 grams more fat than the same amount of exercise after a meal. That's about three quarters of a pad of butters worth of fat, enough to improve insulin sensitivity. Same amount of exercise, but more fat loss all because of timing. Just because you burn more fat while you're exercising doesn't necessarily mean you end up with less fat at the end of the day. Maybe your body offsets the extra fat loss that occurs during exercise with a little extra fat storage when you finally do eat, balancing it out. Researchers in Japan set out to investigate the possibility that your body makes up for it later by measuring 24-hour fat balance after 100 minutes of running, either before breakfast or after lunch. In the exercise after lunch day, they burned a total of 608 calories of fat over the course of that day. In contrast, in the exercise before breakfast days, in the same 24-hour period, they burned through nearly 90% more, 1,142 calories of straight fat. So the next day they woke up with about a quarter cup of fat less after the same amount of exercise. That's remarkable. What about just something like walking 60 minutes before breakfast, after lunch, or after dinner? Over the 24 hours they exercised in the evening, 432 calories were burned off. On the afternoon exercise day, they burned out 446 calories of fat. They also had a control day with no exercise at all, and on that day they burned through 456 fat calories. That's disappointing. It's like they never walked at all, but the same amount of exercise before breakfast resulted in 717 calories of fat loss over the course of the day. Timing matters so much so that when it comes to an hour of walking, exercise increases 24-hour fat burning only when it's performed before breakfast. Here's the fat balance graph with no exercise. You can see the fat storage bump up at breakfast, lunch, and supper before slowly coming back down overnight. Exercise in the afternoon or evening and end up with more fat than not exercising at all, but exercise in the morning, and at least your fat balance comes back to baseline. All such similar studies on both men and women show we burn through more fat on the days we exercised before rather than after eating. After reading the chronobiology chapter though, or watching my chronobiology videos, an alternative explanation may spring to mind. Maybe it's just a morning thing. Maybe it has nothing to do with meals and your circadian rhythm is just dictating the difference. No, exercising in the morning after breakfast appears no better than exercising in the evening after dinner. And exercising before breakfast works better than immediately after breakfast, both still in the morning. It really does seem to be a pre versus post-meal effect, but why carbohydrate is the preferred fuel of the body when you eat sugars or starches that get broken down and converted into blood sugar? After a meal, blood sugars rise and your muscles are quick to snatch it up for fuel without having to rely much on your energy stores. If you instead take a siesta and your muscles have no immediate need for energy, the excess blood sugar from a meal can be stored in our muscles in the form of glycogen for later use. Glycogen is just a bunch of blood sugar molecules strung together into a mass of branches that can be broken off and used for quick bursts of energy anytime we need them. If you exercise after a meal, your muscles can siphon off some of the extra blood sugar floating around for energy. Before a meal, your muscles have to instead resort to dipping into your energy stores and end up burning mostly a combination of glycogen and fat. That explains why you burn more fat during fasted exercise, but what about all the extra fat burns throughout the rest of the day? Glycogen is more than a store. Glycogen isn't just an energy reserve but acts as a sensor capable of activating metabolic pathways. Exercising before breakfast can exhaust as much as 18% of your glycogen stores and that depletion can act as a powerful rallying cry to your fatty tissues to start pulling more of their own weight by breaking down more fat. The lower glycogen stores fall the greater the sustained 24-hour fat loss. How long do you have to go without food in order to trigger this effect? Six hours may be sufficient, so it doesn't have to be before breakfast. If you timed it right, you could exercise before a late lunch or if you had an early enough lunch, maybe before dinner when you get home from work. If exercising a fasted state isn't possible, does it matter what you eat? Insulin release after a meal appears to play a critical role in suppressing fat breakdown, explaining why lower glycemic foods, in this case muesli versus corn flakes, can have less of an effect. Lentils were identified as a promising option for maintaining athletic endurance, which can take a hit on an empty stomach, while maintaining more of the fat dissolution. Lentils are said to be unlikely to be consumed by the general population due to quote-unquote low palatability. They obviously haven't tried my mom's lentil soup. It's worth mentioning that although there's increased 24-hour fat burning, exercising in a fasted state, the only way to see if this facilitates weight loss over time is to put it to the test, which we'll explore next.