 Welcome in, it is week eight. CMC is 49er, Resolve Tours ACL. We live in the upside down. Hi, I'm JL. I am joined by my co-host here, owner of lateround.com, Scott Melonby. How you doing today, Scott? Scott. Scott. I was put up to call you Scott Melonby. I was paid to do that. Oh, okay. Okay. Yes. I'm good. Champion. I don't know anything about NHL. Is Scott Melonby, was he good? That's like the deepest cut that you could have possibly thrown out there. I mean, it's been a long time. I'm pretty sure he was in NHL 94. Like, this is like a very random, very random. Is your friend Mike that in exchange for a t-shirt design, I had to introduce you to Scott Melonby because you used to wreck him, I believe, in NHL 94. That's right. That's right. Yeah, NHL 94, the floor, he played, Melonby I think was a panther because that was one of the first years of the Panthers War franchise. But yes. Yes, I used to, anyone in chat right now, I will wreck you in NHL 94, just a heads up, just so you guys know. But yeah, as Scott, you really threw me off. You know, I tell you, entering the show that I'm kind of under the weather today, my brain's probably not gonna work as well. And then you just call me Scott Melonby to start things, to kick things off. I could just see it in your brain. Like, you're like, wait, what? I'm joined by JJ Zachary's, and you know him. He needs no introduction. We're here to answer some waiver wire questions. Week eight, this feels like the time where fantasy champions are made. It's make or break time, fantasy league. JJ, we got a lot of big news too this week. A lot of big news. Breece Hall going down ACL. James Robinson getting traded to the Jets. What are you doing with that situation, the James Robinson situation? Michael Carter on the waiver. How are you feeling about it? Yeah, I mean, look, if Carter's out there, I would still be adding him. Like I, the way that you could think of this is, Breece Hall is a better running back than James Robinson is. I know that James Robinson is a great story, and I loved him as a prospect coming out. And I had a high when James Robinson was great his rookie season. So I'm coming at this from the perspective of, I like James Robinson people. Okay, this isn't me hating on the dude. But we have to recognize that he has not been good this season. Like his success rate has not been strong. Advanced metrics don't like him. You know, he's had some big plays where, you know, he's been able to be fine enough in fantasy at times, but there's a reason why Travis ETM was seeing more and more work in that offense over the last month or so. There's a reason why after week three or so I had James Robinson as a sell on my 15 transaction shows because typically when running back start to perform poorly or they are performing poorly, something starts to shift, something changes unless, you know, it's a guy like Joe Mixon or something where the back feel, you know, there's not an obvious player to sort of take over that work. So, you know, James Robinson is fine. He's gonna see early downwork. He's gonna see probably goal line work in the Jets offense, but I'm still not sure that the Jets are going to be this like, you know, I don't think that they're gonna finish with four or five losses this season. And so in any negative game script, Michael Carter is gonna be on the field. I think Carter is a really underrated player himself. I mean, it was a good prospect and has had good efficiency metrics himself. So I'm sort of in this boat where like, you know, I do have James Robinson ranked ahead of Michael Carter rest of season, but I do think that people probably believe that Michael Carter is toast based on this James Robinson move where, you know, they're just replacing Breece Hall with James Robinson, but Breece Hall is a much better running back in a much bigger threat to Michael Carter was to Michael Carter than James Robinson is. So to me, I think Carter can still be like, you know, PPR formats, maybe a low end two, high end three or mid three RB three James Robinson, not that much better than that. So, you know, I'm not like overly high on either guy, but if Michael Carter is out there, I would definitely be adding this week. Yeah, no, I would be too. He looked, he looked good that like first week, I remember watching him just thinking Michael Carter is gonna be so annoying this year. All the Breece Hall, all the Breece Hall managers are gonna be so annoyed at Michael Carter. And then he kind of got marginalized. And hopefully this is an opportunity for him to step up and show what he's got. From the reminder, if you haven't already hit that like button, subscribe to Fandal on YouTube, Twitch, TikTok, all everything underneath me. Just go ahead and subscribe to all the socials. Fandal's got amazing content creators, but not content all the time. Did you, we got a question in here from Victor asking, should I stream tight ends until in Joku gets back or trade one of either Kamara or Pierce for Andrews? Running backs are Kamara, Pierce, Swift, Stevenson, Foreman and Pacheco. What do you think, JJ? I mean, look, my rest of season rankings has Andrews one spot ahead of Kamara. And I think you can make the argument very easily that he should be, that you should take Mark Andrews over Pierce because I have Alvin Kamara over