 Welcome back to Investor Intel at PDAC 2018. I'm pleased to be joined by Mark Chalmers. Mark is both the CEO of Energy Fuels, but also widely regarded as a resource and a person with a great deal of knowledge in the uranium and vanadium industries in the US. Mark, there's been a lot of attention to uranium production. Uranium prices have been depressed for a very long time, but there's been a lot of noise around section 232 in the last few days. Can you talk to me about that and about your role in it? Yes, yes, yes. Yeah, there has been a lot of discussion about section 232 in the recent media over steel and aluminum with a review that was done by the Department of Commerce and with the president. They were looking at pros and tariffs on making sure that the aluminum steel industry would remain strong in the United States and survive the current low prices. Now, with our case with the section 232 for uranium, the United States is the largest consumer uranium in the world, and yet we only produce about 5% of our requirements. And with these current low prices, if there isn't some relief, and relief could be in the form of higher uranium prices, just global world uranium prices or some sort of action that helps keep the prices up in the United States. Because we don't think that it's in the nation's best interest, both from the Department of Defense and from the nuclear generation capacity, which nuclear provides 20% of our electricity in the United States to only be producing 5% less than 5% of our requirements and securing a majority of our uranium or large portion of it, about 40% from Russia, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan. So our company joined UR Energy, the two of us jointly put in a petition to the Department of Commerce. We haven't heard that they've initiated the process, we expect them to initiate the process, but we think it's in the United States best interest to have a front in a nuclear fuel cycle of uranium mining in this country, certainly above the 4% or 5% that it currently is. Now with the steel situation they've looked to impose tariffs, my understanding is you guys have suggested going a different direction, correct? Well, yeah, we looked at a quota, a quota of up to 25% of the U.S. requirements. We also put in a provision for a buy American or preference buy American uranium. So, but I want to emphasize that, you know, the objective of the petition is to make sure that this front end of the nuclear fuel cycle survives, and we're very challenged right now, but we also understand that a number of the steps in the nuclear fuel cycle, including the nuclear generation, is challenged as well too. So we want an outcome that is going to allow us to survive, but also make sure that the nuclear industry in the United States stays healthy and robust going forward. Well, thank you very much for your time today, Mark, and we'll see you again soon.