 In the present socio-political environment existing in India, it will pave way for the systematic erasure of certain sections from what is counted as history, from what is counted as the social experiences of India. There is the systematic erasure of the subaltern classes, sections, caste and minorities from what is counted as India. This will be highly detrimental for the polyphonic character of India, its multiplicity, variety and plurality. Actually, this diversity should be reckoned as an asset of our nation, but instead NEP sees it as a burden, it calls it as fragmentation. It is a very wrong approach. NEP tends to homogenize things, imposing certain ideas related to Hindutva, which is highly different from Hindu Dharma. Their version of Hindutva is very constricted. We saw this in our everyday life. This will naturally get reflected. NEP is put into practice. As I told you earlier, these sections were very much there in India and they have contributed a lot for Indian culture, for example, the Muslims in India. The Mughal dynasty was very much here and during that period Muslim-Islam culture flourished and this has contributed a lot for Indian culture as a whole. We have Taj Mahal, Muslim architecture, Ghazals, Hindustani music. So our culture gets enriched by their presence. But in the present context, what we see is the erasure of their presence from Indian history. This is highly deplorable. Protests should be raised against such activities. Earlier, two glorious episodes from Kerala history disappeared from CBSE syllabus. One was Malabar mutiny, fought by the Muslims of Kerala. The second one was Chanar struggle, struggle for covering the breasts of women, Chanar women. Chanar women hailing from the backward sections. So this is a kind of obscurantism. What they try to do is a distortion of history. According to NEP, things will be regulated by a centralized agency called Rastriya Shiksha Ayog. From the pre-primary classes, for example Anganawadis, from Anganawadis to PhD, everything will be prescribed and controlled by this centralized agency RSA, Rastriya Shiksha Ayog, headed by Prime Minister. And they try to impose a kind of homogenization. As I told you earlier, the most important asset of India is its cultural diversity. So any kind of homogenization will sabotage the richness of Indian culture. Each university has its own organic quality, its specificities. They should address the immediate banning issues of the society around the universities. If you impose homogeneity, such specificities will be disappearing. This will be detrimental for both the educational sector and the society at large. Each university should be defined based on its genetics. They all have their own organic individuality. It should be maintained. This is what you call autonomy. In the PhD, a notice was issued in search of young researchers for establishing Manusmudi as a very appropriate text in Indian context. They wanted to assert that Manusmudi is superior to Indian constitution. Manusmudi was a text which was offered to ensure discipline in a very feudalistic kind of social arrangement, which was very hierarchical, which was based on Chaturvarnia, a pyramidal structure, age-old structure with untouchability and old. So actually Banaras Hindu University wanted to establish Manusmudi superior to Indian constitution. In a democratic country, in a democratic nation, Manusmudi will create far-reaching consequences, serious repercussions in the social fabric. Actually third quality universities come to India because in developed nations they seriously face the threats of economic, lack of economic stability. Economic problems are there. In order to handle with these, they start to establish open universities or their branches in other third world countries. They want to get money, profit-oriented motive is there behind this. And we wholeheartedly welcome such universities here. Universities will be detrimental to Indian universities and Indian culture as a whole. If you study in an Indian university, you study Indian culture. You study India's economical specificities, specificities related to the economic structure of India. But in a foreign university, you never pay attention to the specificities of Indian context. That is the difference. It will be more general related to their nation.