Pierce. You know, Pierce is someone who I think is very strong. Like I still have him, I'm referencing my rankings here on my other monitor. I still have him like a mid RB two, high end RB two rest of season. So I still like Damian Pierce, don't get me wrong. They do have a very tough schedule the rest of season. They have the six toughest in terms of my adjusted fantasy points allowed metric. It's the third hardest over the next four weeks. So, you know, I don't mind Pierce, but just keep that in mind. But regardless, I have Andrews ahead of both of those players rest of season. I mean, Andrews coming off that down game, I understand, but he was banged up a little bit last week. He didn't practice today, but Tuesday practices don't matter. I would expect a bounce back from him rest of season. So if you want to trade Pierce for him, I think that's totally fine. But if you want to stream, that's also totally fine. Cause I do think that there are enough tight ends out there these days where, you know, like Irv Smith this week going up against Arizona, great, great matchup. You know, he'll see probably a 13, 14% target share. He should be fine, you know, in that kind of matchup. So if you want to do that until when Joku comes back, totally fine. But I'm also cool with sending Pierce for, for Mark Andrews. Yeah, yeah. I think that is a fair trade. Buddy and you're asking Ken Walker and Singletary for Amon Ross St. Brown. Would you make this trade? No, I wouldn't because I have Kenneth Walker ahead of Amon Ross St. Brown alone, rest of season. There you go. You know, I love Amon Ross St. Brown. I'm hopeful that he's going to play this week. After that concussion, non-concussion situation that's going on, I think that the word is a taxia that I learned this week about how when you lose control of your muscles and your clumsy, that's what he displayed. It's like a symptom, right? So he's showing these symptoms on the field that he was showing clumsiness and like his muscles weren't reacting the way that they should react. But he wasn't actually concussed, but they still took him out of the game because he was showing those symptoms, which I know is frustrating, but you know, props to the Lions for actually following protocol and you know, not putting him in harm's way. But rest of season, I mean, Kenneth Walker to me is, he's RB 10 for me, rest of season, which is more valuable. You know, it's a scarcer position. You know, Amun Ra, I love him like I said, but to me, you know, he's more like wide receiver, nine, 10. And so I would rather lean running back in most case, depends on your scoring, depends on your situation, of course, but the fact that you're throwing in single Terry as well, who I think is a low-end RB two, you know, I just don't, I don't think some, I don't think this kind of move is worth it. You can get a lot more for Kenneth Walker. Yeah, Kenneth Walker. I mean, there are a few running backs of the opportunity that he has right now, right? So that to me is the difference. Amun Ra St. Brown, definitely I agree with you. I'm not necessarily down on him, but it's just the difference between the types of players and the position. I'd rather have a running back like Kenneth Walker than Amun Ra St. Brown, who I feel like can be more easily replaced. Yeah. Mr. Scamver said, I too know how to cheat at NHL 94. There's no cheating. There's just being good at the game. 94 is a good year, by the way. Best year, some might say. Not me, but some others. Five o'clock shadow jail is best jail, thanks Joey. Simon's saying, would you prefer to add Michael Carter or Isaiah Pacheco? Well, I think last time we were on the stream, we were talking about how Pacheco was so disappointing. Yeah, we got a Pacheco situation. Carter or Pacheco? Yeah, look, I mean, right now, the good news is that Isaiah Pacheco played more snaps. He's more involved in the offense. He played more snaps and Clyde Edwards a layer this past week. He played one more. And slowly, but surely he looks like the most explosive back in that backfield. It is a committee. That's what we should expect moving forward is a committee. But I do think that he's the type of player that profiles as that like playoff league winning type guy where he not only could just take over that backfield towards the end of the year, but if there's an injury to either Jared McKinnon or Clyde Edwards a layer, Pacheco all of a sudden becomes like a low end, maybe like a mid RB3 or something in fantasy football from a usage standpoint just right away. And obviously Kansas City. I mean, Kansas City has 27 touchdowns this year on offense, which is by far the most of the NFL. So obviously situationally, it's a very good situation, but I think Michael Carter is the dude that you want to add if you need that immediate production. Pacheco has more upside simply because of the offense that he's in the situation that he's in, but clearly the Jets don't think Michael Carter is in every downback. They wouldn't have traded for James Robinson if they thought Michael Carter could be in every downback. But I do think that if you just need production like the safe analyst answer is to add Michael Carter, if you get that production, I still think he can be an RB3 like I said earlier. I think that's the direction that you should go. Even though