 The debate about poverty in this country has been stuck in a really bad paradigm for a long time. And the paradigm is conservatives say personal responsibility, family formation. The centrists and liberals say, well, we just need to do more government programs, which I believe in by the way. And Elise was great in emphasizing the importance of tax and transfer. But what's been lost is the share of the country's wealth and growth and productivity going to workers as a dimension of the poverty issue in the country. So I actually think the country recognizes the centrality of the wage question to inequality and to poverty in a way more than the conventional wisdom in Washington does. And so what I think you saw with the spark that was lit by the fast food workers who took enormous risks and exhibited enormous courage, the reason for the residents of that demand for 15 is obviously that it will make a huge difference in people's lives. But also I think it spoke to this deep truth in Elise's paper. She will understand that the underlying cause here has to do with the distribution set of policies that have resulted in the distribution of the labor market of these gains in a totally unfair way and that we can choose to do it differently. So whether it's fast food workers or Walmart workers or minimum wage campaigns or paid sick day campaigns around scheduling, the huge momentum in the country I really think speaks to this analysis and I'm hopeful that this analysis can help us break through to the kind of bold solutions that the country needs and really help lay an intellectual foundation for a different way at coming at this profound moral crisis of poverty we have in the country.