 Tlo what's poppin? We are on twitch. We are not edit that out We are live by the time you see this we won't be so you could just leave a like comment subscribe Turn on your post notification bells. Let's continue to grow the family from Chicago to the UK And if you do happen to miss any lives and you wanted to see anything that was good on there this behind me the lit one live That's where it will be Link down in the description. Don't forget. We do got the discord link down in the description for that and we also got the patreon the patreon keeps the The blood flowing the lifeline pays the bills You know I'm saying so I appreciate everybody who's over there or everybody who's thinking about coming over here And you know we post over there once a day. I didn't post today, but you know You will get one Saturday. That's how that go if I miss a day. I go out of place I've replaced everything on a Saturday Then movie requests for Sunday from the people who are in that tier Link down below now. This is I've been seeing this But I wanted to let like the whole thing play out and then react to it now Thomas Cashman jail for 42 year minimum for the murder of Olivia Corble I think that happened in Liverpool from Yeah, you have it in Liverpool 42 year minimum that is I'm not gonna lie. That's the highest That's the highest minimum sentence I've ever seen out the out of the UK and It's well deserved. He did need that. He'd need life He'd need life With no possible parole And if he was in Texas, you know what he'd get He'd be Texas would put that boy in the dirt Anyway, let's get into this cameras in court. Please stand by Thomas Cashman is to be sentenced today for the murder of Olivia Pratt Corbell the intent of murder of Joseph Wounding Cheryl Corbell with the intent and two firearms offenses Mr. Cashman has been brought to court today that has refused to come from the cells to be sentenced. I Have directed that he should do so that he has maintained his refusal. I Am therefore left with no choice, but to sentence him in his absence These sentencing remarks will be made available to him in writing All five offenses arise out of the events of the 22nd of August 2022 Where? Okay, okay. Yeah and armed with two guns the defendant set out to kill Joseph knee He lay in wait before opening fire in a residential street CCTV footage captured him standing over mr. Knee shooting at close range When the first gun malfunctioned mr. Knee was able to scramble away, but the defendant had his second gun ready He relentlessly pursued mr. Knee Causing him to seek refuge by barging into the home occupied by Olivia's family Undeterred and wholly unconcerned for the safety of others. He continued to shoot at Joseph knee firing into that family home Olivia just nine years old heard the commotion from her bed Unsurprisingly she came downstairs to seek the comfort of her mother Her last words were mum. I'm scared In a terrible twist of fate she had stepped directly into the line of fire As her mother battled to keep the front door closed the defendant fired a shot that perched straight through the door Then through Cheryl Corbell's wrist and into Olivia's chest killing her The defendant then managed to get his hand. That's my worst fear. That's why I moved from Chicago I could not have something like that happen to my dog. That's how I had to go My worst fear man RIP My condolences to the family And inside the door and fired another shot inside the house Fortunately the door was closed on his hand and the bullet discharged into the door frame avoiding the people inside For the murder of Olivia, there is only one sentence that can be passed. That is a mandatory life sentence Let there be no misunderstanding about this The sentence will be one of life imprisonment That means that the defendant may spend the rest of his days in prison You know man sometimes they could they be trying to give Man slaughter and what like no, I wasn't aiming at him. I didn't mean I know that was the I know that was his solicitors case But yeah, no, however for reasons. I shall explain. This is not a case which requires a whole life order. I Must therefore specify the minimum term which must elapse before the defendant can apply to be released on license That is the shortest period that he will be required to serve in prison There is no guarantee that he will in fact be released at that stage That will be a matter for the parole board I will specify sentences for the other offenses, but they will be served concurrently with the sentence for murder Which will concurrence That's at the same time, right? They should have stacked them off Reflect Yeah, after you done with this one your next one start. Yeah after you done with that next one your next one start The totality of the offending The killing of Olivia Pratt corbell is an offense that shocked not only the city of Liverpool, but the nation Olivia's name is likely to be remembered for many years She should not be remembered only for her dreadful last moments Her family have spoken today of Olivia in life And of the hopes and dreams for her future which was so cruelly snatched away It is plain that Olivia was a lovely little girl who cared for others And brightened the lives of her family and friends They have suffered an unimaginable loss which they must carry for the rest of their lives Nothing I say or do today will ease that But they should know that they have my sympathy The mental scars from that night will persist forever Cheryl Corbell must also bear the physical scars on her wrist and hand She must have suffered terrible pain as the bullet passed through her body But her bravery and strength is obvious She had fought to keep the trouble outside and she ignored the pain as she desperately tried to save Olivia The need for her to receive emergency treatment meant that she could not be with her daughter when she died Nobody suggests that the defendant intended to kill Olivia