they named Pacheco the starter this week, are you still expecting a somewhat of an even rotation the rest of season between CEH, Jared McKinnon and Isaiah Pacheco? Yeah, you know, there's a lot of like misunderstanding going on with what that report was all about. So Rappaport came out and he tweeted that and he put an article together that said that Isaiah Pacheco was going to start for Kansas City. And a lot of people read the headline. They're like, oh, that just means he's going to start. He's going to get the first touch, which he did. He did get the first touch in that game for Kansas City. But it was actually deeper. The breakdown was deeper than that. It said that Clyde Edwards-Eleer would still be involved, but the way that the rotation would work where Pacheco was sort of like an afterthought out of the other two with Jared McKinnon and Clyde Edwards-Eleer, McKinnon would be that afterthought with Pacheco being in the CEH role and CEH maybe being in that Jared McKinnon role. So there was like this little rotation going on. But what happened is Kansas City at the end of the first half, they were in this negative game script or they were in this hurry up and Jared McKinnon was their hurry up back. So he was just seeing a ton of snaps in those environments and in those situations. And so Jared McKinnon played the most snaps for Kansas City, but Isaiah Pacheco did play more snaps in Clyde Edwards-Eleer. A lot of people in fantasy football, I mean, I try to preach patience all the time. I mean, I think Travis ETN is the perfect example of that of just being patient and letting things play out a little bit. These flips don't happen immediately without an injury, right? Like Kenneth Walker is one of the best running backs in fantasy football now. And that would have never been the case if not for a Rashad Penny injury. It would have been a, maybe it would have happened eventually but it would have been a slow burn, right? It would have been, okay, now he has a 30% snap share. Now it's a 40% snap share, et cetera, et cetera. It's going to be a slow burn without an injury for Isaiah Pacheco. I just think that's the way that it's going to go if it happens. Because obviously it might not happen too. So right now he's a high upside stash. You might be able to throw him in and you're flexed during bi-weeks. You know, I'm not, I don't think that we should sell it as anything different because all the evidence suggests that it is a committee but he's inching up and he is getting more work within that committee. Yeah, I feel like I'm constantly talking about how running backs are not valued in the NFL the same way that they're valued in fantasy, right? They're just not used in the same way. And there's no, from when I think about this from the perspective of Andy Reed, why wouldn't he use all of the options available to him if neither one of them is standing out amongst the rest? Right. Right, so it seems logical. Should I start, this is from Jonathan. Should I start Prescott or get another QB? So should you start Dak Prescott or maybe pick a QB off the waiver wire, stream a QB this week? What are you thinking? I mean, Dak is not in a terrible spot. I haven't done a ton of research yet for the week eight slate, but from like a streaming standpoint, like I would assume that I'm gonna have Daniel Jones around the same areas where Dak is just from a ranking standpoint, I haven't finished those or done those yet. So, you know, Dimes is probably like the one guy that I would consider over Dak, but I think Dak's fine. I mean, the matchup, because they get Chicago this week, the matchups, not horrific, but I wouldn't be shocked if I do have Daniel Jones ahead of him this week. Yeah, I think that's fair. Daniel Jones, man. It's giants, they're playing lights out. I don't know what's happening over there. Let's see, we got John. That's the same question. Mr. Campers asking half PPR, would you drop either Michael Carter and or Bateman, shot Bateman to add Devin Singletary and or Tyler Boyd? I would not be dropping, I wouldn't be dropping either of those guys for Tyler Boyd. You know, Boyd, there was a good matchup form this week, some broken coverage. I mean, he's fine, but he's not someone that I'm like eager to pick up. Devin Singletary needs to be added. Devin Singletary in any 10 plus team league, eight plus team league should be on rosters. I would rather have Singletary than both of those guys. I would definitely rather have them than Carter. I think in an ideal scenario, depending on what you, you know, the way that I sort of manage my bench is it's an extension of what my starting roster doesn't have, right? So if I'm good at wide receiver, then my bench is going to have more running backs than wide receivers. So it just depends. Like I think that you can go either way with Bateman and Carter, but Singletary is the best player of those four in fantasy. Yeah, yeah, I'm with you. Tyler Boyd, it feels like he always has these types of games. Simon, my co-host on our morning show in front yard fantasy talks about Tyler Boyd used a lot of teams where they're weak against slot wide receiver. And so you can usually kind of predict where he's going to pop off on these, because that's how the bangles like to utilize him. So yeah, I like that point. And Mr. Scamber is