 concept of democracy the most were style and prolific political sociologist of the past century Martin Lipset he worked on a important issues regarding and specifically of the class structure the social mobility the party system and voters behavior and public confidence in the institutions and the social origins of socialism fascism extremism and how and why the protest takes place in the society so there is a long list of topics on which Lipset has feared his perspectives his point of views it through his writings because he was a deep believer in the importance of comparative research and he produced a variety of work by comparing various countries and specifically Canada and US and explaining that why a US never had a major socialist party or movement although a very interesting question for the students of political sociology and he considered himself a student of democracy and it is revealing that he chooses his topic in specifically in during his time when he was the candidate of the American sociological association and then he actually focused on writing on the various dimensions of democracy and the debate on democracy so Lipset's contributions to the study of democracy that that is actually remarkable and everyone actually praise him for his contributions and specifically his title his article some social requisites of democracy he is like your article which may be considered that that was the most started article or just keep an eye out for people who are going to come back as clear or democracy key various two dimensions and we explore Karna shuru kia democracy key debate for revive kia yes are a cassara credit to have a lip set ko jata hain ke unho ne isko boh zyada important topic ke tor par jo hain wo dobarah se iski importance ko jagar jo hain wo kia hain past or per lip set in this dimension per focus kia that was the social conditions of a democratic political order tunge in se pehle democracy ko as form of government democracy ke features uski khas usyad par baat ki jati thi lekin lipset ne jis dimension ko mainly highlight kia wo dimension kia thi that the social conditions of a democratic political order ke jab tak moisture ki under e khas tarha ka environment nahi hoga to apik democratic political order established nahi kar sakte aur in ke boh zyada articles aur unki kitabu ki under khas tor par iske baare main iski various jo dimensions thi unke upar likha bhiya aur khas tor par jo sustaining democracy thi that how democracy can sustained in a society agar waha ke logon ke under economic development nahi hoga yani agar maoshi taraki nahi hoga ki to hi kise mumkin hai kise mulkon ke under democratic system jo hain wo sustain kar jai iska matla ba lip set kaya perspective tha ki economic development and democracy has a deep link agar chis par boh sak criticism hoa boh sari halko ne is par debate bhi ki ke kya jo gareeb log hain wo democratic nahi hoga sakte hiya gareeb mulk intazaar karein ke jab tak unke haa maoshi taraki nahi hoga to wo democratic system ko established nahi kar sakte any boh sari pehas boh sari itarazat to hain wo in par kya garee, lekin ek aisi bahes ka agas lip set reintroduce kar hain jis ka maini hi tha ki siyasi nizamo ko is baat par fokus kar na chahiye ke wo apne logon ki maoshi taraki ke liye bakaida plan kare. agar maoshi taraki mumkin hoga to ek aisa social environment kriate hoga aisi social basis janam lein ki jinn ke baat hiya democracy jo hain wo mazboot se mazboot tar hoti chali jahi ghi. agar nahi kya hoga ki jo state hai uska jo role hai wo limited hota chala jahi gha aur khas tar par jo civil society hai wo boh sari aise questions raise karegi because poor countries jo economically rich nahi hain wo mulch jo maoshi lehaas te behtar surthe haal mein nahi hain definitely unke hain wo hot sari aise masail hoti hain jinn mein stability ka question bhi aajata hain kyunke jo democracy hain uske liye sbse buneaati shah kya hain. democracy ki consolidation ke liye according to lipset legitimacy is the much needed requirement aur legitimacy kab aegi hain kyaise aasakti hain agar log sahi karee kese asulon ki pass tari karee. log authority ko accept karee aur authority ki acceptance ke liye kya chahi zaroori hain ki khbud authority ki taraf se lovo ko ke liye aisa environment kireet ho jaha wo economically, socially, politically ek stable life jo hain wo wuzar sakin. so stability and democracy ka jo relationship hain aur kis tari ke se jo legitimacy hain wo democracy ke liye ek proper democratic norms kireet kar sakti hain yeh sab ka sab lipset ka khas khususi topic bhi raha aur uske andar jo khas topic jis par unho ni jis ke saath relate kya jis area ke saath that was the role of leadership ki agar leadership ka role positive ho gha. agar leadership ki desire yeh ho ghi ki mole ke andar legitimacy ke true system ko run kya jaye aur legitimacy kese aayi ghi when the system made liver to the majority of the people on the equal basis to ish ka matlab hai equality bhi aag hai equal opportunities bhi aag hai aur logon ke liye aisa environment kireet ho gya where they can perform not only their duties but they will gain in return. ki seh raha yeh nahi hai ki log apna kaam karenge balki in return unko uske boh saare benefits bhi milenge aur jah wo benefits milenge to phir kya ho gha system ke andar ek majority aayi ghi aur yeh lipset ki philosophy hain ke jo democracy hain wuz seh fe concept nahi hai democracy is a mechanism aur mechanism ki kuch requirements hain to jab tak un requirements ko poora nahi ki aaj aayega jab tak mechanism ko poly operative nahi bata aayega to tab tak nahi to democracy kahin par aasakti hain aur nahi kahin par democratic norms kireet ho sakti hain yeh hi bhaja hai ke lipset ne apni dehreroon ki andar in a very explicit manner he defined democracy, he defined the role of democracy and the criteria's which are much needed for a sustainable and for a mature democratic system. to hum yeh kaisakte hain ke lipset seh pehle bhi bohot saare aise political philosophers the jino ne democracy ke concept ko highlight kiya uske upar debate ki democracy ki characteristics ko highlight kya lakin lipset ne jis tari ke se social environment economic environment economic facilitation role of leadership and specifically role of legitimacy ko democratic stability kaisa aise link kya hain yeh debate hum hi inse pehle is andaz peh hum hi muqtalif writers ko dekhne ke baad bhi yeh debate hum hi nahi milti aur pastor peh jise comparative analysis ke saath yani muqtalif mulkko ki case study ke saath unki examples ke saath in saare hakaik ko waze kiya gya conceptual debate ko link kiya gya yeh bohot unique contribution hai jo hame seh for seh lipset ke hain hi milta hain aur yeh hi bhaja hai ke lipset ka naam is context ke andar bohot zyada ahem consider kiya jata hai