 Welcome to the dynamic range test for the C500 where we also did a codec comparison between the MXF and the Canon RAW light. And this setup, the way we did set it up, we had a silk bounce, a 4x4 silk bounce that controlled the sunlight that was coming from the right side of the frame hitting the talent and we exposed in using T-stop increments in one stop increments to be able to expose the file. We did that for both the RAW and for both the MXF and you would clearly see from what I see on some of my scopes because I do not know how compression would translate this to screen. Up until 3 stops, we didn't lose any specular details like specular details that like highlights are way way high, those very shiny, glittering spots and we did have some light contamination if you look at the talent right arm on the frame from the sun side to the right side of the screen you can see some leakage or you could probably see some of the sun leaking being it the 4x4 bounce. Apart from that, most of the light that was around the face on the shirt were more consistent and which was what we proceeded with. And you could almost instantaneously see that even up to 6 stops where it becomes super unusable, there is so much detail that has been captured within that 2GB per second RAW. Now we go on to the next steps where you actually get to see the RAW vs the MXF. First thing that jumps out of you is the amount of detail that comes out from the RAW. This is not making the MXF look bad. Maybe for documentary sections where you need longer time and stuff that it controls into situations indoors, I'm sure the MXF would also deliver when exteriors but there is no denying the power of that RAW and every time it records RAW it natively records in siloq 2 which means you get the entire full dynamic range of the camera. Even if you did set it in camera to be like siloq 3 it doesn't bake that in. It records at the flattest profile in cinema gamut so you get that full 15 stops of canon awesomeness. And you begin to see how much amount of details, how much that 2GB of seconds what it means in the RAW when we actually move into the comparison where you get to see our displays. I would like to see your comments, what do you think about Canon RAW, what do you think about the camera itself, what do you think about the test. I look forward to your comments and in the next video we'll go about doing under exposure too.