also following up with is Josh Palmer and IR must dash with the Allen slash Williams injuries? No, I mean, like Josh Palmer's had his opportunity this season and he's been horrible. So I'm not like, I think that he's fine to add. I just don't think he's really like this priority this week because they're on buy. And I don't think a lot of your league mates are probably going to be aggressive to get him. I mean, sure, add him. But I just, I don't think that he's a player who is necessarily going to just dominate with Mike Williams out. And we don't know exactly how long Williams is going to be out just yet. But I do think that, like, if you want to stash him, totally fine, but I don't think he's like in the same tier as adding a Gus Edwards or a Michael Carter even this week, you know, just cause he's already had opportunity this year and he hasn't really captured. Yeah. Yeah. That makes a ton of sense. Kind of saying Zach Taylor, great at exploiting matchups. Max. Yeah, that's him. That's him. Alibaz, God's asking, should I trade away T Higgins for Amunra St. Brown? And we talk about these one-for-one position trades frequently on these shows, JJ. Is this one of those musical chair-type trades, as you call them? 100%. There's just like, there's no reason to do this trade because someone's absolutely going to lose the trade in some way. It's the same position. They're two-spot different in my rankings. So, you know, I don't, there's no reason to have like a strong feeling between these two, in my opinion. It's just, you know, neither team is really benefiting at the end of the day. Like one team will, one team won't. Whenever in trades, both teams should benefit. So, you know, if you want to do that, that's fine. I do technically have Amunra two-spots ahead, but I just don't think it's necessary. Yeah, the way I often describe that concept is like trading is a cooperative mechanic in a non-zero sum game, right? So like you and your lead major are cooperating to increase both of your chances to win the lead. So you want, you know, that's, whenever you put it, you're in a position like this, what JJ is saying is like, one side has to lose or not because there is no way for both sides to duel unless they're perfectly even, in which case it was pointless anyway. Right, whereas you could say, okay, I'm trading Amunra, same brown for Kenneth Walker, like we were talking about earlier, where I do have Walker ahead and all that kind of stuff. But at the end of the day, like you could hypothetically get away with doing that trade if you were really, really good at running back and you could get rid of Kenneth Walker, which a lot of teams could, I mean, there's a lot of teams out there that drafted Kenneth Walker late and now they're just set and they might not, you know, they have like really good running backs. And so they need a wide receiver. And so you can make a trade like that in order for both teams to get better, even if Kenneth Walker outperforms Amunra, same brown rest of season, it's still okay enough because both teams are technically getting better in their starting lineup. When you're trading the same position, one player is objectively going to be doing better and it's the same lineup slot. So there's just no reason to do something like that. Yeah, yeah, great break down there. John Doe asking 10 team family league through ESPN, with and Joku out, looking at Dulcich or Ashad White to replace him for a while, trying to gauge different opinions with those two. Aten is also on the waivers. So out of those options there, Dulcich, Ashad White and Kate Otten, I believe that's how you say his name. Which of those guys are you most interested in? I mean, I think Ashad White should be rostered in a lot of leagues right now and the majority of them, you know, he has some flex appeal. He played 44% of their snaps this past week against Carolina the week before that. It was his lowest snap rate in a while. It was 22% against Pittsburgh. So you're seeing this rise. He has a 50% success rate this season. Leonard Fornette has a 45% success rate. So he's playing well. You know, I don't think he's gonna overtake that backfield and become Leonard Fornette and see this like 80% snap share, but he's been good and he has the handcuff appeal, right? Like this is the time of year where you gotta be paying attention to that kind of stuff where if a guy goes down, then that backup, he's one of the handful where, you know, that backup would be viable in fantasy football. So I think where Ashad White needs to be rostered for sure, the other guys are relatively replaceable week in and week out from a tight end streaming standpoint. Like if you wanna throw, you know, if Rashad White's on your waiver wire, I'm gonna assume that like Irv Smith is on your waiver wire. And you like, I would play Irv Smith over Dulcich this week, for instance. So like there's plenty of tight ends. If you need a tight end, you could stream over those guys. Rashad White though is someone that really should be rostered. The other thing to note here with Rashad White, Leonard Fornette has never played a full season in the NFL. He's always missed at least one game. So if and when that happens, Rashad White is in the RB two conversation. Wow, I did not know that's that. It's kind of crazy. Remember the