 This device in some future where it's infinitely more powerful than it's right now could make me fall in love with somebody in the audience That's that goes to the question of consciousness and mind I don't think that we have the understanding of what consciousness is to Answer the question whether a non-organic consciousness is possible or is not possible I think we just don't know but again The bar for hacking humans is much lower The machines don't need to have consciousness of their own in order to predict our choices and manipulate our choices They just need to if you Accept that something like love is in the end a biological process in the body if you think that AI can provide us with wonderful healthcare by Being able to monitor and predict something like the flu or something like cancer What's the essential difference between flu and love? in the sense of be is is this biological and this is something else which is so Separated from the biological reality of the body then that even if we have a Machine it's capable of monitoring a prediction flu It still lacks something essential in order to do the same thing with love So I want to make two comments, and this is where my engineering You know personality speaking We were making two very important assumptions in this in this part of the conversation One is that AI is so omnipotent that it's achieved to a state that it's beyond Predicting anything physical. It's got into the consciousness level and got into the the even the the ultimate the love level of Capability and I do want to make sure that we recognize that we're very very very far from that This technology is still very nice and part of the concern I have about today's AI is that super hyping of It's capability so I'm not saying that that's not a valid question But I think that part of this conversation is built upon that assumption that this technology has become that powerful and there's I don't even know how many decades we are from that second related assumption. I feel we are our conversation is being based on this that We're talking about a world or a state of the world that owning that Powerful AI exists or that small group of people who have produced the powerful AI and is Intended to hack human are existing, but in fact our human society is so Complex there's so many of us, right? I mean humanity in its history have faced so many technology If we left it in the hands of a bad player alone without any regulation multinational collaboration rules laws moral codes that technology could have maybe not hack human But destroy human or hurt human in massive ways. It has happened, but by enlarge our society In a you know historical view is moving to a more civilized and controlled state So I think it's important to look at that greater society and and bringing other players and People into this dialogue. So we don't talk like there's only this omnipotent AI You know deciding it's gonna hack everything to the end