 What about for that third group, and this is when we think about preventative mechanisms and you and I have had a lot of discussions where you get this sentencing report that I akin to like a sociological examination of a defendant's life. Yeah. And there's so much information. There's a whole report compiled before sentencing of a person's life history and the extenuating circumstances. You also look at the victim impact statement. I mean there's all of this kind of information that is contextualizing information both about the crime in question and talk to us about the interventions that you, the kinds of interventions you wish you would see that can inform our policy thinking about what could be preventative now. Because part of the issue when you're sentencing adults, sometimes you feel like you're starting at the wrong end, you know. So like people, at least in Ohio, when you're sentencing you get an amazing amount of information. You get education history, military history, mental health history, substance abuse history and you even get history about the defendant's parents. You know, had they ever been convicted of a crime. People that the defendant have children with or associate with, do they have criminal records? Does the defendant's children even have criminal records? And you know, there are certain points, you know, the most difficult to deal with quite honestly are, you know, where you see mother was prostituting to support her drug habit to mask her mental health issues. And so she doesn't know who dad was. And you just can't help but feel that that person was going to have an uphill battle literally when the sperm at the egg, literally because of the, I mean even if you think about the circumstances in the mom's body, you know, if she was taking drugs while she was pregnant or if the father was taking drugs when the baby was conceived. And so it's hard to think of it that way because it just seems like that person was just going to have an uphill climb before they even came here. But then you also see things like, you know, people dropping out of school in middle school. You know, I think, you know, we hear more often of people dropping out of school in high school. But it seems like if someone's dropping out of school in middle school, like it's almost like no one must be watching either at home or at school. You know, so that's a point of, you know, it were intervention if somebody had even noticed that somebody wasn't coming to school and lots of things like, you know, I would say parents who, you know, go to on vacation because I also think that a lot of people have this misconception of that crime is something that happens to poor people. And rich people commit crimes too. But oftentimes makes the difference or the resources to deal with it because, you know, your parents might have the money to pay the defense attorney that charges $10,000 to walk in the door. So you just, you have to look at each person individually, but also recognize crime, domestic violence, things like that, do not see class. And the difference a lot of times is the access and it really goes into social determinants of health because, you know, you see, you know, zip codes where the life expectancy of someone is like 10, 15 years less than the zip code right next to them. And they have different access to education and they have different access to health care and different access to even healthy food. And so all of that comes into play, possibly even at different intervention points. So I think that we have to take all of that into consideration because I'm really convinced that if we did, it would land us in the middle where I am. And it would create a radically different experience for judges.