whole narrative whenever he came into the league and it was like, he doesn't like the cold. So he's just not playing the cold. Yeah, yeah, that's pretty funny. Cade and the Colts fan asking, who are some of the running backs I should go after I have lost, Javante, Breece, have Jefferson, Godwin, Allen and Lamb. So these questions are kind of tough. They're kind of tough because they're, it's tough to gauge what your league mates are, you know, what the trade value of your league is. And of course there's all the options, right? So I would suggest a good friend of ours, Peachton High School, who puts out these trade market values. I suggest going and looking there and seeing what the market is valuing some of these players at. Yeah. Yeah, players you have. Go ahead, JJ. The biggest problem with the way that people approach trades, and I'm not trying to call out Cade and the Colts fan here, because, you know, there's a lot of people who feel this way. But when you go and approach trade, you shouldn't just approach these individual players you want to trade for. Because what happens if you say, hey, I want to, I want to go trade for Daryl Henderson this week. But you go look at the Daryl Henderson team and Daryl Henderson is the RB one on that team. The chance that that team is going to get rid of their RB one, despite the fact that it's Daryl Henderson, is slim. Whereas if Daryl Henderson is the RB six on a team, then that team's going to have a lot easier time to give it up. It's just a basic, basic way of doing anything in sales, right? Like, this is just what you do. Like when someone has a lot of something, they're more willing to give it away. And so your consideration set when you go to trade for players should be vast. It should be very large. You should be very open to taking on a lot of players as opposed to which individual guy should I go after? Now, with that being said, there are instances where you can say, okay, the market is way too low on Raheem Mostert more than likely. Maybe I'll go to the Mostert manager and say, hey, I want to trade for Raheem Mostert. He might not realize that Mostert's been productive, et cetera, et cetera. That's fine. But the real way to get deals done is to find teams that need the thing that you're giving away or find teams that have too much of the thing that you want. Right, complementary teams. Those are the best ones to cooperate with in order to make those trades that you both get better and balance your teams out. Very well said. Andrew said, have Eckler and keep losing my RB2 to injuries. Yeah, join the club. Should I look to trade a pitman for Harris or just hold tight with my current running backs? Tony Pollard, AJ Dillon, Elijah Mitchell and Jacob. Some interesting names in there. Elijah Mitchell, I'm looking at you. What do you think about this one, JJ? Is this, what do you think about this running back situation? I mean, so I have Michael Pittman ahead of Najee Harris the rest of season. I'm certainly worried about Pittman with the quarterback change and what that could do for him. But with Matt Ryan, he's seen one deep ball target all year. If you're looking at 15 plus air yard throws, he's seen zero 20 plus air yard throws. So he's not been that good in fan. Like for as crappy as Najee Harris has been, Michael Pittman's basically been like the Najee Harris of the wide receiver position. Like he's not giving you these spiked weeks. He's giving you more of a floor than a ceiling. Like it's just not that fun. And so like I can understand making that deal if you really want to make that deal. If you're really loaded, let's say a wide receiver. I don't think that that's that absurd and just hope that the Steelers can turn things around and that Najee just looks a little bit better coming off that Liz Frank. But I think Tony Pollard is still a fine like RB3-ish with Dak. AJ Dillon, I don't think you can start right now. Eli Mitchell lost all of his appeal because of Christian McCaffrey. And then Isaiah Pacheco, you're just kind of stashing. So the only guy that I like on your roster at the RB2 spot is Tony Pollard, you know, at least in the short term. So if you want to do a deal like this, as much as I've been down, I mean, I've been down on Najee Harris since April. I mean, I just, I don't like the situation. You know, he's obviously not looked very explosive, but Michael Pittman sort of in the same boat. And I'm worried about the mobility that we're going to see out of the quarterback position in Indianapolis as well, which could limit, you know, looks through the air with that team. So if you want to do that trade, I think it's fair enough as long as you're deep enough at wide receiver. Yeah, you know, Najee Harris is someone who I feel like is a good, he's someone who I'm targeting in trades right now. And it's not that I think the offensive situation is going to get that much better in Pittsburgh. It's just that like, there aren't that many running backs who are getting as much, as many opportunities as he's getting. And even if he's not really turning that into like a ton of like crazy fantasy production, like you're saying, JJ, I still like that type of running, that there's still value in that type of running back on my team. And if you have the upside to then be Najee Harris, if he's able to, you know, work it out throughout the season. Yeah, it's, yeah. To me, like he's an RB two, like that's just what he is. Like a, probably like a lower end one, but he's an RB two and he's getting volume and there's nothing wrong with that. Like that's fine. Because in the context here, it's not like you're training someone who has shown massive, massive upside this season in fantasy and they're getting this quarterback change. So I think it's a pretty neutral trade. And if it's benefiting both teams, it's great. Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. I agree with you. Let's see. What is this? So, uh, Hardik asking, what are your thoughts on Elijah Moore? Now that Corey Davis and Breece Hall are no longer an option for the team. And now with Robinson coming in. Yeah. I mean, let's hope that, I mean, we're waiting, right? Like you don't have answers. I don't have answers with what's going on with Elijah Moore. So it's kind of tough to answer. I think he's a hold though, in case there is a move by the deadline or in case they just start using it more and he gets targeted a little bit more. Yeah. Victor asking, do you see Jashon Watson as a second half stash or any QBs that you like for the second half of the, or to stream? He's only sporting cousins right now, old Kirkie cousins. I think Watson in a single quarterback league, it's probably a little early to roster him in most leagues, but I do think that he could have value during the second half of the season, for sure, or when he comes back. You know, the quarterback position really takes a big hit, like after the burrow area. I mean, like living the stream, the other podcasts I do, I do the late round podcasts and then living the stream. We've streamed this season the equivalent of a QB six and points per game. We've been better than Kyler Murray through streaming. And it's not so much that we've been amazing, but there's such a drop off and there's such pitiful production from the quarterback position once you get past like Lamar and Joe Burrow, that it's just very easy to replace that production. And DeSean Watson at least has the ability to be above that and be above replacement. So, you know, it depends on what your league structure is like, how deep it is, all that kind of stuff. I think in most leagues of the people that are watching this right now, if you're in a 10 or a 12 team league, you can probably wait a little bit longer to add DeSean. Yeah, yeah, I agree with you. DeSean Watson, even though we haven't seen him in a while, as soon as he gets on the field, he's just one of those types of players who is excellent. His talent is insane. And so, yeah, I think he's a good stash. I agree with you that it's probably a little too early. How early are you getting before you start? Like, when is the week 12? He comes back? The week 11? 12. Probably like... 10? 10-ish, yeah. I mean, like, it's all dependent. Like, you guys know how aggressive your league is more than I do. Like, it just depends. Like, there are some leagues where I might want to add them next week. There's some leagues where I can probably wait until literally when he's back. So it just depends on when your league, you know how aggressive your league is. Yeah, great, great point there. Kate Naskin. I have Madison Pacheco, Chuba Hubbard, and Derek Henry. Is Justin Jefferson for ETN and DeAndre Hopkins solid? Man, it's Clemson's side of this trade. What do you think, JJ? Yeah, this is an LSU for Clemson deal right here. I'm probably still sticking with Justin Jefferson. I usually just stick with the one and a two for one. You know, Hopkins had a great game in terms of production and such, but I don't know if that usage is going to continue the same way for a lot of reasons, kind of where he lined up. You know, Rondell Moore played on the perimeter a lot in that game and it just, it didn't work. He's not a perimeter wide receiver. You know, when Robbie Anderson comes back, it's just going to, it's going to shift things a little bit. I think Hopkins is fine. I think he's like a wide receiver too from here on out. And I think ETN's a low end running back one. But Justin Jefferson is Justin Jefferson. So, you know, depending on what you're just overall situation and such looks like, I don't think it's like the most horrific trade in the world, but I would still take the Jefferson side. Listen, ask anybody, they'll tell you, I'm the biggest Clemson fan. I'm taking the Justin Jefferson side of that trade. Even so, even so. We got green screens in here saying, hey friends, what up? What up, friends, greens? Welcome in. Ooh, that was a fast 30 minutes. That went quick. That went quick. JJ, that was fun. If you guys haven't already, make sure you go follow JJ. LateRound.com, find all of his work there. Such a good resource, I'm telling you. And you follow him at LateRoundQB if you're not already. Make sure you're following FanDuel on Twitter, Twitch, TikTok, and then subscribe to them on YouTube and hit that like button on this video. We'll be back here every single Tuesday during the NFL season, getting you ready. Doing your answer in any waiver wire questions I have. Obviously a lot of trade questions today, any trade questions you have. I think that'll do it. You ready, JJ? Let's go, man. All right, we'll see you next time. Bye-bye.