 The opportunity to explain a little bit what we are doing. I am not a lawyer to start with, I'm closer to Pete and what he's been doing. So it's also very good I think with the presentation from Peter because you could have a flavor of what is the job of a researcher now, which is extremely complex. I think you just got a flavor and the specificity also of this department, this DG that I represent is that we as the European Commission through DG research, we found researchers, Pete mentioned the project Future TDM, which is one of the projects that we found through Science Within For Society. But also we found projects in different fields, environment, transportation, so when you see one difficulty in one field, you can multiply it by all the different fields. I don't have a presentation, I just have a note presentation but I would like to go quickly through it otherwise I would speak for half an hour. There are indeed lots of mid concepts about text and data mining and I think for a couple of years and thanks to institutions like the department but also lots of work initiated with the Commission starting with licenses, license for Europe a couple of years ago, TDM became a little bit a focus. It was an issue which for us is very important representing research and innovation but for many stakeholders research and innovation is not that important. So I think in a remit of copyright TDM represents only one little aspect but it's a very very important aspect especially when the Commission, the Parliament and member states themselves put so much emphasis on importance of research and innovation for development of goods, employment and such and such. We are using, we're used to working with various stakeholders. You're on the table, represent some of the stakeholders. Of course in the research we are closer traditionally to the academics, in particular the representatives of universities but also research librarians and also innovators and such but I will try to speak with one voice. The European Commission has many brains, many heads but tries to speak with one voice and just give you a few thoughts. One of the objectives, one of the many objectives I think of the European Commission is when it comes to research and innovation is to optimize the impact of publicly funded research and this is why what Pete tried to explain to you is important. There's a question of time, time is money, money spent, overspent, re-spent, that's none of us want. I say us, I mean us because as the Commission we fund research but also all of us around the table because our governments also fund research so we try to be coherent in the European Commission with you know what we preach and what we do, what we say to member states and try to make, e.g. with the revision of the directive and what we try also to find a solutions for their own research that we fund. So we have different strategies and one of the strategies is the digital single market. What also is quite important to stress in the life of researchers, a big difference with the producers of cultural products is that scientific researchers are both the producers, the authors of goods, but they're also the consumers and the readers which is not necessarily the case for us when we consume cultural products for instance and as authors scientific researchers are not paid, they don't have any kind of fair remuneration or royalties, etc. Researchers in universities in publicly funded research centers are paid to do the research job which includes disseminating the results to their peers which includes also peer reviewing results of others, etc. And all this is done for free in a sense it's part of their job. So that puts also a different aspect I think on the issue of copyright. And the parenthesis, they're not completely stupid, of course they don't have a financial reward but their reward is to be cited by their peers so there's another mechanism in place for the evaluation of the research. We saw that Texanata mining which is now the kind of nickname that we're all using at least in Brussels concerns text without the difficulties with the text but also data and data we could add also some audiovisual aspect in archaeology, artifacts and such. So data means a lot of different results of research. Maybe we'll talk later about licenses but maybe if there are some questions but I wouldn't like to talk right now about the licenses but also rather about our experience during the last couple of years. We see that the year 2015 is quite rich of analysis especially from the three main European institutions. We heard about the communication from the Commission from 6th of May, the communication on the digital single market. I don't want to read the text but I mean if you have a look at the section on TDN you will see for instance the fact that the Commission talks about innovation in research for both non-commercial and commercial purposes which I think is quite interesting and I'll say a few words about that. Commission talks about an unclear legal framework about divergent approaches at national level, talks about enabling researchers to make a wider use of material, talking about also cross-border collaboration because research is completely international. So that's one thing. Second thing also, a second document that was important this year are the conclusions from the Council a few months later and of May. The 28th Member States made this declaration on open and data-intensive research talking about the promotion of innovation driven by TDM taking into account research needs and such. Also 28th Member States agreeing on the fact that we have to talk about TDM and last but not least in the European Parliament in July the adoption of the other report that was headed by Yuyah Reda. I like also the 0.48 it's okay it asks the Commission which stresses the need to properly assess TDM but I think it shows at least a basic consensus in the Parliament on which some of you on the table here can work. Now what do we have? We have, and again I'm not a lawyer but if I understand the legislation from 2001 there was a legislator at the time and they tentatively addressed the specific situation of scientific research and that's a famous exception. Now in 2015, soon 2016 and this is where the new legislator can update, find you the original exception for research and find a long-term solution. So without entering into the details we have, we indeed research being close to researchers to the various academics. We have our little ideas that maybe I can talk about during the Q&A's but we, where are we now? So now we see with the revision of the copyright directive we have TDM which is one aspect. We make it quite big this evening because this is our focus, our center of attention but it's only one aspect. Then the Commission wants to be pragmatic, wants to have a targeted copyright modernization and what is being proposed since it's a very complex, very rich dossier. I think it's not a secret, I mean this has been said now for a couple of weeks in Brussels, is to have a communication by the end of this year that will set the scene and put forward a working plan for this modernization of the copyright environment in the EU and that would be the first step with tackling a few specific copyright issues that are not of direct interest to TDM but in that second step which is scheduled for spring 2016 then we would have a complete set of legislative proposals and solutions and this is where we could see TDM tackled. It's a work which is in the making. You can understand that for us, for all the colleagues in the Commission for the top management it's never nice to delay a little bit the things. It would have been of course much better to come up with, as promised, to come up with a proposal by the end of this year but as you know it's been so difficult to tackle all the aspects that this has been necessary. To finish I would like to say that I'm very proud of the dialogue that we always have had on TDM during the last couple of years, in particular since the experience of licenses for Europe. In particular the academics really showed their muscle. They wanted to be heard and I think they have been heard in Brussels. There have been a few press releases, workshops etc. There's also the famous The Hague Declaration that was launched in May this year. So you have academics, open access publishers that don't think that the publishers are all the same. You have also some breeds of open access publishers that try to find solutions. Innovative industries, I didn't talk a lot about industries but innovative industries also have been very helpful in the dialogue during the last couple of years and those stakeholders and some of you are on the table are helping us to find a solution. What we want in the end as a conclusion and I say we it's a collective because I think I can really say it's the commission also is to give European researchers and European innovators the best conditions to do their job and finding some solutions for data analytics, for taxonata mining, I think is part of what we're trying to do. Thank you.