 Status of Governors and Governed Because the basic subject matter in discussing different types of regime is to address the conditions and relations between those who govern and those being governed. Basically, we are here in this session going to discuss the difference between the governs and the governed. That is, those people who are ruling and those people who are being governed, we have to understand the nature of relationship between these two and what is the difference in their status. We have to discuss this in detail. Because in democratic regimes, are characterized by broad consensus and representation based relationship between governed and governess. Because what is the characteristic of democracy? That there will be a wide variety of consensus between the two. And on the basis of representation, the people above who have sovereignty, who are behind them, who have their own people, whose votes are capable of conquering them. And what should be the most important characteristic of those people? That is the factor of accountability. Because they know that the people who have made us the rulers, we are accountable in front of them. They can ask questions, talk to us, and we have to go back to them. Because their votes are required if we have to enjoy this status again. So we can say that those people who are in democracy, who are under the control of the ruler, who are under the control of the ruler, what is the most important part for them? That the power they have, that is basically a responsibility. That is, by exercising that power, they have to fulfill the responsibility according to their power. And the most important thing in that power is the element of accountability. And then, along with that, there are participatory systems. In the world, all those systems, those who do it on the basis that the force behind them is the participation of the people. If they do it on their own, they can't do it so efficiently. And if people lower the level of participation, then the legitimacy of these rulers will be challenged. It is quite an interesting factor because legitimacy gives the right to the rulers that they are the representative legal constitutional rulers. But if the representation of the people is reduced, people's votes don't have a trend. People think that by giving their votes, the system doesn't make any difference. So there, even if that ruler chooses a few less votes, their legitimacy will be debatable. So we can say that the factors like openness, accountability, representativeness, participation, then rule of law, then redistribution of resources on equal basis and electoral process basically determines the overall status of governors and governed in a democracy. That is, the most important thing is that are those people who are rulers, are they promoting the rule of law? If the law is equal to everyone in their view, and there is no difference between rich and poor, then people are satisfied and this is basically the basis of the rule of law. Then definitely another important component of redistribution of resources. That is, the resources in the country, in the state, are they communicating to people in such a way that improvement is coming in people's lives or improvement is coming in them. Because if improvement or improvement is not there, then people will not be satisfied with that system or that system. So if we want to summarize this, then we can say that the rulers, the rulers and those who are governed, improve and improve. Their nature of relationship is linked with the performance of the rulers.