or to harm Cheryl But even if he did not know Olivia was in the firing line, the same cannot be said about Cheryl She opened her door and stepped outside to see what was happening She immediately recognized the gravity of the situation and hurried back to get inside and secure her home It will have been apparent to the defendant that she was not connected with now Me personally probably when she opened the door do try to run in the crib And get protection like me personally. I'm one of the best Literally I'm one of the best you'll ever see at mind in my business I would have never done that Not saying it's her fault or anything. I'm just saying what I wouldn't I wouldn't open no door at the sound of gunfire Joseph me and was trying to keep him out He knew therefore that a holy innocent woman was by the door And yet that is where he chose to take aim Had he paused to think for one moment It would have been obvious that this was a family home and this he couldn't pause the thing. He wasn't in control of himself He was running off pure emotion He didn't have control of his mind his thoughts. He wasn't moving like a man Others perhaps including children were at risk But the defendant was focused only on the murder of joseph knee and no one else mattered to him Precisely what lay behind the attempt on joseph knee's life has not emerged The court did not hear from him and the defendant was certainly not willing to share the truth On his own evidence the defendant led a criminal lifestyle In the course of which he was prepared to use threats and violence Mr. Knee was a man with enemies who had been shot at previously That provides the context for what happened Whatever mr. Knee may have done it plainly did not justify the attempt on his life He suffered serious injuries and is lucky to be alive After things went so tragically wrong The defendant went to the home of the woman who was brave enough to come to court to give evidence against him And mr. Knee bogus too How you going to put the innocent family in jeopardy because of the life you live He know exactly why he was in that situation We can all guess why he was in that situation But he gonna run up in them innocent people career like that. He bogus for that I have made an order granting her lifelong anonymity and will not name her now Her evidence was significant as they both realized She chose to do the right thing The defendant invented a defense designed to humiliate and undermine her It did not work She was subjected to lengthy questioning about the most intimate details that she stood firm I am sorry that she had to endure that but endure it. She did and her courage is to be applauded In sentencing for the murder of Olivia Pratt-Corebell I must follow the statutory provisions set out in schedule 21 of the sentencing act 2020 Paragraph 2 2 b a of schedule 21 Provides that the starting point for the murder of a child Involving a substantial degree of planning or pre-meditation is a whole life order I have considered whether that applies to this case But have concluded it does not because the planning and pre-meditation was not directed at the child There is no doubt though that's the seriousness of the murder Taken in combination with the other offenses is particularly That's why that that legal jargon come into play like oh, yeah This schedule this this stature this schedule c 6 9 2 4 5 Filly grave such as to require a lengthy minimum term Sentence that man with your heart The starting point for any murder involving a firearm is 30 years as set out in paragraph 3 of schedule 21 I must then consider the aggravating and mitigating factors set out in paragraphs 9 and 10 Together with any other relevant circumstances There can be no doubt that this shooting involved a significant degree of planning and pre-meditation I bear in mind that many if not most murders involving firearms Involve some pre-meditation And that is already accounted for in the starting point The evidence in this case demonstrates planning going well beyond that The defendant had sourced two guns presumably to allow for the possibility of one misfiring He knew what van joseph knee was driving and i'm sure that he was looking out for him earlier that day Having spotted his van he changed his clothes and concealed his face before heading towards him Only to realize that mr. Knee had left Later having seen the van again and realizing mr. Knee was likely to remain where he was until the end of the televised football The defendant again changed his clothes He camped out on him all day Yeah, that much camping man. He didn't that's a revenge type Into position and lay in wait This was a targeted planned execution attempt It commenced in a residential street Even as mr. Knee run for his life the defendant ruthlessly pursued him He then fired more shots as mr. Knee tried to take cover in a determined effort to complete what he had set out to do It is accepted on the defendant's behalf that olivia was a particularly vulnerable victim because of her age I do not necessarily agree that olivia's age made her more vulnerable to being killed in these specific circumstances But it is academic to debate whether the case comes within paragraph nine b The real gravity of this case is that a young child was shot and killed in her own home As children do olivia was coming downstairs to seek reassurance Cheryl corbell should have been able to give that reassurance and to tuck olivia back into bed What's happened instead was chilling and strikes fear not only into the immediate community But also into the minds of other children and their parents Shooting into a family home with no regard for who may be caught in the crossfire Is obviously a very significant aggravating factor Which must be reflected in the minimum term that's that's all the If we speak in politics that that go a lot that go that go against a lot of gang politics if he was in if he was Involved in that nature of anything He will he will probably be dealt with accordingly once he gets to HMP wherever he gone None of the statutory mitigating factors apply in this case While right that there was no intent to kill olivia The fatal shot was fired with the clearest possible intent to kill And I have determined that the shooting was premeditated The fact that the intent was directed towards joseph knee offers no mitigation Had the defendant planned to kill olivia, he would have been facing a whole life order Even had the defendant killed joseph knee rather than olivia The premeditated nature of the killing The use of two firearms And the firing of shots into a family home would still have required a substantial uplift Well, I don't get why are they why is she telling us about if ands or you know, I'm saying what ifs like Just The fact that it was olivia who died Undoubtedly makes the offense more serious still Yes Further, I am not considering this offense in isolation The defendant must also be sentenced for the other offenses I shall take care not to double count features that are common to counts one to three I am very conscious that the shot that killed olivia was one of those aimed at joseph knee while attempting to kill him And was the same shot that wounded charol corbell However, I must reflect the fact that the harm caused was not limited to killing olivia But also included serious injury to two other people Had I been sentencing the defendant for the attempt of murder of joseph knee alone I would have imposed a life sentence because of the obvious risk of serious harm. He poses to members of the public I agree with the submissions that this is a category a two case within the relevant sentencing guideline That gives a starting point of a determinant sentence of 30 years And a range of 25 to 35 years Even in the context of a category a case the offense is aggravated by the planning The relentless pursuit of mr. Knee and the use of two firearms So I will select Select a figure towards the upper end of the range In setting the minimum term to be served on a discretionary life sentence The notional term should be discounted by one third to reflect the early release provisions which apply to a determinant sentence I need not dwell further on the minimum term for count two Since it will make no practical difference to the minimum term which must be served which will be that imposed on count one For count three wounding Cheryl corbell with intent to do grievous bodily harm to another The offense falls into category a two in the relevant guideline Giving a starting point of seven years imprisonment and a range of six to ten years The offense is aggravated by being committed against a woman in her own home And I consider this a sentence at the top of that range is appropriate But it won't matter because it's going to congruent with the first one. So About 30 years why I say 42 firearms offenses charged as counts four and five are pass and parcel of the other offenses It will be wholly artificial to consider the appropriate sentence for these two offenses had they stood alone They are category a one offenses within the relevant guideline The sentences on these counts will not impact on the overall term the defendant must serve It is therefore unnecessary to say more and I will simply adopt the starting point suggested by the guideline Namely 18 years imprisonment I have explained the approach to the sentences for the individual offenses only so that the defendant and others Know how I have arrived at the eventual sentence which I impose Okay, the reality is that the defendant's offending cannot be compartmentalized And the minimum term to be served will reflect the totality of his offending The defendant murdered Olivia Pratt-Cawbell a young child in her own home He did so in the course of attempting to murder joseph knee As part of a planned and sustained attack involving the use of two firearms He caused serious injuries to mr. Knee and came close to killing him He also shot Cheryl corbell Causing her significant physical injury to say nothing of the psychological scars. He caused her and others That is the basis on which he will be sentenced The defendant is now age 34. He is not of previous good character Any attempt to rely on an absence of any significant history of violence Has to be viewed in the context of what he told the jury He made it quite clear That he was a criminal who used threats and violence when it suited him Although I will not treat that as aggravation. There is no mitigation to be found in his history The defendant has not acknowledged his responsibility for Olivia's death and so has demonstrated no remorse Yeah Well, you ain't acknowledging nothing or or remorseful. They give you the top of every piece of a sentence you can get His failure to come into court is perhaps further evidence of that Although I'm trying to get on demon time. I gotta be a demon in jail They're from 42 him They make it clear that this has not caused me to increase his sentence Shoulder The defendant is a father and I accept that being taken away from his children is a loss for him and for them It's a loss for them He should have been thinking about that before he was running down somebody in broad daylight and shooting in the crib That he is wholly responsible for There is in my judgment, no real mitigation available to the defendant I now pronounce the sentence On count one for the murder of Olivia pratt corbell The sentence will be life imprisonment The minimum term will be 42 years Less the time the defendant has already spent on remarmed On count two the attempted murder of joseph knee The sentence is life imprisonment with a minimum term of 22 years Everything else is irrelevant 42 years. She already ran down the rundown 42 years. He's 34. He'd be out at 76 Yeah, all right That boy's gonna wither up in there till I leave a like comment. I'm gone man. R. I. P Conduces to the family